1 / 24

Workshop on Metadata Standards and Best Practices

This workshop discusses the importance of metadata in research data centers (RDCs), potential solutions, examples, and conclusions. It highlights the need for high-quality metadata to promote dynamic research and capture the research process.

ingridr
Download Presentation

Workshop on Metadata Standards and Best Practices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Workshop on Metadata Standards and Best PracticesNovember 19-20th, 2007Session 3Researcher Metadata in RDCs Pascal Heus Open Data Foundation pheus@opendatafoundation.org http://www.opendatafoundation.org

  2. Outline • RDC Needs • Metadata in RDCs • Potential solutions • Examples • Conclusions / Q&A Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  3. RDC Overview • Provide an environment for the researcher to perform the in depth analysis of data in the most efficient way • Simple access to data file and codebook is insufficient • Need a high quality metadata and collaborative environment to promote dynamic research • Should capture the research process • Provide benefits to all stakeholders: producers, librarians, researcher, general public, etc. Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  4. Metadata and the survey life cycle • A survey is not a static process • It dynamically evolved across time and involves many players • It extends to aggregate data to reach decision makers • Metadata is crucial to capture knowledge Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  5. Importance of metadata Imagine a world without metadata…. • Users would say: • I can’t find the right data! How do I get access? • Where is the report / questionnaire / methodology? • I don’t understand this survey / file / variable • I can’t merge the files • How do I weight the data? • My results don’t match the report, I can’t reproduce the same results • Are these things comparable? • I didn’t know someone did this research before? • Sounds familiar? • Metadata is an answer to a researcher’s frustrations • Producers and archivists are making efforts to improve metadata but similarly, metadata must also be captured by researchers (Life Cycle!) Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  6. When to capture metadata? • Metadata must be captured at the time the event occurs! • Documenting after the facts leads to considerable loss of information • This is true for producers and researchers Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  7. Metadata and the Replication standard • Replication standard • Gary King, Harvard, 1995http://gking.harvard.edu/projects/repl.shtml • "The replication standard holds that sufficient information exists with which to understand, evaluate, and build upon a prior work if a third party can replicate the results without any additional information from the author." • The only way to understand and evaluate an empirical analysis fully is to know the exact process by which the data were generate • Replication dataset include all information necessary to replicate empirical results • Metadata crucial to meet the standard • Composed of documentation and structured metadata • Undocumented data is useless Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  8. RDC issues • Without producer metadata • researchers can’t work discover data or perform efficient work • Without researcher metadata • producer don’t know about data usage and quality issues • Other researcher are not aware of what has been done • Without standards • Information can’t be properly managed and exchanged between agencies or with the public • Without tools: • Can’t capture and preserve/share knowledge Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  9. RDC Metadata Framework Producers Researcher RDC RDC RDC External users 1. Producer provide data & basic docs 2. Need to enhance existing metadata 3. Start capturing researcher metadata 4. Knowledge grows and gets reused 5. Provides usage and quality feedback to producer / RDC 6. Repeat across surveys/topics 7. Metadata facilitates output Research Output 8. Public metadata facilitates data discovery / fosters global knowledge Research Metadata 9. Metadata exchange between agencies Public Use metadata Producer/Archive Metadata Data Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  10. RDC Solutions • Metadata management • Adopt standards and provide researcher with comprehensive metadata • Use related tools to capture research process • Collaborative environment • Used web technologies to foster a dynamic research environment • Connected and Remote enclaves • Connect RDCs through secure networks • Consider virtual data enclave • Data disclosure • Protect respondent through sound data disclosure techniques • Train providers / researchers Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  11. Simple techniques • Starts with good practices • File and variable naming conventions (embed metadata) • Code documentation • Good statistical methods • Web tools • Take advantage of common web technologies • Organize: calendar, events & news, task/todo • Knowledge capture/sharing: shared document/script libraries, wiki, blogs, discussion groups, citation bases, etc. Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  12. Coding and naming conventions (1) • Give meaningful names to files • Avoid spaces in names, don’t use upper case • Version your files (capture progress) • Use “middle” extensions • Include metadata in the name • Not too good: • report.doc, notes.txt • myfile.dta, table2.xls • reg.do, test.do,, results. • Better • usda_arms_2005_final_report_v200607.doc • usda_arms_results_v200706.dta , usda_farms_by_crop.xls, • income_regression_v200706.do Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  13. Coding and naming conventions (2) • Give meaningful names to variables • Not too good: • tmp3, ag_exp2, v324 • Better: • valid_enterprise, agricultural_expenditure, s1q3 • Avoid complex code • Comments, comments, comments!! • Make sure to include lots of comments in your source code • This is the best time to capture knowledge! • It also promotes replicability and will help you in a few months when to try to remember what you did • Share source code, use peer review Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  14. Not so good code example local mypath = “c:\data\anonymization\" global data_in = "`mypath'" + "\" + "Demohh1000.dta" global data_out = "`mypath'" + "\" + "Demohh1000.out.dta" global threshold = 0.8 cd $mypath set more off use $data_in, clear tempfile temp gen fk=1 gen wi=weight collapse (sum) fk wi, by (town province marstat sex age) gen pk=fk/wi gen qk=1-pk gen rk= (pk/qk) * log(1/pk) if fk==1 replace rk= (pk/(qk^2)) * ((pk*log(pk))+qk) if fk==2 replace rk=(pk/(2*(qk^3))) * (qk*(3*qk-2) - (2*pk^2)*log(pk)) if fk==3 #delimit ; replace rk= (pk/fk) * (1+ (qk/(fk+1)) + ((2*qk^2) / ((fk+1)*(fk+2))) + ((6*qk^3) / ((fk+1)*(fk+2)*(fk+3))) + ((24*qk^4) / ((fk+1)*(fk+2)*(fk+3)*(fk+4))) + ((120*qk^5) / ((fk+1)*(fk+2)*(fk+3)*(fk+4)*(fk+5))) + ((720*qk^6) / ((fk+1)*(fk+2)*(fk+3)*(fk+4)*(fk+5)*(fk+6))) + ((5040*qk^7) / ((fk+1)*(fk+2)*(fk+3)*(fk+4)*(fk+5)*(fk+6)*(fk+7)))) if fk>3 ; Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  15. Better code example /** * Computes the disclosure risk at individual level * * @author John Anonymous (janon@example.org) * @version 2007.06 * References: * - micro-Argus 4.1 manual, p27-25 */ // Configuration local mypath = “C:\data\anonymization\" global data_in = "`mypath'" + "\" + "Demohh1000.dta" global data_out = "`mypath'" + "\" + "Demohh1000.out.dta" global threshold = 0.8 // Initialize cd $my_path set more off // Load the data use $data_in, clear tempfile temp Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  16. Canada RDC Project • Consists of 14 Research Data Centres Centres, 6 branch RDCs and the Federal Research Data Centre in Ottawa • Data provided by Statistics Canada • RDC are now connected through a high speed secure network • Project to adopt a DDI 3.0 based metadata framework for survey documentation and research work and sponsor development of tools • ODaF providing technical assistance • http://www.statcan.ca/english/rdc/index.htm Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  17. The Canada RDC Research Life Cycle Project Application Research Commun- icatons Project Approval Output Disclosure Analysis Stages in the life cycle Managing Data Stages Project Creation Generate Analysis Files Access to Data [Chuck Humphrey, University of Alberta] Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  18. Metadata in Canada RDC Security Security Researcher Producer Analyst Other researchers Policy Makers General Public … RDC 1 8 2 3 5 4 Original Survey Master Survey Virtual Survey Research Output Publication Conferences … 8 7 6 6 • Producer makes survey available • Analyst packages for RDC • Researcher gets access and reshapes the data • Researcher perform complex analysis • Researchers publishes results • Information flowing in/out and activities are controlled and monitored • Outside users get access to the research output • Analyst includes results, activity, feedbackand reports to the producer The information flow relies on metadata and also generates new information that must be captured!! Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  19. Metadata Framework in Canada RDC Tables 2.0 / 3.0 DDI 3.0 2.0 ORIGINAL Editor Repurpose VIRTUAL Analysis OUTPUT Disclosure Legacy Question Version Other Metadata Mining SPSS, SAS, Stata Quality MASTER Log Report Concepts Group Compare Resources Training Documentation Project Admin Audit Logs Communication Collaborative Intranet Metadata Management Virtual File System Security i18n Storage Query Registry Exchange Data Files Authorization Authentication Original Survey Master Survey Virtual Survey Research Output Publication Conferences … Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  20. NORC Data Enclave • National Opinion Research Center • provides a secure environment within which authorized researchers can access sensitive microdata remotely from their offices or onsite • Data from National Institute for Standards and Technology’s (NIST) Technology Innovation Program (TIP), the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, and the Economic Research Service at the US Department of Agriculture • Possibly the first virtual data enclave • http://dataenclave.norc.org Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  21. NORC Virtual Enclave Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  22. Benefits (1) • Data documentation • Through good metadata practices, comprehensive documentation is available to the researchers • Preservation, integration and sharing of knowledge • Research process is captured and preserved in harmonized format • Research knowledge becomes integrant part of the survey and available to others • Producer gets feedback from the data users (usage, quality issues) • Reduce duplication of efforts and facilitates reuse Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  23. Benefits (2) • Research outputs and dissemination • Facilitate production of research outputs • Facilitate dissemination and fosters broader visibility of research outputs • Exchange of information • Metadata exchange between RDC, producers, librarians • Importance of public metadata for sensitive datasets • Facilitate data discovery (inside and outside RDC) Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

  24. Conclusions • Metadata plays a crucial roles in RDC’s • Benefits all stakeholders • Better use of the data (return on investment) • Improves research quality • Foster production of high quality data (more relevant and accurate) accompanied by comprehensive metadata • Adopting good practices may mean changing the way you work • This requires good change management techniques and discipline • But the benefits are worth the effort Open Data Foundation – IZA 2007/11

More Related