1 / 18

CICJIS

Integrated Justice and Homeland Security in CO Presented to the NGA’s Center for Best Practices Integrated Justice Workshop By Theresa Brandorff, Director, CICJISDirector, CIO Jim Lynn, CDPS CIO September 2003. CICJIS. Main CICJIS Benefit.

ilar
Download Presentation

CICJIS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Integrated Justice and Homeland Security in COPresented tothe NGA’s Center for Best PracticesIntegrated Justice WorkshopByTheresa Brandorff, Director, CICJISDirector, CIOJim Lynn, CDPS CIOSeptember 2003

  2. CICJIS

  3. Main CICJIS Benefit Getting the right information to the right people at the right time and place in the criminal justice process.

  4. CICJIS Information Sharing Main Components • Event triggered data transfers A warrant is entered by the courts (event) and it can be seen immediately by police on the street! • Information queries DA or Probation Officer can directly access a persons RAP Sheet, Driver History, and Current Status • Central Index Each agency has different business models – each agency has its own “language”– the CICJIS Central Index helps translate and communicate

  5. New Requirements • Information Sharing Model for the State • Enterprise Model for the State • Use Model for Homeland Security Information Sharing • Local and State Requirements • Use Model for Homeland Defense • Pilots with Northern Command (US NORTHCOM)

  6. Constraints • Time to Market • Existing technical solution • Cost • Efficiency/Effectiveness • Funding • State Budget Crisis • Traditional Justice Grants

  7. CICJIS & Homeland Security • U.S. Northern Command Informal Work Group • Information Requirements & Gap Analysis • Cyber Security Task Force • 9 State Regions • OPSFS • HLS Grant – livescan in every sheriff’s office • Pilots • JRIES, ACTD,

  8. Informal Information Sharing Working Group

  9. Communications Infrastructure SIPRNET NIPRNET INTERNET LEO NLETS GuardNet RISS SATCOM DISN

  10. Problem Statement • Communications interrupted • DoD insight was very limited • Limited Intelligence sharing • Slow Command, Control, and Coordination between DoD and Civil authorities

  11. HLS C2 ACTD Overview • History: • Pre-dates “911” attacks • Submitted as candidate in Feb 2001 • Approved for FY02 Start • Program Less Than One Year Old • 5 Year Program – 4 Thrust Areas • Assured Communications • Interoperability • Threat Attribution/Alert • Command, Control, & Coordination • Missions Supported • Homeland Defense, Military Assistance to Civil Authorities, Critical Infrastructure Protection and Antiterrorism/Force Protection • Stakeholders: • OSD, DISA, NSA, DTRA, NIMA, DIA • JFCOM/NORTHCOM • National Guard Bureau • Additional Participants: • Federal Agencies, State and Local Governments • NGO’s and commercial enterprises Fall Demonstration Locations/Participants • Program Schedule: • Stakeholder Meetings • Implementation Directive • Management Plan • Key Milestones: • Crisis Response Demonstration (April 23-25) • WALEX (June 25-26) • Fall Demo - Coastal Operations • Industry Day (Dec 3-4) • Pentagon – OPNAV and HQMC command centers • NORTHCOM • Tidewater, VA • JTF/CS, JBC • CINCLANTFLT, Navy Installations • Cities of Norfolk and Chesapeake • Virginia Port Authority • Louisiana • State EOC, State Police, Guard CST, Port Authority • Hawaii • CINCPACFLT, MARFORPAC, Pacific Disaster Ctr • California • San Diego Navy and Marine Installations • Washington • Seattle

  12. FEMA State US Marshals Secret Service EOC Nat'l Guard Responders FBI Federal DHS Goal: Move DoD’s Reaction Point Incident Local Regional DISA North Com DTRA NIMA NSA EOC INTEL COMM Reaction Point FIRST RESPONDERS DoD Prevention Deterrence Consequence Management Crisis Response Information Sharing/Intelligence Coordination Strong DoD/Federal/Civil interfaces will save lives, infrastructure, & resources

  13. Not Your Typical ACTD • National priority concern • HLS Requirements emerging • US NORTHCOM Command structure evolving • Technology may precede policy • Rapid prototyping/spiral development • Complex interagency interactions • DoD/Federal/State/Local/Commercial • Communications to the 1st Responder • Improve intelligence/information flow • Multi level information protection/release

  14. Area Security Operations C2 Workstation Situational Awareness Information Pull Information Push Operational Picture • Database access and GCCS Track Database Manager • Web Access/Portal • Common Operating Picture • Knowledge Board • Event visualization capabilities • Arc IMS feed view • Baseline Microsoft suite • SIPRNET approved

  15. What This ACTD Will Deliver Critical Operational Issues Potential Technologies Priority Network Access; Transportable Communications Ability to communicate through congestion and disruption Communications with Appropriate Assurance Private, protected information sharing between DoD, IC, Civil, State & Local agencies Scalable collaboration applications for all HLS echelons Decision Support Tools/CR2OP Intelligence Applications and Alert Function Intelligence sharing for attribution and prevention Collaboration Planning and Prediction Tools HLS planning and prediction for deterrence and crisis management Transition to Operations Representative HLS architecture

More Related