1 / 26

Promot ers M. Lacante, R. Van Esbroeck, W. Lens, M. De Metsenaere researchers

Immigrants in higher education. Factors determining study choices and success for first year immigrant students. Promot ers M. Lacante, R. Van Esbroeck, W. Lens, M. De Metsenaere researchers M. Almaci, M. De Schryver. Research purposes (1).

ifama
Download Presentation

Promot ers M. Lacante, R. Van Esbroeck, W. Lens, M. De Metsenaere researchers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Immigrants in higher education. Factors determining study choices and success for first year immigrant students Promoters M. Lacante, R. Van Esbroeck, W. Lens, M. De Metsenaere researchers M. Almaci, M. De Schryver

  2. Research purposes(1) • Problem:transfer from secondary to higher education and success rate of immigrant students in H.E. is problematic • Tinto model (1993): • Social and family background (SES,…) • Personal characteristics: skills and potential (cognitive, motivational, affective variables) • Earlier schooling • Process of choice • Academic and social integration

  3. Research purposes (2) • Participation of immigants in HE • Educational career in SE and HE of immigrants • Assess socio-economic profile of immigrants • Personality characteristics and background factors of immigrants in HE • Career choice process and motivation in final year SE • Process of integration in HE • Assess presence of risk factors • Profile of academic success and failure in HE

  4. Research methodology: identification of immigrants • Based on • Nationality • Place of birth • Family name • Secondary education in Belgium • Efficient in the case of non-European immigrants (error margin of 14%)

  5. Research methodology: Analysis of existing data banks • Loso-database: longitudinal research - started in 1989 • Drop out-database: 1999-2000 • SOHO-database: career choice development profiles in SE (2003-2004)

  6. Research methodology:New research (2004-2005) (1) • 4 universities – 3 institutions of HE (professional colleges) • Extra group of students from SOHO-project

  7. Research methodology:New research (2004-2005) (2) • 974 immigrant students = 5.8% of intake • Proportion varies from one institution to another: • proportion of immigrants higher in professional colleges (7.2% - 12.3%) • proportion at universities between 3.3% and 14% • Association Brussels has highest number of immigrant VUB 14% / EHB 12.3%. • ethnic composition varies from one institution to another: • proportion of TMA-students • EHB 55.2% and VUB 55.5% • other professional colleges: 51.8% - 56.1% • other universities: 18.3% - 36.4%

  8. Results(1) First year students HE: ethnicity by SES

  9. Results(2)Study choice • TMA-students opt more to go to university • Preference for Economics, law, psychology…

  10. Results(3)Academic success • average success rate: one quarter of immigrant students against one half of indigenous students • TMA-students: 19.4% success rate

  11. Low success rate is resulting from • Combination of factors • Family and background (SES, …) • Skills and potential • Process of choice • Academic and social integration

  12. Results (4)Background factors • SES and ethnic identity • TMA students: - low SES- high unemployment rate (SE: 76,4 % fathers unemployed) • SES and ‘objective’ ethnicity: - both predictive of educational results- interchangeable • Within immigrant group: SES not related to educational results • Within indigenous group: SES correlates with educ. results

  13. Results (5)Background factors • Study success by ethnicity and SES

  14. Results (6)Skills and potential • Type secundary education and school career are significant predictors of HE results

  15. Results(7)Skills and potential Delayed school career 54.9% of immigrant students entered HE at the usual time ↕ 79% of indigenous students

  16. Results(8)Skills and potential • Cognitive skills • Cognitive tests beginning SE: TMA-students scored lower on • Verbal • Numerical • Spatial • Language (HE): • Dutch as first language: 36 % success rate • another first language: 22 % success rate

  17. Results (9)Skills and potential • Learning skills and attitudes • Start SE: • No difference in motivation or interest in learning tasks • Less effort for learning • Less positive attitude to homework • HE: • Underestimate importance of effort • Spend less time on studies • Attend classes less • Prepared to undertake self-assessment • Lack of appropriate test strategies

  18. Recommendations(1) • Language • First language development often at lower level (cf. limited economic and cultural capital) • Priority attention • Standards at every level of education • Special projects:Tandem project; remedial language courses (ATHOS) • credits • Cognitive skills • Flexible learning paths in SE and HE

  19. Recommendations(2) • Learning skills and attitudes • To improve attitudes to homework and effort • Different educational and organisational approach in HE • Information and training in current test strategies

  20. Results: Process of choice • Unique importance • TMA-students • Gather less information • Fewer activities to support their choice • More doubts in environment • Positive view of own SE results • Reject advice of others • Reasons for choice more material and extrincic • Less satisfied with choices - more doubts – less identifciation with chosen option

  21. Recommendations: Process of choice(1) • Raising awareness of study choices in third grade • Broad exploration of study and career options • Realistic assessment of students’ own profile • Creation of a study choice file

  22. Recommendations:Process of choice (2) • Importance of role models • Use a buddy system • HE students • Involvement of parents and social environment • Recognise importance of reality testing • Accept professional support • Learn about HE system • Role of civil society (parents’ evenings)

  23. Results:Academic and social integration • No significant differences regarding well-being and relations with teaching staff. • TMA students identified more strongly with ‘own’ ethnic background • Positive relationship with other groups • Subjective ethnic identity and study success: • Belgians = 35% • TMA = 21%

  24. Recommendations:Academic and social integration • Offere extra curricular career choice activities • Strenghtening cross cultural group activities • SE: within class activities • HE: BRUTUS project

  25. General conclusion • A large number of mutually intertwined factors account for lower success rate • ‘Static’ factors (social background) are related to remediable factors (skills, attitudes, process of choice…) • Interventions may bring about changes

  26. Concluding comments TMA-students are • Ambitious • they aim high • stay longer in HE • are prepared to continue • Persistent • Remain longer in SE and HO • Intend to continue the chosen HE educational program even after failure

More Related