1 / 7

STRENGTHENING STATE INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

STRENGTHENING STATE INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS. N. C. Leppla and D. A. Herbert, Jr. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT. Criteria. States. Full-time coordinator 3 Control of 3(d) funds 5 <50% of 3(d) funds in salaries 5 Obtain extramural funding 9 Adequate technical support 4

idalia
Download Presentation

STRENGTHENING STATE INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STRENGTHENING STATE INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS N. C. Leppla and D. A. Herbert, Jr.

  2. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Criteria States • Full-time coordinator 3 • Control of 3(d) funds 5 • <50% of 3(d) funds in salaries 5 • Obtain extramural funding 9 • Adequate technical support 4 • Adequate facilities and equipment 6 • Program management structure 4 • Planning/priority setting process 5 • Assure IPM program recognition 4

  3. PROGRAM DELIVERY Criteria States • Communication system 8 • Mini-grants program 3 • Produce manuals, guides 8 • Provide IPM consultation 7 • Seek funding for cooperators 8 • Conduct training activities 9 • Means of measuring benefits 3

  4. PROGRAM INVOLVEMENT Criteria States • Cooperative Extension 10 • Research collaboration 7 • Clientele collaboration 8 • Interdisciplinary scope 10 • Inter-institutional range 6 • Statewide involvement 8 • Regional & national liaison 8

  5. PROGRAM SUPPORT Criteria States • Unit leader 10 • University administration 9 • Clientele 8 • Professional development 6

  6. Additional Considerations • How long has the current state IPM program been in place? • How long has the current State IPM Coordinator been in place (or is there one)? • What is the average total annual funding for the state IPM program? • What is the scope of the state IPM program, i.e., agriculture, community, natural areas? • Has the state IPM program been cut back, e.g., mini-grants eliminated, coordinator time reduced? • Does the State IPM Coordinator know if the 3(d) funds are spent on IPM?

  7. Additional Considerations • If some of the 3(d) funds are available for use by the State IPM Coordinator, what percentage? • Is the salary of the State IPM Coordinator paid by state or 3(d) funding? • How can we help “brand” state IPM programs? • How can we increase teamwork in the Land Grant system? • How can we develop objective or subjective measures of success for state IPM programs? • How can we increase support for state IPM programs among higher level administrators? • How can we increase training in IPM, e.g., university courses, presentations, interns?

More Related