1 / 10

Y-G.Hong , J-S.Youn ETRI IETF-78 netext Meeting @MAASTRICHT 2010.07.28

Scenarios of the usage of multiple home network prefixes on a logical interface draft-hong-netext-scenario-logical-interface-01. Y-G.Hong , J-S.Youn ETRI IETF-78 netext Meeting @MAASTRICHT 2010.07.28. Goals of this draft.

iria
Download Presentation

Y-G.Hong , J-S.Youn ETRI IETF-78 netext Meeting @MAASTRICHT 2010.07.28

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Scenarios of the usage of multiple home network prefixes on a logical interfacedraft-hong-netext-scenario-logical-interface-01 Y-G.Hong, J-S.Youn ETRI IETF-78 netext Meeting @MAASTRICHT 2010.07.28

  2. Goals of this draft • To describe various scenarios of the usage of a logical interface in a LMA side and a MN side • Scenarios 1 - LMA acknowledges each physical interface of a MN • Scenarios 2 - LMA acknowledges a logical interface of a MN • Scenarios 3 - All home network prefixes are shown to host IP stack • Scenarios 4 - Only one home network prefix is shown to host IP stack

  3. Motivation (1/3) • Logical interface • used to hide the change of network interface from the upper host IP layer • Multihoming support of PMIPv6 • LMA MUST allocate a mobility session for each of the attached interfaces • The LMA MAY allocate more than one home network prefix for a given interface of the mobile node • The LMA MUST allow for a handoff between two different interfaces of a mobile node

  4. Motivation (2/3) • With logical interface, in LMA point of view; • LMAcan acknowledge each physical interface and it allocates mobility sessions for each interface and each mobility session for the each physical interface is generated ; sceanrio-1 • LMA can acknowledge only a logical interface and it allocates mobility sessions for a logical interface and mobility session for a logical interface is generated ; scenario-2

  5. Motivation (3/3) • With logical interface, in MN point of view • If a LMA allocates multiple HNPs to a multiple interfaces MN, these multiple home network prefixes are totally shown to the host IP stack ; scenario-3 • Even though a LMA allocates multiple HNPs to a multiple interfaces MN, only one home HNP is shown to the host IP stack ; scenario-4 • If a logical interface hides the change of interfaces and also can hide the change of home network prefixes

  6. Scenario-1 • LMA acknowledges each physical interface of a MN LMA MAG 2 MAG 1 P-CoA2 P-CoA1 RA (Prefix=HNP#1) RA (Prefix=HNP#2) WiMAX WLAN LL-ID : XXX LL-ID : YYY I/F 1 I/F 2 HNP#2 HNP#1 Logical Interface LL-ID : ZZZ Mobile Node

  7. Scenario-2 • LMA acknowledges a logical interface of a MN LMA MAG 2 MAG 1 P-CoA2 P-CoA1 RA (Prefix=HNP#1) RA (Prefix=HNP#2) WiMAX WLAN LL-ID : XXX LL-ID : YYY I/F 1 I/F 2 HNP#2 HNP#1 Logical Interface LL-ID : ZZZ Mobile Node

  8. Scenario-3 • All home network prefixes are shown to host IP stack LMA MAG 2 MAG 1 P-CoA2 P-CoA1 RA (Prefix=HNP#1) RA (Prefix=HNP#2) WiMAX WLAN LL-ID : XXX LL-ID : YYY I/F 1 I/F 2 HNP#2 HNP#1 Logical Interface LL-ID : ZZZ HNP#1::ZZZ/128, HNP#2::ZZZ/128 Mobile Node

  9. Scenario-4 • Only one home network prefix is shown to host IP stack LMA MAG 2 MAG 1 P-CoA2 P-CoA1 RA (Prefix=HNP#1) RA (Prefix=HNP#2) WiMAX WLAN LL-ID : XXX LL-ID : YYY I/F 1 I/F 2 HNP#2 HNP#1 Logical Interface LL-ID : ZZZ HNP#1::ZZZ/128 Mobile Node 9 9

  10. Next Step? • Is describing various scenario of the usage of logical interface in PMIPv6 necessary? • Or should we target on a specific scenario? • Scenario-1 vs. Scenario-2 • Scenario-3 vs. Scenario-4 • Is there interest in WG? • Then, develop as separate document or merge into Logical interface support document?

More Related