80 likes | 95 Views
Learnings from implementing a new data editing device for French structural business statistics, including challenges faced, improvements made, and lessons learned at the Conference of European Statisticians in Paris, April 2014.
E N D
Questions raised by the implementation of the data editing device for French structural business statistics Work session on statistical data editing, Paris, April 2014 (topic iii)
Outlines of the presentation A new production process for French Structural Business Statistics has been working for 5 years What have we learnt from it ? 2 2 Conference on European Statisticians – Work Session on Statistical Data Editing
1. A few elements on the production process 3 3 Conference on European Statisticians – Work Session on Statistical Data Editing • The Esane process was put into place in 2009 • Produces Structural business statistics every year ; • Is the main yearly statistical source on firms for Eurostat and French National Accounts ; • The old system used two different sources : a survey and administrative data (tax declarations) ; • A new system under constraint • A change under constraint : budget and staff were called to diminish ; • Methodology : keep high standards on statistical quality • Insee’s answer through the Esane process • Produce only one set of statistics, instead of two before ; • Put selective editing methods into place.
2. From theory to practice (1/2) 4 4 Conference on European Statisticians – Work Session on Statistical Data Editing • In theory, the data editing system was based on the following idea : • Implementation of local scores reflecting the “influence” of a firm on the final result (based on temporal and contemporary drop-out scores) ; • Synthetic global priority scores pointing problematic firms out. • In practice, three main problems • The scores were sometimes unsatisfactory (unstable, not adapted to some variables, problem with measuring the potential error) ; • The method led to too much work for the staff (thresholds calculated « a priori » had to be adjusted) ; • The first intended calendar was unrealistic.
2. From theory to practice (2/2) 5 5 Conference on European Statisticians – Work Session on Statistical Data Editing • Since 2009, the methods have been fine-tuned • The computation of local score aggregates is more robust (based on a yearly median growth rate estimate for each sector) ; • Computation of the global score, taking into account the relative importance of the results of each local score • But the data editing method still lacks efficiency for some variables • The calendar for the production process has been reviewed • Instead of publishing one final result in December of year N+1… • …We publish • Semi-final results in December N+1 by implementing only part of the administrative data (75% of the firms, 85% of the final value added) ; • Final results in June N+2 after implementing all the data.
3. Lessons learnt (1) 6 6 Conference on European Statisticians – Work Session on Statistical Data Editing • Lesson one :Selective editing is better when there is feedback from the producers • we changed our methods thanks to feedback from the editing staff; • We plan on keeping very close to them : • Yearly reviews on Esane process’ help us improve; • The editing staff is more satisfied than in the beginning • Working closely prevents the “black box” effect
3. Lessons learnt (2) 7 7 Conference on European Statisticians – Work Session on Statistical Data Editing • Lesson two :feedback from the users is also helpful • It helped us change our calendar • Led us to invest on output editing… • Helped us to improve our editing methods • Lesson three : we need to keep working on the methods • Keep robust output editing methods (as a safeguard) • Having a continuous improvement of the methods through the use of metadata • But we don’t think it would be efficient to have globally standardized selective editing tools for all Insee • Could be useful for structural firm surveys • And administrative data.
Questions raised by the implementation of the data editing device for French structural business statistics Insee 18 bd Adolphe-Pinard 75675 Paris Cedex 14 www.insee.fr Informations statistiques : www.insee.fr / Contacter l’Insee 09 72 72 4000 (coût d’un appel local) du lundi au vendredi de 9h00 à 17h00 Thank you for your attention ! Contact M. Philippe Brion Courriel : philippe.brion@insee.fr Conference on European Statisticians – Work Session on Statistical Data Editing