210 likes | 229 Views
This presentation provides an update on the evaluation of OFDMA performance in 11ax using a PHY/MAC integrated simulator. Topics covered include MU-RTS/CTS, CCA in UL-OFDMA, and simulation setup parameters.
E N D
OFDMA performance in 11ax Date: 2016-01-17 Authors: Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Introduction • From September meeting, we have addressed OFDMA performance using PHY/MAC integrated simulator • OFDMA shows better performance in throughput and latency in DL & UL mixed traffic • This presentation provides update on it Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Update on Simulation • MU-RTS/CTS • We evaluate MU-RTS/CTS on OFDMA • CCA in UL-OFDMA • STAs perform CCA after Trigger frame reception Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Simulation Setup: Scheduler • Scheduling resource • Maximum allocation per one station is 1 RU • 1 RU: 242-tone (total 4 RUs in 80 MHz) • Scheduling policy • Random: AP selects STAs randomly • In DL case, • primary destination is fixed (Head of AP’s queue) • frame length is determined by A-MPDU length to primary destination (legacy spec rule) Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
CCA in UL-OFDMA • CCA in UL-OFDMA • STAs perform CCA after Trigger frame reception Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
MU-RTS/CTS in DL-OFDMA • MU-RTS/CTS Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
MU-RTS/CTS in DL-OFDMA • Detail operation • We evaluate simple MU-RTS/CTS scheme because of simulator issue • Resource for RTS/CTS is aligned with Data/ACK transmission • Only one resource unit can be allocated for RTS/CTS/DATA/ACK • Preamble detection thresholds are -82 dBm for primary channel and -72 dBm for secondary channels • STAs perform CCA after RTS frame reception • If a channel which is allocated for data is sensed as busy, the STA will not transmit CTS frame Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Simulation Setup: Parameters Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Topology • Topology description • 20 APs (Fixed location: center of room) • 4 or 10 or 20 STAs per one AP (Random location) • Primary/secondary channels of every AP are same • Simulation setting • Open Loop Link Adaption [3] • Channelization: Fixed channelization • Trigger frame is generated every 10 msec period and trigger frame has priority over data frame CH1 CH2 CH3 Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Simulation cases • Case 1: Throughput vs. # of STAs (DL/UL 4 Mbps) • 4 STAs • 10 STAs • 20 STAs • Case 2: Throughput vs. Traffic load (4 STAs) • DL/UL 4 Mbps • DL/UL 50 Mbps Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Simulation Result – Case 1 • OFDMA Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Simulation Result – Case 1 • Legacy Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Simulation Result – Case 1 • Legacy vs. OFDMA • Observation • RTS/CTS is more powerful in many STAs case • Throughput gain of RTS/CTS is more larger in legacy case • Nevertheless, OFDMA shows better throughput in dense cases Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Simulation Result – Case 2 • OFDMA Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Simulation Result – Case 2 • Legacy Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Simulation Result – Case 2 • Legacy vs. OFDMA • Observation • Throughput gain of RTS/CTS is more larger in legacy case • In 4-STA-OFDMA case, throughput gain of RTS/CTS is limited even though traffic level increases • Nevertheless, OFDMA shows better throughput in most cases Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Next Step • Following items will be added to OFDMA simulation • Advanced MU-RTS/CTS • Feedback modeling • Sophisticated schedulers • Different scenarios/traffic model Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Conclusion • We addressed OFDMA performance when we use simple MU-RTS/CTS and CCA after trigger frame • RTS/CTS is more powerful in many STAs case and legacy cases • Nevertheless, OFDMA shows better throughput Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Reference • [1] 11-15/0132r7 Spec Framework • [2] 11-14/0980r14 Simulation Scenarios • [3] 11-14/620r0 link adaptation for PHY SLS calibration • [4] 11-14/0571r10 11ax Evaluation Methodology Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Backup Slide- PER Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics
Simulation Result • Legacy vs. OFDMA Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics