140 likes | 403 Views
“Economic Law”. James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center February 2010. Non-tariff Barriers to Free Trade. Shortcomings of China’s multi-layered, opaque regulatory approval systems;
E N D
“Economic Law” James V. Feinerman James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies Georgetown University Law Center February 2010
Non-tariff Barriers to Free Trade • Shortcomings of China’s multi-layered, opaque regulatory approval systems; • China’s State-owned enterprises drive market behavior; • failure adequately to protect intellectual property rights; and • “rule of law” issues, eg. contracting
Regulatory Framework • History • Command economy • Strong control by State Planning Commission (now the National Development and Reform Commission) • Government owned and operated enterprises • Top-down regulation
Regulatory Framework • Characterized by • Administrative misunderstanding of policy issues underpinning regulations eg. competition laws • Embryonic rule of law creates inconsistent interpretation, e.g.: “priority” • Inconsistency of implementation between authorities/levels of government • Lack of transparency – no judicial review
Supervises the Government’s interest in 189 largest enterprises Its task – modernization Creates 14 million unemployed workers p.a. State-owned EnterprisesState Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (“SASAC”)
Most significant Sino-foreign transactions involve SOEs SOEs drive market behavior Reform process outcomes are critical to trade liberalization State-owned Enterprises (“SOEs”)
Intellectual Property • Is China serious about enforcement of IP rights post-WTO? • China produces 350,000 technologically trained engineers every year, who in turn are generating world class technology • We under-estimate China’s technological capacity
Intellectual Property • Protection of technological advantages is vital for foreign manufacturers • 43,000 infringement claims over the past 12 months • Most processed by the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (“SAIC”) , not the Courts • Reliance on administrative functionaries • Lack of judicial review
Contracting – Impediments to Free Trade Is my contract binding? Western approach Expectation of failure Focus on written documents “rules for the engagement of war” Litigation Termination of business relationship Rule of Law
Contracting (cont) Chinese approach – why relationships are important Agreements in principle, MOUs, LOIs, HoA Contracts – statement of intentions at the time Commercial, financial, legal matrix Negotiate difficulties – with someone they trust Government role is crucial e.g. LNG Rule of Law
An FTA with China? To negotiate an FTA without regard to these non-tariff impediments to “free” trade would be to delude ourselves that an FTA will deliver broad-ranging access to China’s markets Summary