120 likes | 342 Views
City of Philadelphia Division of Social Services. Cross-Systems Financing Purchasing Plan Department of Behavioral Health/Mental Retardation Services and Department of Human Services. Target Population. Youth in residential treatment for more than 1 year; and,
E N D
City of PhiladelphiaDivision of Social Services Cross-Systems Financing Purchasing Plan Department of Behavioral Health/Mental Retardation Services and Department of Human Services
Target Population • Youth in residential treatment for more than 1 year; and, • Between the ages of 16 – 18; and, • Are in the custody of DHS as dependent or delinquent or both • Require a range of community-based supports, specialized treatment, and a host of vocational, educational and recreational services.
Assumptions Driving the Purchasing Plan • Currently, all youth in RTF placement (Levels I, II and III) are funded through Medicaid (CBH). • Medicaid can not support non-behavioral health services such as supported independent living, transitional living, vocational/educational, mentoring/peer support or other life skills supports many youth require. • Youth with specialized needs such as co-occurring mental retardation, history of sex offending behavior, and co-occurring medical require a mix of behavioral health, mental retardation, child welfare supports that need to be funded by the multiple agencies.
Assumptions (continued) • There is a lack of provider capacity to develop specialized programs as well as to treat many of the clinically complexities of these youth. • There is a lack of sustainability for many of the youth who require life long supports, particularly youth with co-occurring mental retardation. • Waiting lists for mental retardation services are extremely long (800 residential and 3900 community-based) that the other systems (CBH and DHS) have to provide the care.
Assumptions (continued) • Medical necessity shifts to “life” necessity reinforcing treatment but requiring the development and support of youth in all domains of their life. • Assessment and planning for these youth have been completed separate from rather than in partnership with the different departments within the Division of Social Services causing: • Lack of information that could have guided treatment differently. • Lack of bringing together resources early on that could have resulted in better placement decisions. • Lack of understanding the family dynamics and the possibility of using them as a resource for discharge planning.
Current Reality (Original Goals versus Actual Performance) • Goal: To integrate services, supports, planning and resource development between DHS and DBH/MRS. • Actual: • Change in leadership. • Lack of shared information. • Lack of mechanism to care manage those youth involved in both systems.
Current Reality (continued) • Goal: To integrate funding streams to develop a “pool” of resources to fund specialized services for aging out youth. • Actual: • Funding is limited to state regulations that do not allow “blending” currently. • Restrictions to funding disallow creativity. The use of reinvestment is good on a case-by-case basis but not for sustainability and prevents the ability to develop overall capacity.
Current Purchasing Plan • The following are expenditures for Residential Treatment for the 44 youth who represent the target group. • DBH/MRS: $ 3,774,100 • DHS: $ 837,000 • Education $ Unknown • MRS $ 9,000 (9 youth) • Expenditures for RTF placement for calendar year 2006 is $ 3,774,100 compared to $1,976,515 in 2005.
Proposed Purchasing Plan • Plan (Part A): • To coordinate funding so that all 44 youth targeted for this effort receive comprehensive assessments in the areas of: • Life Skills • Level of Functioning • Medical • Behavioral Health (MH and D&A) • Education • Family Support
Proposed Purchasing Plan • Plan (B): Identify for each youth based upon the holistic assessments the: • Type of supports • Cost of supports • Funding sources available/needed • Providers that can support the plan • Funding this would be part Medicaid, Education and DHS.
Proposed Purchasing Plan • Plan (Part C): To create the provider capacity to respond to the individual plans of these aging out youth (16-18) • Case rate model/RFP process to recruit providers that can provide the continuum and array of services and supports identified in the plan. • Providers must submit a plan that will respond to the needs of the youth. • Performance-based contracting to ensure response to plan is appropriate.
Funding Options • Moving youth from institutional care to community-based programs will decrease City match and increase State reimbursement. • Frees up City dollars to develop after-school, recreational, vocational supports etc.