480 likes | 1.04k Views
Lecture 4 Atmospheric Radiative Transfer; Role of clouds on climate. GEU0136 Climatology. 2-Layer Atmosphere. Radiative Balances by Layer. For every layer: Energy In = Energy Out. TOA. L1. L2. Surface. 2-Layer B.B. Atmosphere (cont’d).
E N D
Lecture 4Atmospheric Radiative Transfer; Role of clouds on climate GEU0136 Climatology
Radiative Balances by Layer For every layer: Energy In = Energy Out TOA L1 L2 Surface
2-Layer B.B. Atmosphere (cont’d) • Solving energy budgets for all layers simultaneously gives • Recall from Lecture 3 that a 1 layer B-B atmosphere produces Ts4 = 2Te4 • In general, an n-layer B-B atmosphere will have Ts4 = (n+1)Te4 Vertical temperature profile for 4-layer atmosphere, with thin graybody layers at top and bottom. Very unrealistic lapse rate!! Why?
Molecular Absorbers/Emitters • Molecules of gas in the atmosphere interact with photons of electromagnetic radiation • Different kinds of molecular transitions can absorb/emit very different wavelengths of radiation • Some molecules are able to interact much more with photons than others • Different molecular structures produce wavelength-dependent absorptivity/emissivity
Atmospheric Absorption • Triatomic modelcules have the most absorption bands • Complete absorption from 5-8 mm(H2O) and > 14 mm(CO2) • Little absorption between about 8 mm and 11 mm (“window”)
Line Broadening • Molecular absorption takes place at distinct wavelengths (frequencies, energy levels) • Actual spectra feature absorption “bands” with broader features. Why? • Pressure broadening • Collisions among molecules dissipate energy as kinetic (Lorentz profile) • Doppler broadening • Relative motions among molecules and photons (Doppler profile)
Sun-Earth Geometry Sun’s rays q q j = d + q q d a a a
Terminology • Radiance is energy per unit solid angle, usually referred to in a given band of wavelengths • Flux (or irradiance) is the total energy passing through a plane(integral of radiance) • q = zenith angle • j azimuth angle • dw solid angle increment
Solar Absorption • Absorption depends on path length through the atmosphere, not vertical distance • dz = ds cos q • ds = dz / cos q
Beer’s Law (absorption) Exponential “decay” of radiation as it passes through absorbing gas (convert from ds to dz) (defineoptical depth) (optical depth is a convenient coord!)
Heating! Absorption Local flux Atmospheric Absorption and Heating (density of absorbing gas decreases with zH is scale height = RT/g) (optical depth as a function of height and mixing ratio of absorber) (differentiate and divide … simple relationship between optical depth and z) (Heating rate is proportional to flux divergence)
not 0 t/m = 1 Absorption (Heating) Rate (cont’d) Where is max heating?Find out by differentiating previous equation w.r.t. t, setting to zero, and solving for t • Maximum absorption occurs at level of unit optical depth • Higher in the atmosphere as sun is closer to horizon
Thermal Absorption and Emission • Upwelling terrestrial radiation is absorbed and emitted by each layer • As with solar radiation, path lengthds is the distance of interest, rather than dz • Also have to consider solid angle dw
For radiance of a given frequency n passing through a thin layer along a path ds emission absorption (Beer’s Law) emissivity Planck function Planck intensity Gathering terms: Infrared Radiative Transfer Kirchoff’s Law: an = en so en= rads kn
Infrared Radiative Transfer (cont’d) Previous result: Convert to z: Define optical depth from surface up: Rewrite result in t coordinate:
IR Radiative Transfer Schwarzchild’s Equation Previous result: Multiply by integrating factor
Interpretation for Schwarzchild’s Equation • Upwelling radiance at a given level has contributions from the surface and from every other level in between • Relative contributions are controlled by vertical profiles of temperature and absorbing gases Radiance at a given optical depth (z) and angle Sum of emissionsfrom each atm level weighted by absorptivity/emissivity of each layer in between Emissionfrom sfc Absorption below t
upwelling: blackbody emission(temperature dependence) transmission functions(emissivity and radiances) downwelling: Simple Form of Schwarzchild’s R.T.E. Integrate Schwarzchild across thermal IR and across all angles and make simplifying assumptions to obtain simpler expressions for upwelling and downwelling radiative fluxes
Net flux(z): Heating rate: IR Fluxes and Heating OLR and downward IR at surface depend on temperature profile and transmission functions TOA OLR IR at sfc
Transmission Functions and Heating • Think of upwelling and downwelling IR as weighted averages of sT4 • The change in transmission function with height is the weighting function • Downwelling IR at surface comes from lower troposphere • Upwelling IR at TOA comes from mid-upper troposphere • This is the very basis for the so-called “greenhouse effect” Vertical profiles of atmospheric LW transmission functions and temperature
Cloud Radiative Properties:Dependence on Liquid Water Path • Recall a + r + t = 1 • Thick clouds reflect and absorb more than thin (duh!) • Generally reflect more than absorb, but less true at low solar zenith angles
Cloud Radiative Properties:Dependence on Drop Size • Small droplets make brighter clouds • Larger droplets absorb more • Dependence on liquid water path at all droplet sizes too
Cloud Radiative PropertiesLongwave Emissivity • Clouds are very good LW absorbers. • Clouds with LWC > 20 g/m2 are almost blackbodies!
Radiative-Convective Models(a recipe) • Consider a 1-D atmosphere • Specify solar radiation at the top, emissivity of each layer • Calculate radiative equilibrium temperature for each layer • Check for static stability • If layers are unstable, mix them! • (e.g. if G > Gd, set both T’s to mass-weighted mean of the layer pair) • Add clouds and absorbing gases to taste en Tn … e3 T3 e1 T1 Manabe and Strickler (1964)
Radiative-Convective Equilibrium • Pure radiative equilibrium is way too hot at surface • Adjusting to Gd still too steep • Adjusting to observed 6.5 K km-1 produces fairly reasonable profile: • Sfc temp (still hot) • Tropopause (OK) • Stratosphere (OK)
Radiative-Convective EquilibriumEffect of Different Absorbers • Water vapor alone … atmosphere is cooler • H2O + CO2 … almost 10 K warmer • H2O + CO2 + O3 … stratosphere appears!
Radiative-Convective EquilibriumRadiative Heating Rates • L indicates longwave cooling • S indicates heating (by solar absorption) • NET combines all • Heating and cooling nearly balance in stratosphere • Troposphere cools strongly (~ 1.5 K/day) • How is this cooling balanced? • In the R.C.M? • In the real world?
Radiative-Convective EquilibriumEffects of Clouds • Clouds absorb LW • Clouds reflect SW • Which effect “wins?” • Depends on emitting T • For low clouds, sT4 ~ sTs4 , so SW effect is greater • For high clouds, sT4 << sTs4 so LW effect “wins” • High clouds warm • Low clouds cool Details are sensitive to optical properties and distributions of clouds, but remember the basic conclusions
Observed Mean Cloud Fraction high clouds( < 440 mb) • High clouds mostly due to tropical convection (Amazon, Congo, Indonesia, W. Pacific) • Low clouds (stratocumulus) over eastern parts of subtropical ocean basins • Cold SST • Subsiding air • Strong inversion low clouds( > 680 mb) all clouds
Annual Mean Cloud Forcing D OLR • “Cloud forcing” is defined as the difference between a “clearsky” and “all sky” measurement • At the surface, (a) is all warming, and (b) is all cooling • Net effect of clouds is to cool the surface, but changes can go either way D solar abs D Rnet
Global Mean Cloud Radiative Forcing • Clouds increase planetary albedo from 15% to 30% • This reduces absorbed solar by 48 W m-2 • Reduced solar is offset by 31 W m-2 of LW warming (greenhouse) • So total cloud forcing is –17 W m-2 • Clouds cool the climate. How might this number change if cloudiness increased?