1 / 6

Contracts, Fall 2008

Contracts, Fall 2008. Class 24. Equitable Grounds not to Enforce a Contract. Problems with the parties Problems with the process Duress and undue influence Misrepresentation Problems with the substance Unconscionability Public policy Covenants not to compete Other Illegality

illias
Download Presentation

Contracts, Fall 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Contracts, Fall 2008 Class 24

  2. Equitable Grounds not to Enforce a Contract • Problems with the parties • Problems with the process • Duress and undue influence • Misrepresentation • Problems with the substance • Unconscionability • Public policy • Covenants not to compete • Other • Illegality • Sensitive subjects (surrogacy)

  3. Unconscionability • Need • Substantive Unconscionability • Procedural Unconscionability • A few courts; ‘substance is enough’- BUT still look for evidence of unequal bargaining power, lack of understanding, contract of adhesion, etc. • Could procedure ever be enough? Another doctrine would probably better cover… • BUT: waiver of jury trial might not be “knowing, voluntary and intelligent” – effect might be same as though procedure was enough

  4. Public Policy: covenants not to compete • Conflicting policy concerns • reluctance to limit how/where/when people work • reluctance to limit competition • special factors with doctors and lawyers • Interests of people to choose their doctors and lawyers • With lawyers, per se unreasonable to prohibit lawyer from representing client • desire to let employer get benefit of proprietary investment, etc. • Approach: balance respective interests

  5. Public Policy: Covenants Not to Compete • Restrict • A’s Activities • For x period of time • Over particular geographical range • Distinguish • Sale of business context • More apt to find covenant enforceable • Employer-employee context • Less apt to find covenant enforceable

  6. Covenants not to compete • Three approaches • Enforce in whole • Don’t enforce • Blue pencil • Strike objectionable provision • Modify objectionable provision • Cross out objectionable words (‘light blue pencil’) OR • If necessary change words

More Related