1 / 3

RMCRT

RMCRT. Isotropic scattering added to the model Verification testing performed using an exact solution (Siegel, 1987) Grid convergence analysis performed Discrepancy diminishes with increased mesh refinement. RMCRT Results.

ince
Download Presentation

RMCRT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RMCRT • Isotropic scattering added to the model • Verification testing performed using an exact solution (Siegel, 1987) • Grid convergence analysis performed • Discrepancy diminishes with increased mesh refinement

  2. RMCRT Results RMCRT (dots) vs. Exact solution (lines) for varying optical thicknesses and scattering albedos for Siegel’s benchmark case (Siegel, 1987). Grid convergence of the L1 error norms for the Siegel case where the scattering coefficient is 8 m-1, and the absorption coefficient is 2m-1. Seigel, R. “Transient Radiative Cooling of a droplet-filled layer,” vol 109, pp. 159-164,

  3. RMCRT ON IFRF • Timing and accuracy studies of RMCRT vs. DOM are currently under way • Will serve as a way to compare the quality of the results from RMCRT vs DOM in a realistic case

More Related