1 / 6

Run hwrf using WPS , GFS grib2 data, Prehybrid = NO HWRF F00 forecast vs GFS analysis

Run hwrf using WPS , GFS grib2 data, Prehybrid = NO HWRF F00 forecast vs GFS analysis. Run hwrf using WPS , GFS grib2 data, Prehybrid = NO + Wind speed difference close to 0 + U , V difference still large. Almost same as those using Prehybrid. Wind speed diff. U diff.

irina
Download Presentation

Run hwrf using WPS , GFS grib2 data, Prehybrid = NO HWRF F00 forecast vs GFS analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Run hwrf using WPS , GFS grib2 data, Prehybrid=NO HWRF F00forecast vs GFS analysis

  2. Run hwrf using WPS , GFS grib2 data, Prehybrid=NO + Wind speed difference close to 0 + U , V difference still large. Almost same as those using Prehybrid. Wind speed diff U diff V diff

  3. Streamlines from original GFS grib2 data file, and original HWRF grib F00 file. HWRF grib F00 GFS grib2 data Shaded is wind speed magnitude HWRF’s Left-bottom streamline is more north than GFS analysis

  4. HWRF 72-hr forecast vs GFS analysis

  5. Run hwrf using WPS , GFS grib2 data, Prehybrid=NO HWRF 72-hr forecast vs GFS analysis The spatial pattern of difference (U, V) is distributed more “randomly” than initial time. Wind speed diff U diff V diff

  6. HWRF grib F72 GFS analysis data HWRF’s Left-bottom streamline is still more north than GFS analysis, but better than initial time.

More Related