1 / 38

an atmospheric “ mesoscale ”: where convection meets waves (rotation optional)

an atmospheric “ mesoscale ”: where convection meets waves (rotation optional). Brian Mapes University of Miami. for oceanographers. In a moist convecting atmosphere, small scale vertical motions don’t just carry fluxes, they cause latent heating

ince
Download Presentation

an atmospheric “ mesoscale ”: where convection meets waves (rotation optional)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. an atmospheric “mesoscale”:where convection meets waves(rotation optional) Brian Mapes University of Miami

  2. for oceanographers • In a moist convecting atmosphere, small scale vertical motions don’t just carry fluxes, they cause latent heating • OK, you can view it as a vertical flux of water substance upward past the condensation level. • Spectral space: energy injection across scales • Physical space: feedback small updrafts • UV catastrophe of conditional instability (Lilly 1961) • Smallest updrafts, broadest subsidence (Bjerknes 1938)

  3. mesoscale convection • “Mesoscale” convection events (meso = middle, in between L~H “convective” scale and N/fH “Rossby radius”) are less theoretically tidy than parcel or exp(ikx) UV catastrophe, but profound & real • convectively coupled internal waves

  4. 5 decades 3 decades Convectively coupled gravity waves in 2D CRMNo preferred hor. scale } Eureka! 5/3! Stefan Tulich (Mapes et al. 2009 JMSJ)

  5. ...pas? Scale Interactions cascade...

  6. mesoscale convection • Are these things coherent aspects (the spectral tail) of the large-scale flow, or an emergent metaphenomenon bubbling up from convection? • Implication: is it better to spend computing DOFs to resolve the mesoscale? Or rather on little hi-res but periodic “sample” patches of convective-scale flow, coupled across an enforced scale separation? • (MMF or “super-parameterization”)

  7. 3D global simulations • GEOS-5 global AGCM at 5km mesh size • by Bill Putman, Max Suarez, others at NASA GSFC • 20-day run analyzed here • Cubed sphere grid, nonhydrostatic • GCM physics left on – mostly • subgridscale plumes hobbled by entrainment • disabled subgridorographic gravity wave drag

  8. comparison to satellite imagery http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=44246&src=eoa-iotd predicted cloud features for February 6, 2010 2 weeks into simulation

  9. 5kmGCM: detailed examinations • 1. Tropical mesoscale rain events: case studies • One scale selected in to analysis: 250km events • Rebinrainrate to 2.5deg, find 10 largest maxima • in ~20 day simulation period (Jan-Feb 2010) • in 15N-15S, to minimize cyclone dominated cases • Extract space-time cubes around these events • (+/-18h, +/- 3 degrees) • 10 wettest cases, plus composite mean case • 2. Vertical flux [wq], partitioned by scale • through simple coarse-graining (rebinning)

  10. http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/personal/ssong/research/HR_250kmevents.htmhttp://www.rsmas.miami.edu/personal/ssong/research/HR_250kmevents.htm

  11. animation

  12. Tropical cyclone: 1 case in top 10 (in 15N-15S belt, 250km scale)

  13. http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/personal/ssong/research/HR_250kmevents.htmhttp://www.rsmas.miami.edu/personal/ssong/research/HR_250kmevents.htm

  14. Anim: composite of 10 cases

  15. 99% is from resolved condensation process: good • m composite basis HOURS RELATIVE TO MAX 250km RAIN

  16. Tropical radar observations (EPIC 2001)Time scale is hours even for small space scalesMesoscale is real (if broadband) 96km radius cell: <1h 8km radius MCS: 10h Mapes and Lin 2006 MWR

  17. m HOURS RELATIVE TO MAX 250km RAIN

  18. T’(t,p): 250km area mean p (hPa) leading nose HOURS RELATIVE TO MAX 250km RAIN

  19. 250km water vapor mixing ratio (t,p) W

  20. Low-level “valve” on convection

  21. RH(t,p) p (hPa) W W HOURS RELATIVE TO MAX 250km RAIN

  22. trimodal: shallow, medium, deep similar to obs (if a bit off in exact heights) Mapes et al. 2006 DAO

  23. GCRM detailed examinations • 1. Tropical mesoscale rain events: case studies • One scale built in to analysis: 250km • Rebinrainrate to 2.5deg, find 10 largest maxima • in ~20 day simulation period (Jan-Feb 2010) • in 15N-15S, to minimize cyclone dominated cases • Extract space-time cubes around these • (+/-18h, +/- 3 degrees) • 10 cases, and composite mean case • 2. Vertical enthalpy flux, partitioned by scale • through simple coarse-graining (rebinning)

  24. 2. Enthalpy flux • Enthalpy = sensible heat + latent heat • CpT + Lqv • Flux thru 500mb level balances ~23 Wm-2 radiativecooling above that level • sensible heat flux Cp [wT] ~ 7 Wm-2 • latent heat flux L [wq]: ~ 16 Wm-2 • destined to condense up there

  25. Latent flux across 500mb snapshot by scales resolved in 80kmrebinning sub-80km = total flux minus the above

  26. Latent flux snapshot by scales resolved in 250kmrebinning sub-250km = total explicit flux minus above

  27. Latent flux snapshot by scales resolved in 500 km rebinning sub-500km = total explicit flux minus above

  28. sub-80km and super-80km scales conspire to carry flux: convection occurs in mesoscale clusters

  29. Flux partitoned by scales • Vapor flux by convective (5-80km) scales is colocated with flux in >80km scale mesoscale updrafts. • Small scales mainly just add a bit (10 - 40%) to the flux by mesoscale mean updrafts • Might this be true at still-finer scales? • Borrowed slides (with permission, and email discussion last 2 days) from Chin-Hoh Moeng (NCAR)

  30. Marat Khairoutdinov (Stony Brook) ran “Giga-LES” • Moeng et al. 2009, 2010 JAMES

  31. Split the LES flow into: “resolvable” grid-scale (GS) & “unresolved” scale (SGS) apply “smoothing” Giga-LES CRM resolvable SGS is the difference. Moeng et al. 2010 JAMES

  32. GS: CRM-grid scales SGS: CRM-SGS SGS(w-var) Apply “smoothing” with a width of 4 km GS most of w-kinetic energy in SGS SGS(q-var) GS SGS (wq-cov) ~ half of moisture flux in SGS GS large scales small scales Moeng et al. 2010 JAMES

  33. SGS flux Moeng et al. 2010- JAMES

  34. SGS flux is in clouds • condensedwater path (vertical integral) Moeng et al. 2009 JAMES

  35. Flux partitoned by scales • Vapor flux by convective (5-80km) scales is colocated with flux in >80km scale mesoscale cloud system updrafts. • Small scales mainly just add a bit (up to 40%) to the flux by mesoscale mean updrafts • Vapor flux by sub-convective (0.1-4km) scales is colocated with >4km scale convective cloud updrafts. • Small scales mainly just add a bit (~40%) to the flux by convective mean updrafts

  36. Flux part summary • Mesoscale updrafts are moist, fluxing q up • Convective updrafts are inside, adding to it • Sub-drafts inside the convective drafts: ditto • Q: How might poorly-resolved convection be distorted by having to carry the flux of missing sub-scales? (and can param’z’n fix it?) • Q2: Is subgridparam’z’n a flux amplifier? Is that safe numerically?

  37. Summary • Deep convection – gravity wave interactions are common: a “mesoscale” • Broadband (meso synoptic, in tropics) • -5/3, but NOT a swirls-advecting-vorticity cascade • has a velocity scale, not a length scale • multicellular: hours, not minutes (not just H/w) • “Mesoscale convection”, convective cells, and sub-cellular drafts all conspire to carry geophysically (radiatively) demanded vertical energy flux • Do we need to resolve them all? Or might truncation + parameterization suffice?

More Related