140 likes | 261 Views
Linking planning, policy and budgets : experience with MTEFs. Public Expenditure Analysis & Management Seminar, May 22-24, 2001 Allister Moon ECSPE. MTEF objectives. Aggregate fiscal discipline: an instrument to support sustained stabilisation
E N D
Linking planning, policy and budgets : experience with MTEFs Public Expenditure Analysis & Management Seminar, May 22-24, 2001 Allister Moon ECSPE
MTEF objectives • Aggregate fiscal discipline: an instrument to support sustained stabilisation • Strategic allocation: strengthening policy competition and predictability in budget strategy • Technical efficiency: an instrument for enhancing public sector accountability
Development of an MTEF : Uganda 1992-01 • 1992 -94 Macroeconomic framework , + selective treatment of medium term allocation (eg wage bill, defence, roads) • 1995 - 97 Macro framework plus comprehensive sector allocations, linked to sector policy objectives(eg UPE, PEAP) • 1998- annual consultations on MTEF with donors, legislature, civil society
Aggregate fiscal discipline • Comprehensive and realistic macroframework • Multi year perspective on aggregate resources, expenditure envelopes • Ensuring consistency between resources and aggregate policy commitments
Strategic allocation (1) • Decisionmaking process: • transparent, contestable, • Cabinet level • early in the budget cycle • binding for resource ceilings in annual budget preparation • Increase in predictability of sector financing
Strategic allocation (2) • Sector expenditure plans, linking policy to budgets • Multi year • Integrated (eg local/external financing, capital/recurrent, wage/non wage) • Linking inputs/outputs/outcomes
Accountability • Shifting focus to outputs, rationalisation of controls on inputs • Publication of the framework • Public announcement of outputs, monitorable performance targets, • Focal point for dialogue on budget strategy with legislature and civil society
Preconditions for beginning MTEF • Macroeconomic stability • Predictability of aggregate expenditure envelope • Commitment from Cabinet • Core capacity in finance ministry/central agencies
Preconditions for progress with MTEF • Capacity to enforce hard budget constraint at sector/ministry level (systems capacity and political will) • Executive commitment to a more transparent budget process • Capacity in sector policy analysis and expenditure planning • Supportive donor behaviour
Supporting an MTEF: supply • Strategies for PE work which focus on long term strengthening of PEM capacity • Delivering advisory support within the time constraints of the budget cycle • Refocussing sector work to strengthen base for sector expenditure plans
Supporting an MTEF: demand • Use the MTEF as a reference for policy dialogue and program design • Encourage Government’s use of the MTEF in donor coordination • Promoting access and role of civil society in MTEF process
Could have done better? • Hazards of restructuring the budget cycle with external players • Earlier , more systematic attention to problems in budget execution • integration problems : wage bill, development budget • scope for acceleration?
Special factors? • Strong presidency, strong presidential commitment • MFEP management • absence of donor conditionality?
Lessons from experience • Commitment from central agencies • Full integration in budget process • Incrementalism : delivering ‘interim’ results • Develop ‘bottom up’ sectoral coverage in step with increasing predictability • Prepare for engagement of players outside the executive • Plan for long haul