1 / 23

Public Finance ( MPA405 )

Public Finance ( MPA405 ). Dr. Khurrum S. Mughal. Lecture 18: Government Subsidies and Income Support for the Poor. Public Finance. Subsidizing Food.

idola-carr
Download Presentation

Public Finance ( MPA405 )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Public Finance (MPA405) Dr. Khurrum S. Mughal

  2. Lecture 18: Government Subsidies and Income Support for the Poor Public Finance

  3. Subsidizing Food • Food Stamps are the subsidy that allows the recipient a particular allotment of vouchers to buy food but the recipient may supplement the subsidy with their cash. It is illegal to sell the food stamps though it may be in the recipients interests for them to do so. • Two different Cases

  4. C E2 E1 The Impact of an In-Kind Transfer: Food Stamps • Person initially at E1 • Can use subsidy for food only so BC is not attainable • Cash grant could enable her to attain that point • Total food consumption is grant plus her own spending • Grant frees some of her income for consumption of other goods A B F I Expenditure on Other Goods per Month (Dollars) M2 M1 U2 U1 0 QF QF1 QF2 A A' Food per Month

  5. The Impact of an In-Kind Transfer: Food Stamps E2 C E1 Q* 1 B • Person initially at E1 • Can use subsidy for food only so BC is not attainable • Moves to pint C on U2 • Cash grant could enable her to attain that point E2 at U3 B L I U3 M1 U2 U1 QF 0 QF2 QF1 A A' Food per Month

  6. Implication • Given that on average recipients would spend more per person than the grant • So the subsidy can be treated as substitute of cash grant • Only a situation where the subsidized amount is low enough

  7. International Food Subsidies • Several nations use a price-reducing subsidy to make food more affordable. • Programs that reduce the price of food benefit higher-income people as well. • Some nations only subsidize food that is typically consumed by the poor. • Some nations distribute food directly.

  8. The Impact of Government Assistance Programs on Incentive to Work • Grant ensures minimum level of income independent of work • Larger the grant size, greater is the disincentive to work • Because of income effect that makes work unfavorable • Transfers could cause people to work more or less depending on whether leisure is a normal good.

  9. The Impact of Government Assistance Programs on Incentive to Work • Economic Analysis can be conducted by using indifference curve with leisure and work for pay. • Leisure is engaging in any activity other than work for pay • Maximum leisure per day is 24 Hrs

  10. The Impact of Government Assistance Programs on Incentive to Work • Budget Line: Person’s opportunity for giving up leisure for work • Nonwage income is Zero • I = w(24-L) • Where I is income per day and L is leisure per day

  11. The Income Effect of a Transfer U3 U2 G U1 E2 E1 D Transfer Payment F C E3 A Income per Day 0 L1 L2 24 Leisure Hours per Day

  12. Implication • Increase in transfer payments induces individual to increase leisure hours and reduce wok per day.

  13. The Impact of Government Assistance Programs on Incentive to Work • Another work disincentive • The way benefits are reduced as individual earns more income • A subsidy of BD shifts the budget line up • From the point he will be paid Point C in figure

  14. A C E2 U2 E1 D U1 Maximum Daily Transfer B A Transfer that Declines with Earned Income • Subsidy shifts Budget Line up to CD and decreases its slope with more leisure • Meaning: Reduce the person’s real wage as he works less than 24-L* • Move from E1 to E2 after subsidy • Substitution as well as income effect • Work increases work income but reduces transfer income • An incentive to substitute • Decreases the opportunity cost of leisure • Low level of subsidies are desirable Income per Day L* L1 L2 24 Leisure Hours per Day

  15. Empirical Evidence • A 10% increase in welfare payments to individuals decreases work effort by 2%. • Even if welfare benefits are reduced substantially • Or rate at which they are phased out with earnings is reduced • The increase in work would be insufficient to reduce poverty

  16. A Negative Income Tax • A Negative Income Tax is a system where there is no status test but there is an income guarantee and a take-back rate. • A minimum income guarantee for everyone • People below the floor will receive subsidies, while above that people will pay taxes • Floor would vary with household size

  17. A Negative Income Tax • T= IG– tNIE Where • IG= Income guarantee • tN= take back rate • IE= earned income • T = Transfer

  18. Break-Even Income 0 = IG– tNIB IB= IG/tN

  19. Negative Income Tax

  20. A Negative Income Tax • Implication: • A very expensive program if IG is set at a reasonable level. • Assuming IGequal to $20, 000 per year for a family of four and tN= 50% • All families of four with income less than $40,000 will be eligible, specially in absence of status test • If tNis set lower to improve work incentive like 20% then the break-even income level would rise to $100,000 per year • Tax rates and prices of other Govt services would have to increase a lot to finance such activity

  21. A Negative Income Tax Plan Taxes Transfers 45º Annual Disposable Income (ID ) IG IB Annual Earned Income

  22. Wage Rate Subsidies • Wage Rate Subsidies are government additions to wages designed to increase the pay of the working poor.

  23. Wage Rate Subsidies

More Related