150 likes | 410 Views
Governance Options Part I. Teresa Vast Early Childhood Policy Consultant. Early Childhood Education Temporary Task Force Governance Working Group Meeting September 8, 2005. Overview . What do we mean by governance? Why create a new governance structure?
E N D
Governance OptionsPart I Teresa Vast Early Childhood Policy Consultant Early Childhood Education Temporary Task Force Governance Working Group Meeting September 8, 2005
Overview • What do we mean by governance? • Why create a new governance structure? • What are the roles of governance in the system? • What are key characteristics of an effective governance structure? • What are current state-level governance structures for early care and education in the nation? • What are some pros and cons of each model for Hawaii?
Definition • Governance of ECE is…. …that combination of formal and informal decision-making practices that establish the legal, fiscal, operational, political, and economic basis of an early care and education system… (adapted from Reveal, 1991)
Why Create a New Governance Structure? • To achieve child and family results, e.g. school readiness • To coordinate all sub-systems into an effective system for children and families • To establish decision-making authority that extends across existing programs and services and that is not controlled or unduly influenced by one government agency (Bruner, p. 17)
What are key characteristics needed in a governance structure? • Representative – involving those whose perspectives and expertise are needed to make effective decisions • Legitimate – regarded as a fair and appropriate locus for decision-making by those affected by the decisions made • Enduring – sustainable across changes in leadership • Effective and flexible – organized/structured for continuous improvement • Authoritative – capable of holding all elements of the system accountable to achieving their objectives (Bruner, p. 10-11)
Current ECE Governance at the State Level • Voluntary Coordination/Collaboration • Mandatory Coordination/Collaboration • Joint management by two or more departments • Two or more major programs consolidated in an existing department • New entity dedicated to early care and education
Voluntary Coordination/Collaboration • Separate departments responsible for different aspects of early care and education • Variants • no coordination • voluntary coordination • may include advisory bodies, e.g. commission, coordinating committee • may include private sector representation
Mandatory Coordination/Collaboration • Separate departments responsible for different aspects of early care and education • Mechanism for cross-department coordination/collaboration, e.g. Children’s Cabinet State examples: Delaware; Louisiana; Maryland; West Virginia
Mandatory Coordination/Collaboration • Variants… • Authority to set standards • Produce a cross-dept children’s budget with prioritized funding recommendations • Pool funds • May disburse funds to support initiatives • Advisory board • Private sector representatives, parents may be included • May link to local governance entities or communities
Joint management by two departments • Two agencies jointly fund and manage early care and education programs, e.g. Human Services and Education • Variants • One agency may have a greater role • Coordination with other agencies • Coordination with private sector • May have linkages to local governance entities State examples: Arkansas; Connecticut
Two or more major programs consolidated in an existing department • Effort to improve collaboration across programs • Variants • May create an Office of Early Childhood within an existing department • Coordination with other agencies • Coordination with private sector • May have linkages to local governance entities State examples: Florida; Maryland; Tennessee
New entity dedicated to ECE • Establish independent office under Governor ….OR… • Consolidate early care and education programs in a new, independent department • Establish a governance board for oversight
New entity dedicated to ECE • Variants • Advisory board to include additional expertise • Coordination with other agencies to link with comprehensive services • Coordination with private sector • May have linkages to local governance entities State examples: Georgia; Massachusetts; North Carolina
Key ingredients for success • Vision and leadership of individuals in the governance structure • Create structures to meet objectives • Connect different structures and activities so they are aligned toward overall system goals • Legal authority • Power to control allocation of at least some portion of resources • New stream of funding • Adapt and change • Understand that political climate and culture are important Caution: No single model will guarantee success!
References • Reveal, Elizabeth C. (1991). Governance Options for The Children’s Initiative: Making Systems Work. Havertown, PA: Center for Assessment and Policy Development • Bruner, Charles, with Michelle Stover Wright, Barbara Gebhard, and Susan Hibbard. (2004). Building an Early Learning System: The ABCs of Planning and Governance Structures. Des Moines, IA: Child & Family Policy Center, State Early Childhood Policy Technical Assistance Network (SECPTAN)