1 / 4

Table of Contents

Table of Contents. Methodology and Sample Description. Stratified samples of civilian/nonmilitary spouses of Active Component Soldiers selected using official Army personnel files

Download Presentation

Table of Contents

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Table of Contents

  2. Methodologyand Sample Description • Stratified samples of civilian/nonmilitary spouses of Active Component Soldiers selected using official Army personnel files • Three subsamples defined based on the deployment status of the Soldier spouse during the last 36 months, that is, the Soldier spouse is/has: • Currently Deployed (CD) • Deployed & Returned (DR) • Not deployed (ND) • Each subsample received a different survey with some items tailored to the Soldier spouse’s deployment status. • SAF VI conducted from February 2010 through June 2010 • 16,805 responses received; 28% response rate • 16,805 usable responses included in the final database (5,990 spouses of officers and 10,815 spouses of enlisted personnel)

  3. Methodology and Sample Description • 7. Results weighted to total population of 269,745 spouses of Active Component Soldiers (45,009 officers and 224,736 enlisted), including: • 45,447 spouses of Currently Deployed Soldiers • 146,487 spouses of Deployed & Returned Soldiers • 77,811 spouses of Not Deployed Soldiers • The following text and graphic slides present weighted population percentages for spouses. • The text slides specify the SAF VI subsample and, when trend data is available, compare the SAF VI data with the total sample data from SAFs of previous years. • The text slides also indicate when there are significant differences between the 2004/5 and 2010 responses. • The graphic slides present the sampling error along with the subsample (CD, DR, ND) for which data are presented.

  4. Methodology and Sample Description • Add sampling errors (SE) to determine if differences in percentage results are statistically significant. • SE for total spouses +/- 1% • Raw unweighted sample sizes and sampling errors:

More Related