DADS Driver Attention Detection System

2. DADS Driver Attention Detection System Matthew Parks - Project Manager Justin Harzold - Software & web development Christopher Klutch - Hardware design & web development Steve Tegtmeyer - Analysis & hardware design Jim Forgy - Analysis & presentations

3. Failure Success DADS Outline • Identify & Validate the Problem • Potential Benefit • Proposed Solution Requirements • Objectives & Scope • Explain how DADS works (hardware, software & alarms) • Related Research • Key Personnel • Management Plan Objectives • Future Research & Development • Facilities & Consultants • Potential Applications (Market) • Component Costs • Budget • Estimated Sales & Profit • Conclusion & Questions

4. Problem Validated Problem Identified Inattentive and drowsy driving is a leading cause of fatal traffic crashes.

5. Economic costs for traffic crashes is $150 billion annually. • Accident resulting in a fatality - $2,723,000 per incident • Non-incapacitating crash - $48,000 per incident • Property damage only crash - $4,500 per incident Example - Before-After Data for Rumble Strips in NY State • Prior - 565 ROR crashes, 360 injuries, & 14 fatalities average per year. • After - 117 ROR crashes, 142 injuries, 2.5 fatalities average per year. • Total savings per year - $58,000,000 Potential Benefit SAVE LIVES! Greatly reduce accident costs

6. Why DADS?

7. Proposed Solution Requirements • Unique system to recognize road lines • Current technology • Find effective and reliable sensor • Must be at or next-to-real-time (NTRT) 1/200 second DADS computational requirement • Non-intrusive • Economical • Software & Computer Component

8. Scope • Vehicle must travel 45 mph or greater for system to engage • Idle when turn signal is on • Unable to detect obstructed lines Our Objectives • Develop Data Interpretive System (DIS) • Identify Hardware - CPU • Develop Software • Suitable Audio, Visual, & Tactile Alarms

9. Hardware (1 of 4)Sensors - Data Interpretive System (DIS) • Infrared has large & robust output range • Sensors emit light & detect wavelengths of reflected light • Gray-scale infrared light range will be established threshold • Reflected light wavelengths have corresponding voltages • Vehicle speed has no impact

10. Hardware (2 of 4)Sensors - Data Interpretive System (DIS) • 6 infrared sensors on a vehicle • 3 emitters and 3 detectors per sensor • Mounted on a small printed circuit board (PCB)

11. Hardware (3 of 4)CPU • 32-bit RISC processor • Tailors itself to “smart” automobile embedded solutions • Able to perform at next-to-real-time (NTRT) • Converts analog signal to associated voltage signal • Compares to established threshold • Sends control signal to that enables alarm system

12. Hardware (4 of 4)CPU • To be active, speed must greater than 45 mph & turn signal off • Testing and simulation software - C++ software designed to simulate machine code. • Will be used to check implementation of the software algorithms.

13. Software • First layer provides sensor input and higher layer interface. • Input layer has 3 modules; sensor, speedometer, turn signal. • Middle layer is the processing module. • Output layer sends control signal to 5-volt relay to activate alarms. • Two input conditions controlled by the software to reduce equipment.

14. Wiring • Standard 12-gauge wire and splicing connecters. Alarms • Audible • Visual • Tactile (Physical) • 5-volt Relay

15. Related Research Angle Issue

16. Key Personnel • Matthew Parks - Project Manager Project leader experience on GIS project from inception to completion. • Justin Harzold - Technical Manager Head Systems Analyst for ODU Computer Science Dept. • Chris Klutch - Design Manager Many years experience with military electronics and air traffic control systems. Consultants • John Lowenthal, Technical Engineer • 25 years as technical engineer for Ford Motor Company, Norfolk. • Dr. Jahbil Abdulla Muntassa, Software Validation • 18 years experience in software engineering and development. Achieved Ph.D. with specialty in software validation.

17. Management Plan Objectives

18. Future Research and Development • Upon Phase I approval, continue to improve system. • Increase marketing capability. • Liaison with car manufactures for possible integration into existing car electronic systems. • Work with DOT on requirement for DADS to be installed in all vehicles.

19. Facilities • Software development at ODU & residences • Small-scale prototype to be built at Mr. Parks’ garage. Potential Applications (Market) • Trucking Industry • Individual Drivers • Law enforcement to investigate accidents

20. Component Costs • 6 Infrared Sensors $50.00 • Microprocessor $7.00 • Audible alarm $1.99 • 12-volt flashing LED $1.45 • Tactile alarm $17.98* • 5-volt relay $3.95 • 25’ of 12 gauge wire $3.00 • 12 electrical connectors $1.20 • Installation included $0.00 • Total: $86.57 • *Prototype cost

21. Budget • Phase I Personnel $61,700 Equipment $27,200 Supplies $5,500 Travel $3,000 Total: $97,400 • Phase II $674,500 • Phase III $960,000

22. Estimated Sales and Profit • Sale Price minus Unit Cost , $179 - $100 = $79 profit • Trucking Industry Sales First Year 1000 1000*79 = $79,000 Second Year 5000 5000*79 = $395,000 Third Year 40,000 40,000*79 = $3,160,000 • Individual Driver Sales First Year 700 700*79 = $55,300 Second Year 3,500 3,500*79 = $276,500 Third Year 20,000 20,000*79 = $1,580,000 • SWAG profit estimate after 3 years of production: $5,545,800

23. Conclusion • Identified & Validated Problem • Potential Benefit • Explained desired system • Objectives & Scope • Illustrated how all components work • Key Personnel, Consultants & Management Objectives • Future Research & Development • Facilities, Potential Applications, Budget • Estimated Sales & Profit DADS is viable and will save lives! DADS is worth the investment.