1 / 9

The Categorical Imperative

The Categorical Imperative. Who’s to blame?. Kantian theory on the categorical imperative. Every action has an underlying maxim A maxim is the rule you act on when carrying out an action

ilario
Download Presentation

The Categorical Imperative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Categorical Imperative Who’s to blame?

  2. Kantian theory on the categorical imperative • Every action has an underlying maxim • A maxim is the rule you act on when carrying out an action • E.g. if I stab someone who breaks into my house I am acting on the maxim “If someone breaks into my house, I must attack them”. • Criticisms?

  3. Criticisms of this idea • How can the maxim be determined? • Do people necessarily act on only one?

  4. The categorical imperative (part 1) • Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law. • Do not act on a maxim that does cannot display universalisability • Do not act on a maxim that you could not wish to be universal

  5. The categorical imperative (part 2) • Respect the goals of human beings rather than merely using them for your own purposes • Don’t treat a person as an object • Don’t use a person only to get what you want (they must benefit as much as you) • Don’t trick or deceive someone to achieve your ends

  6. Examples • Murder – • you could not reasonably wish for everyone to be able to kill anyone, therefore you should not kill people yourself • Resource use – • everyone cannot physically take double their share of resources, therefore you should not (notice that this is a practical statement from which a moral decision is drawn)

  7. Criticisms? • Honesty – a murderer asks where your friend is hiding, what would a good Kantian acolyte do? • Well surely this would mean that as we would seek for honesty to be universal, then we should tell him the truth. • What was Kant’s response?

  8. Kant’s response • He agreed with it, stating that morality is not defined by the outcome of actions • However, it is not necessary to lie, merely to tell the truth and say you cannot reveal it as it will harm your friend. • This comes back to the criticism of determining the maxim you are working on

  9. Debate points • Does the outcome affect the morality of the action? • Does the outcome influence the moral responsibility of the individual?

More Related