230 likes | 452 Views
Identifying Causes of Accidents. Surface vs. Root Causes Surface causes are: the hazardous conditions or unsafe work practices that directly or indirectly contributed to the accident. Root causes are:
E N D
Identifying Causes of Accidents • Surface vs. Root Causes • Surface causes are: • the hazardous conditions or unsafe work practices that directly or indirectly contributed to the accident. • Root causes are: • the safety or loss control system weaknesses that allow the existence of hazardous conditions and unsafe work practices. • Most accident investigations only identify the surface causes of accidents.
Events and Causal Factor Analysis • Events and Causal Factor Analysis identifies the time sequence of a series of tasks and/or actions and the surrounding conditions leading to an occurrence. • The results are displayed in an Events and Causal Factor chart that gives a picture of the relationships of the events and causal factors.
Change Analysis • Change Analysis is used when the problem is obscure. • It is a systematic process that is generally used for a single occurrence and focuses on elements that have changed.
Barrier Analysis • Barrier Analysis is a systematic process that can be used to identify physical, administrative, and procedural barriers or controls that should have prevented the occurrence.
Management oversight and Risk Tree (MORT) Analysis • MORT and Mini-MORT are used to identify inadequacies in barriers/controls, specific barrier and support functions, and management functions. • It identifies specific factors relating to an occurrence and identifies the management factors that permitted these factors to exist.
Human Performance Evaluation • Human Performance Evaluation identifies those factors that influence task performance. • The focus of this analysis method is on operability, work environment, and management factors. • Man-machine interface studies to improve performance take precedence over disciplinary measures.
Kepner-Tregoe Problem Solving and Decision Making • Kepner-Tregoe is a management consulting firm • Kepner-Tregoe provides a systematic framework for gathering, organizing, and evaluating information and applies to all phases of the occurrence investigation process. • Phases: • Situation appraisal: Identify concerns • Problem analysis: Define the problem (Similar to Change Analysis) • Decision Analysis: Evaluate alternatives, assess risks • Potential Problem Analysis: What new problems may be introduced by the alternatives?
Accident Investigation Process • The accident investigation process involves the following steps: • Report the accident occurrence to a designated person within the organization • Provide first aid and medical care to injured person(s) and prevent further injuries or damage • Investigate the accident • Identify the causes • Report the findings • Develop a plan for corrective action • Implement the plan • Evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective action • Make changes for continuous improvement
Retrospective Investigations • Retrospective investigations are accident investigations that look back in time at a situation. Most investigations conducted in the workplace can be classified as a retrospective investigation.
Statistical Investigations • Statistical investigations utilize data collected over a period of time to determine causes and develop prevention measures. • Statistical investigations utilize mathematical techniques that identify the causes for accidents in terms of statistical probabilities.
Large Loss Investigations • Large loss investigations are considered in-depth investigations directed at an accident that resulted in a larger than usual loss of life, money, or property damage. • Examples of large loss investigations include large industrial fires, plant explosions, and airplane crashes
Systems Investigations • Systems investigations utilize a systems approach to the identification of causal factors. • There are a variety of systems investigation techniques available including root cause analysis, Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), and Failure Modes and Effects analysis (FMEA).
Human Error and Accident Management • Human Error and Accident Management offers means and ways to recognize and prevent these behaviors. • Provides for a means to control and recover from these behaviors when they do occur and to contain and escape from their adverse.
Accidents and Human Errors • Human error is the cause of accidents • To explain a failure, you look for a failure • You must find people's inaccurate assessments, wrong decisions, and bad judgments • Human error is a symptom of trouble deeper inside a system • To explain failure, do not try to find where people went wrong • Instead, find how people's assessments and actions made sense at the time, given the circumstances that surrounded them
Types of Human Errors • Random versus Systemic Errors • What’s the difference? • Is one type easier to control than the other?
Active Errors • Active errors become very visible in the evolution of an event. • The active errors are also the most obvious occurrences and the most rapidly identified human contributors in an accident.
Latent Errors • The higher in the organization these latent errors are made, the more serious the consequences at the front line operation. • Latent errors of strategic nature, such as defining company policies affect safety attitudes and the safety culture in the organization. • The most serious and dangerous errors to be tackled.
Accident Investigation Process • What are some ways you as an investigator can identify human errors as they contribute to the accident sequence? • Are human errors the root causes for accidents? • Why or why not?
Human Error and Accident Investigations • As an accident investigator, what role does your knowledge about human error play in your investigation process?
Questions for probing the reasons for events that appear to be caused by human error • Was the possibility of the error known? * • Were the potential consequences of the error known? * • What about the activity made it prone to the occurrence of the error? • What about the situation contributed to the creation of the error? • Was there an opportunity to prevent the error prior to it's occurrence? * • Once the error was committed, was there any way to recover from it? * • What about the system sustained the error instead of terminating it? • What fed the error, and drove it to become a bigger problem? • What made the consequences as bad as they were? • What (if anything) kept the consequences from being worse? • * If YES, why did the event proceed beyond this point? If NO, why not?