240 likes | 332 Views
Gestión de la Limpieza Urbana: Una inversión para el futuro de las ciudades. Introduction The Study Results Final consideration. Contents. Execution. Introduction. 1. Introduction. Solid waste management globally. What kind of problems do we have here?. Introduction.
E N D
Gestión de la Limpieza Urbana: Una inversión para el futuro de las ciudades
Introduction The Study Results Final consideration Contents
Introduction • 1
Introduction Solid waste management globally What kind of problems do we have here?
Introduction Solid waste management globally The current waste generation in the world is around 12 billion tons/year. 125.000 EstadioOlímpico Atahualpa full of waste =
Introduction Solid waste management globally Managing solid waste is one of biggest challenges of the urban areas of all sizes, from mega-cities to the small towns and large villages.
1 2 % 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 1 8 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 5 , 7 1 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 9 0 % 8 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 6 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 Total urbansolid waste generation in the year (ton/year) Introduction Solid waste management in Brazil 2.906 open dumps If we imagine that the Brazilian average weight is 66.5 kg (2005), it can be said that every citizen generates 5.7 times of its own weight in waste. Brazilian population
The Study • 2
The Study Objetives Present the public models of Urban Cleaning Services: • Financial and social resources applied • Legal and institutional structures • Interaction between local government and the services providers Comparison of public management models in relation to solid waste management in 15 selected cities.
The Study Selected cities Brazilian cities: • São Paulo • Rio de Janeiro • Belo Horizonte • Brasília • Goiânia • Salvador International cities: • New York • Tokyo • Paris • Londres • Rome • Mexico City • Buenos Aires • Barcelona • Lima
The Study Disclaimer • The study was made in 2009 and updated in 2011. • The cities selection was based on combination of factors: characteristics of large cities, highlights in solid waste management systems and data availability and reliability. • Data source: Governamental and academic reports and websites. • Lack of similar national and international studies on the sector.
The Study Waste management responsibility * The municipality is co-responsible for small amounts. The maximum amount will vary according to the specific local legislation.
The Study Municipal solid waste estructure Geographic and socioeconomic characterization Management Municipal waste services Laws and regulations Municipal budget Executing agents of waste services Fee collection type Supervision Perceptions of key stakeholders
Results • 3
Results Key information of the selected cities
Results Financial resourcesExpenditures with solid waste per capita (US$/hab/year) Tokyo extensively invests in innovative systems. Mexico City has high costs due to a swollen structure to perform the services, with approximately 4 times more employees compared to São Paulo. Barcelona has one of the best Selective Collection Programme, investing in innovative techniques and equipments.
Results Financial resourcesExpenditures with solid waste per capita (US$/hab/year) and amount of solid waste collected per capita (kg/hab/year)
Results Comparison between Brazilian cities
Results Fee on waste managementBrazilian and international cities
Results OutsourcingBrazilian and international cities • On the concession contracts, most of the time, companies are financially responsible for infrastructure services, such as installation and expansion of landfills, transfer stations, trucks. • Cities and experience with good governance practices deal with the segregation of duties and responsibilities.
Final considerations Challenges of the Municipal Solid Waste Management • Local solutions to local problems • Proper data collection and management systems • Focus on waste reduction, reuse and building recycling rates • Financially sustainable • User inclusivity: Consultation, communication and involvement of users
Muchas gracias! Marta Braconi PwC Brazil marta.braconi@br.pwc.com Patrick Dykmans PwC Ecuador patrick.dykmans@ec.pwc.com 2008-2012 PricewaterhouseCoopers. Todos os direitos reservados. "PricewaterhouseCoopers" e "PwC" referem-se à rede mundial de firmas da PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited (PwCIL). Cada firma-membro é uma pessoa jurídica separada e independente e que não atua como agente da PwCIL nem de qualquer outra firma-membro. A PwCIL não presta serviços a clientes. A PwCIL não é responsável pelos atos ou omissões de qualquer uma das suas firmas-membro, nem pode controlar o julgamento profissional das referidas firmas nem obrigá-las de qualquer forma. Nenhuma firma-membro é responsável pelos atos ou omissões de outra firma-membro nem pode controlar o julgamento profissional de outra firma-membro ou da PwCIL, nem obrigá-las de qualquer forma.