150 likes | 299 Views
Dwight Henderson, Director dwight.henderson@nnsa.doe.gov (301 ) 903-4393// GTN A-119. NNSA Project Reviews NNSA Office of Project Analysis, Oversight, and Review (NA-APM-1.1) June 7, 2017. APM -1.1 Origin, Mission , & Function.
E N D
Dwight Henderson, Directordwight.henderson@nnsa.doe.gov (301) 903-4393// GTN A-119 NNSA Project ReviewsNNSA Office of Project Analysis, Oversight, and Review (NA-APM-1.1)June 7, 2017
APM-1.1Origin, Mission,& Function A mission support organization that ensures NNSA projects deliver safe, quality construction on budget. • Project Reviews are with us to stay • NNSA is required by DOE Order 413.3B to conduct reviews of Capital Asset Projects • NA-APM-1.1 was established in 2011to address DOE/NNSA/Congress/GAO concerns • Independent from the requirements owner (NA-10, 20, 50, etc.) • Independent from Project Execution (NA-APM-1, 20) • NNSA BOP 06.04 identifies three (3) classes of reviews to meet these requirements: • Independent Project Reviews (IPRs), • Annual Peer Reviews (APRs), and • Technical Independent Project Reviews (TIPRs) • Responsible for reviews onCapital AssetProjects > the GPP threshold
Office of Project Analysis, Oversight and Review NA-APM-1.1Dwight Henderson Office of Acquisition Management NA-APM-10Kim Gallegos CMRR Project Management Office NA-APM-1.5Everett Trollinger MOX Project Management Office NA-APM-1.4 Scott Cannon UPFProject Management Office NA-APM-1.3Dale Christenson Office ofEnterpriseProject Management NA-APM-20Cameron Manning NA-APM Organization Chart Associate Administrator NA-APM Bob Raines Principal Deputy Administrator NA-2 William ‘Ike’ White 3
Planning for Project Reviews • APM-1.1’s Review Schedule is done annually, updated quarterly • Review Committees are staffed in a continuous process • Participate as a Review Subcommittee Member or as an Observer • Project Reviews are added and sometimes deleted from our schedule • FPD’s are responsible to make the dates work for them • Charge Memo will be prepared six (6) weeks prior to a review and sent to the Program Office and FPD for concurrence
Project Review Subcommittees:Areas of Focus • Project reviews allow opportunities for continuous improvement across these five (5) areas of focus. • Project Reviews help the FPD maintain confidence that project systems, processes, and technical efforts are integrated and effectively coordinated. • Reviews also ensure that the project is progressing in step with established baselines. Feedback
Technical Subcommittee • Bulk Chemical Systems • Structural and Seismic, NPH • Engineering and Design • Civil/Structural • Electrical Power Systems, I&C • Construction Management • Technological Readiness • Criticality Safety • Chemical Safety • Mining Engineering • LEED and Sustainable Design • Technology, design, and nuclear safety • Confinement and Ventilation/Containers • Design/Construction • Safety in Design • Fire Protection • Rad Protection • Nuclear Safety Basis • Construction Management • ALARA process • Hazards Analysis • Physical Security
CSR Subcommittee • Cost estimating • Funding analysis • Schedule estimating • Risk Identification and Management • Risk Analysis • EVMS
M&A Subcommittee • Project Management Systems, Controls, and Planning • Subcontractor Management and Oversight • Capital Asset Acquisition • Acquisition Planning • Contract Administration • Long Lead Procurements • Experience working with IAs and other Federal partners (e.g., USACE) • Configuration Management and Document Control, Project Controls • Experience with contract types, including CPFF, CPIF, CPAF, FFP and T&M
ESH&QA Subcommittee • Nuclear Quality (NQA-1) and Quality Assurance • Commercial Dedication and Grading • Environmental Management, NEPA • Permitting (NPDES, State and Local) • QA Programs and Procedures • Worker Safety and Health, Industrial Hygiene • Safeguards and Security • 10 CFR 851
Cx Subcommittee • Startup and Turnover • Transition to Operations • RCAPTS • Project Closeout • Demolition and Decommissioning (D&D)