1 / 1

A SAE JA1011 compliant RCM Decision Algorithm

A SAE JA1011 compliant RCM Decision Algorithm. S afety, health, or environmental consequences?. H idden consequences?. O perational consequences?. N on-operational consequences?. N. N. N. Y. Y. Y. Y.

iria
Download Presentation

A SAE JA1011 compliant RCM Decision Algorithm

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A SAE JA1011 compliant RCM Decision Algorithm Safety, health, or environmental consequences? Hidden consequences? Operational consequences? Non-operational consequences? N N N Y Y Y Y CBM?Can CBM reliably detect the 'failing' state early enough to reduce the probability of a multiple failure to a tolerable level? Does it make economic sense to perform this task at the frequency required? CBM?Can CBM reliably detect the 'failing' state early enough to reduce the failure's probability and/or its consequences to a tolerable level? Does it make economic sense to perform this task at the frequency required? CBM?Can CBM reliably detect the 'failing' state early enough to reduce the failure's probability and/or its consequences to a tolerable level? Does it make economic sense to perform this task at the frequency required? CBM?Can CBM reliably detect the 'failing' state early enough to reduce the failure's probability and/or its consequences to a tolerable level? Does it make economic sense to perform this task at the frequency required? N N N N TBM? Is there an age (useful life) at which the probability of failure due to this failure mode increases rapidly, and do most items survive to this age? Can a routine (TBM) economically feasible task reduce the failure's probability and/or its consequences to a tolerable level? TBM? Is there an age (useful life) at which the probability of failure due to this failure mode increases rapidly, and do most items survive to this age? Can a routine (TBM) economically feasible task reduce the failure's probability and/or its consequences to a tolerable level? TBM? Is there an age (useful life) at which the probability of failure due to this failure mode increases rapidly, and do most items survive to this age? Can a routine (TBM) economically feasible task reduce the failure's probability and/or its consequences to a tolerable level? TBM? Is there an age (useful life) at which the probability of failure due to this failure mode increases rapidly, and do most items survive to this age? Can a routine (TBM) task reduce the multiple failure's probability and/or its consequences to a tolerable level? Is the task economiically feasible? N N N N Two?Will the combination of 2 or more TBM and CBM tasks be effective (avoid or reduce the safety consequences to a tolerable level)? Are they applicable (practical and economically feasible)? NSM?No time nor condition based activities need be scheduled. NSM?No time nor condition based activities need be scheduled. Failure detection?Is a detection task applicable? Will it reduce the multiple failure's probability to a tolerable level. Is it practical and economically feasible to perform the task at the required frequency? N N N N Redesign of the asset and / or its operational procedures is optional. Redesign of the asset and / or its operational procedures is optional. Redesignis mandatory if the multiple failure can have health, safety, or environmental consequences. Optional otherwise. Redesign of the asset and / or its operational procedures is mandatory

More Related