1 / 19

Ethical issues and the Three Rs

Helping animals through welfare science. Ethical issues and the Three Rs. Penny Hawkins Research Animals Department, RSPCA, UK phawkins@rspca.org.uk p. Promoting fuller implementation of the 3Rs: Replacement, Reduction & Refinement. Developing processes of ethical review.

ilya
Download Presentation

Ethical issues and the Three Rs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Helping animals through welfare science Ethical issues andthe Three Rs Penny Hawkins Research Animals Department, RSPCA, UK phawkins@rspca.org.uk p

  2. Promoting fuller implementation of the3Rs: Replacement, Reduction & Refinement Developing processes of ethical review

  3. Ethical framework in ASPA • ASPA establishes an ethical framework • assess and weigh harms and benefits • make decisions on justification and necessity • Different perspectives on harms and benefits • definitions of harms • ... and potential causes of harm

  4. The entire lifetime experience • Breeding protocols • Transport • Laboratory housing • Husbandry, care and environment • Handling and restraint • Identification • Phenotyping • Scientific procedures • Adverse after-effects • Euthanasia One person’s “best practice” can be another person’s baseline standard

  5. Benefits of medical research • Diseases cause suffering in humans • acute or chronic pain • distress due to mental disorders • physical degeneration • anxiety, distress, depression

  6. Justification • Alleviation of human suffering • Opinion polls show 70 % support animal research for medical progress • There are caveats associated with both of these • There is still a serious ethical dilemma associated with creating animal models of disease

  7. Reasons for reducing suffering • Animal welfare benefits • Better science • Economic benefits • Reassuring the beneficiaries of the research (patients and funders) • Legal requirements

  8. Approaches to refinement • Ensuring that adverse effects are fully recognised and taken into account • Thinking about animals’ basic needs • Defining an effective welfare assessment scheme; regularly and critically reviewing this

  9. What is it like to be …. • a golden retriever with Duchenne? • an MDX mouse? • a marmoset with Parkinson’s? • a rat with schizophrenia? • a geriatric mouse? • a diabetic rat with peripheral neuropathy?

  10. Predicting adverse effects Williams Syndrome: humans and mice

  11. Animals’ basic needs • Safe, predictable surroundings where they can control their environment and take refuge • Stable groups for social animals • Sufficient space for normal behaviours • A suitably stimulating environment that encourages species-specific behaviours (which also requires space)

  12. Noise stress • Noise from human activity induces behavioural and physiological stress responses in rodents • morphology of intestinal mucosa • porphyrin staining • changes in behavioural test paradigms • Working practices can make a significant difference, e.g. 10 to 15 dB Castelhano-Carlos & Baumans (2009) Laboratory Animals 43: 311-327 Voipio et al. (2006) Laboratory Animals 40: 400-409

  13. Enrichment effects • Analgesic self-administration study • C57BL mice • singly vs. groups of 3 • litter vs. litter, nesting material & gnaw sticks • Social housing and enrichment both reduced the need for post-op pain relief Pham et al. (2010) Physiology & Behaviordoi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.01.038

  14. Welfare assessment • Aim is to be consistent and objective • www.mousewelfareterms.org • A “team” approach • including input from animal technologists and care staff, researchers, veterinarians • Objective welfare indicators • Appropriate recording systems, e.g. “score sheets”

  15. Issues with welfare assessment • Many species are adapted to conceal signs of suffering • Nocturnal rodents usually observed when they should be asleep • Lack of awareness of what to look for and where to look

  16. Ongoing research... • “Flank twitch” post laparotomy • www.ahwla.org.uk • Rodents with no apparent cancer pain self-administer analgesics • Many observers concentrate on animals’ faces

  17. Principles of effective WA • Understanding of good welfare, species-specific behaviour and the “normal” animal • e.g. mice with analgesia post-surgery make well structured nests and defaecate outside them; mice without analgesia do not Arras et al. (2007) BMC Vet. Res. 3: 16 www.biomedcentral.com

  18. Keeping pace with new developments • All establishments need a formal mechanism for retrieving and assessing information • Ethical Review Process (ERP) • refinement/project based groups • animal care and use committees • Part of the commitment to reducing harms, improving welfare and improving science — and reassuring patients

  19. Thank you! www.rspca.org.uk/researchanimals

More Related