230 likes | 438 Views
. A Longitudinal Study of Consumer/Survivor Initiatives in Community Mental Health in Ontario. First, independent evaluation of Consumer/Survivor Initiatives in CanadaStudy funded by OMHF and CIHR, 1998-2004Research partners: Wilfrid Laurier University, Centre for Research and Education in Human S
E N D
1. A Longitudinal Study of Consumer/Survivor Initiatives in Community Mental Health in Ontario Research Process and Preliminary Findings Presenters:
Geoff Nelson
Joanna Ochocka
Rich Janzen
Alex Troeger
Robert Chapman
2. A Longitudinal Study of Consumer/Survivor Initiatives in Community Mental Health in Ontario First, independent evaluation of Consumer/Survivor Initiatives in Canada
Study funded by OMHF and CIHR, 1998-2004
Research partners: Wilfrid Laurier University, Centre for Research and Education in Human Services, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Ontario Peer Development Initiative
Part of Ontario Community Mental Health Evaluation Initiative
Crisis intervention
Case management
Consumer/survivor and family initiatives
3. Background of the Project Ontario Ministry of Health established a Community Health Evaluation Initative
Proposal Development - 1997
Partners: Wilfrid Laurier University, Centre for Research and Education, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, CSDI and CSIs
Submission, letter of support from 17 CSIs, funding Announcement - February 1998
Start - April 1998
Site Selection - July - August 1998
First Steering Committee Meeting - September 1998
Research Team Hired and Trained - January 1999
4. Relevance to PSR Principles Focus on wellness rather than degree of illness
Active participation and control for consumers in the research
Research process considering the dignity and respect of all involved
Capacity building and skill development through research
Focus on supports in the community
Providing employment and leadership opportunities for consumers
5. Purpose of the Longitudinal Study of Consumer/Survivor Initiatives To examine the activities and impacts of CSIs on new CSI members (individual level) and their communities (systems level)
6. A Participatory Action Research (PAR) Approach PAR is a research approach that involves active participation of stakeholders, those whose lives are affected by the issue being studied, in all phases of research for the purpose of producing useful results to make positive changes (Nelson, Ochocka, Griffin & Lord, 1998)
Four mechanisms:
Stakeholder steering committee
Consumer/survivor researchers and research team meetings (training, support, problem-solving, participation)
Connection with Coordination Unit based at CAMH
Ongoing communication and information sharing
7. Consumer/Survivor Initiatives: A Unique Component of the Mental Health System Self help/mutual aid organizations that have been developed exclusively by and for people with serious mental illness
CSIs - part of the mental health system in Ontario
CSIs are non-service strategies that include: self-help and peer support groups, opportunities for developing skills and participation in artistic and cultural activities, etc.
CSIs are guided by a set of values such as member empowerment, participation, social justice, sense of community and mutual learning
Funded in 1991 by Ontario Ministry of Health, there are now more than 60 CSIs in Ontario however the way they are operated is an alternative to other mental health services.
however the way they are operated is an alternative to other mental health services.
8. Consumer Survivor Initiatives:Similarities and Differences Similarities
Central-West area of Ontario, similar population base
all provide peer support to individual members
all engage in systems change activities
Differences
rural-urban
group vs. individual support
drop-in vs. community-focused activities for members
9. Project Partners
10. Process of Working Together: Steering Committee Composition (representation)
Purpose (to guide the all aspects of the research process)
Process (how often, locations, typical meeting, personal experience)
Challenges (participation over long period of time, making decisions about measurement tools)
11. Process of Working Together: Research Team Composition
Purpose (training, tracking, communicating, reflecting, learning, trouble shooting, supporting)
Process (how often, locations, typical meeting, personal experience)
Challenges (people’s health, distance, turnover)
12. Process of Working Together: Coordination Working with the Coordination Centre of CAMH
benefits (synergy, scanning, stronger impact)
challenges (negotiations around common protocols, cleaning data)
Working with Our Partners
benefits (synergy, grounded, ownership, utilization)
challenges (distance, duration, role clarification)
13. Researchers Expect to Find
Individual Level
Decreased use of mental health care
Improved social supports
Improved personal empowerment
Better community integration
Better access to valued resources (education, housing, employment
Improved life satisfaction
14. System Level
Better understanding of how CSIs operate
Increased opportunities for consumer participation
Increased psychological sense of community and peer support
Better understanding of positive effects on communities and mental health system (public education, political advocacy, community planning, action research)
15. Methodology
16. Methodology: Individual Quantitative
17. Preliminary Findings: Individual Quantitative
18. Methodology: Individual Qualitative
19. Preliminary Findings: Individual Qualitative
20. Preliminary Findings: Individual Qualitative
21. Methodology: Systems Quantitative
22. Methodology: Systems Qualitative
23. Dissemination Strategies: Impact of the Consumer/Survivor Initiatives Study Interim reports and fact sheets summaries circulated in four participating organizations, other mental health organizations across Canada, Task Forces and Ministry of Health
Presentations in Waterloo, Hamilton, Niagara Regions
Conferences: IAPSRS, Qualitative Health Research
Dissemination plan including book, video, magazine and journal articles
Regular updates and actions within Community Mental Health Evaluation Initiative
24. What Does It All Mean? It is possible to study and document the impacts of consumer/survivor initiatives in a rigorous fashion using a participatory action research approach
Consumer/survivor initiatives are an important resource to people with serious mental illness and to the broader communities in which they are situated
Many different dissemination strategies are needed to spread the word about the impacts of consumer/survivor initiatives to create community and social change that benefits people with serious mental illness