1 / 9

Potential Revisions 2007 checklist/protocol

Potential Revisions 2007 checklist/protocol. Stand-level Biodiversity. Constraints. Why collect this data? Modifies the total average retention. Would it have been left anyway?. Wetland RMZ RRZ Rock outcrop Non-commercial brush Non-merch Sensitive terrain. Invasive Plants.

iliana-burris
Download Presentation

Potential Revisions 2007 checklist/protocol

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Potential Revisions2007 checklist/protocol Stand-level Biodiversity

  2. Constraints • Why collect this data? • Modifies the total average retention

  3. Would it have been left anyway?

  4. Wetland • RMZ • RRZ • Rock outcrop • Non-commercial brush • Non-merch • Sensitive terrain

  5. Invasive Plants • How good is our data?

  6. When is a stratum a clear-cut? • If a stratum is CC: • No basal area equivalency • No windthrow, constraint or ecological anchor

  7. When do a few trees change the type to DO from CC? Proposal: If dispersed trees >0.1 ha patch then must call stratum dispersed. OK to call stratum with <0.1 ha of retention dispersed.

  8. # of trees = 0.1 ha patch

  9. CC/DO Conclusion • Don’t go to extremes to sample trees if likely <0.1ha equivalent • If in doubt – go ahead and label as DO • A CC label means you think any retention sums up to <0.1ha. • Tree found in plots (e.g. 30 m radius) should always be tallied

More Related