440 likes | 727 Views
MANOVA. Multivariate Analysis of Variance. One way Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). Comparing k p-variate Normal Populations. Comparing k mean vectors. Situation We have k normal populations Let denote the mean vector and covariance matrix of population i .
E N D
MANOVA Multivariate Analysis of Variance
One way Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) Comparing k p-variate Normal Populations
Comparing k mean vectors Situation • We have k normal populations • Let denote the mean vector and covariance matrix of population i. • i = 1, 2, 3, … k. • Note: we assume that the covariance matrix for each population is the same.
We want to test against
The data • Assume we have collected data from each of k populations • Let denote the nobservations from population i. • i = 1, 2, 3, … k.
The summary statistics Sample mean vectors Sample covariance matrices S1, S2, etc.
Computing Formulae: Compute 1) 2) 3)
4) 5)
Let = the Between SS and SP matrix
Let = the Within SS and SP matrix
1. Roy’s largest root This test statistic is derived using Roy’s union intersection principle 2. Wilk’s lambda (L) This test statistic is derived using the generalized Likelihood ratio principle
3. Lawley-Hotelling trace statistic 4. Pillai trace statistic (V)
Example In the following study, n = 15 first year university students from three different School regions (A, B and C) who were each taking the following four courses (Math, biology, English and Sociology) were observed: The marks on these courses is tabulated on the following slide:
Computations : 1) 2) 3)
4) =
5) =
Now = the Between SS and SP matrix
Let = the Within SS and SP matrix
In a Repeated Measures Design We have experimental units that • may be grouped according to one or several factors (the grouping factors) Then on each experimental unit we have • not a single measurement but a group of measurements (the repeated measures) • The repeated measures may be taken at combinations of levels of one or several factors (The repeated measures factors)
Example In the following study the experimenter was interested in how the level of a certain enzyme changed in cardiac patients after open heart surgery. • The enzyme was measured • immediately after surgery (Day 0), • one day (Day 1), • two days (Day 2) and • one week (Day 7) after surgery • for n = 15 cardiac surgical patients.
The data is given in the table below. Table: The enzyme levels -immediately after surgery (Day 0), one day (Day 1),two days (Day 2) and one week (Day 7) after surgery
The subjects are not grouped (single group). • There is one repeated measures factor -Time – with levels • Day 0, • Day 1, • Day 2, • Day 7 • This design is the same as a randomized block design with • Blocks = subjects
The Anova Table for Enzyme Experiment The Subject Source of variability is modelling the variability between subjects The ERROR Source of variability is modelling the variability within subjects
Example:(Repeated Measures Design - Grouping Factor) • In the following study, similar to example 3, the experimenter was interested in how the level of a certain enzyme changed in cardiac patients after open heart surgery. • In addition the experimenter was interested in how two drug treatments (A and B) would also effect the level of the enzyme.
The 24 patients were randomly divided into three groups of n= 8 patients. • The first group of patients were left untreated as a control group while • the second and third group were given drug treatments A and B respectively. • Again the enzyme was measured immediately after surgery (Day 0), one day (Day 1), two days (Day 2) and one week (Day 7) after surgery for each of the cardiac surgical patients in the study.
Table: The enzyme levels - immediately after surgery (Day 0), one day (Day 1),two days (Day 2) and one week (Day 7) after surgeryfor three treatment groups (control, Drug A, Drug B)
The subjects are grouped by treatment • control, • Drug A, • Drug B • There is one repeated measures factor -Time – with levels • Day 0, • Day 1, • Day 2, • Day 7
The Anova Table There are two sources of Error in a repeated measures design: The betweensubject error – Error1 and the withinsubject error – Error2
Tables of means Drug Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 7 Overall Control 118.63 77.88 60.50 55.75 78.19 A 103.25 68.25 52.00 51.50 68.75 B 103.38 69.38 54.13 51.50 69.59 Overall 108.42 71.83 55.54 52.92 72.18
Example: Repeated Measures Design - Two Grouping Factors • In the following example , the researcher was interested in how the levels of Anxiety (high and low) and Tension (none and high) affected error rates in performing a specified task. • In addition the researcher was interested in how the error rates also changed over time. • Four groups of three subjects diagnosed in the four Anxiety-Tension categories were asked to perform the task at four different times patients in the study.
The number of errors committed at each instance is tabulated below.