1 / 23

4 August 2008 - SPA508 Policy Analysis & Design-

4 August 2008 - SPA508 Policy Analysis & Design- . Major Instruments: Mandates, Inducements, Capacity Building, System Change Why usesd Costs & benefits Factors affecting costs Government capacity Fiscal resources Knowledge Lessons learned from interviews with policy analysts.

irisa
Download Presentation

4 August 2008 - SPA508 Policy Analysis & Design-

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 4 August 2008 - SPA508 Policy Analysis & Design- Major Instruments: Mandates, Inducements, Capacity Building, System Change Why usesd Costs & benefits Factors affecting costs Government capacity Fiscal resources Knowledge Lessons learned from interviews with policy analysts

  2. Where we have been • Defined a policy problem • Identified evidence to define the problem and suggest solutions • Identified values and trade offs (or conflicts) to guide design of a policy and its evaluation • Recognized political and budgetary factors that serve as opportunities or constraints • Developed outcomes and indicators to track implementation and determine success

  3. Instruments • From McDonnell & Elmore • Mandates • Incentives • Capacity Building • System Changing • From Bardach – • Taxes • Education & Consultation • Information

  4. Mandates or Rules • Expected effect: compliance – someone or somebody will do what is required • Wearing motorcycle helmets • Building accessible to disabled persons • Costs • Normally policy maker does not pay to get compliance (unfunded mandates), but • Pays cost of enforcement • Targets may pay to avoid (pay fines, lobbying, legal action)

  5. Mandates (Con’t) • Beneficiaries are • Specific individuals or groups (making buildings accessible benefits disabled persons) • Community as a whole – e.g., environmental regulations or food safety codes • Who benefits by requiring motorcycle helmets?

  6. Mandates (Cont’d) • Assume what is being mandated • Is something everyone affected should be able to do • Would not occur or would not occur often enough or consistently enough without a rule • Ex: speed limits, compulsory school attendance, food labeling • Amount spent on enforcement is directly related to compliance rate

  7. Inducements aka subsidies & grants • Transfer money to agencies or individuals to produce goods or services • A program (programs for children whose families are homeless) or • A physical project (build something), e.g., funds to build homeless shelters

  8. Inducements (Cont’d) • Oversight costs (assuring compliance) • Usually inducement have guidelines & conditions which specify important component, such as • Who is eligible • Indicators of quality, • Expected outcomes • Should have a mechanism to make sure recipients comply, reporting requirements, audits, inspections • May remove funding if conditions are met or related violations (In US universities can lose all federal funding if they do no protect human research subjects)

  9. Inducements (Cont’d) • Assumes • Things of value would not be produced or produced as frequently or consistently without additional money • Money is a way to get performance when what is needed can be produced with money (does not require added capacity) • Receiver oriented toward the future • An opportunity cost with a future benefit

  10. Inducements (Cont’d) • Differ from mandates • Use incentives, rather than coercion, to encourage performance • Production of value is an outcome (not compliance) • May be used to redistribute wealth • Need to monitor to make sure that wealth creation was appropriate (that the rich do not get richer) and that amount and quality of goods & services did not decrease

  11. Capacity Building • Transfer of money to individuals or agencies to obtain (invest in) future benefits, e.g. • Increasing skills of Penang’s labor force • Developing research capacity of universities • Returns may be uncertain, intangible, difficult to measure and distant • Costs borne by government & the public (investors) • Benefits in short run to agencies and individuals – in the long run to society

  12. Capacity Building & Other Tools • Mandates & inducements have tangible effects that are close at hand • Capacity building has distant & uncertain impact • Do you consider policies in some EU countries & S’pore to encourage families to have children inducements or capacity building? • How do investments in basic research illustrate the meaning of capacity building?

  13. System Changing • Transfer of official authority to expand or narrow who receives public money to provide services, e.g., • Allow private schools to receive public money • Allow non-gov’t organizations to deliver mail • Funding only shelters that provide mental health services • Changes service providers • May result in new agencies or organizations and/or • Some types of agencies may disappear • Done to • Increase efficiency • Increase a social welfare value • Assumes • Current situation/system is not working • A change in who does what will change what is produced or the efficiency of productions

  14. System Changing Strategies • Financing & contracting • Changing market (changing level of gov’t participation) • Modify framework of economic activity • Provide a new service – may also be considered as capacity building

  15. Other instruments (Bardach) • Taxes – most likely to raise gov’t revenue • Popular taxes: “sin” taxes & user fees • Education & consultation • Information – issues associated with disclosure

  16. Designing a Policy: Government Capacity as a Constraint • Governmental capacity • Does the gov’t have sufficient personnel with the needed skills and adequate time to implement the policy? • If the gov’t does not have sufficient personnel can the policy be implemented? How?

  17. Designing a Policy: Fiscal Capacity as a Constraint • Financial resources • Does the gov’t have sufficient financial resources to implement the policy? • If sufficient funds (slack resources) are not available policy makers will probably opt for the policy that costs less

  18. Designing a Policy: Information as a Constraint • Political intelligence – knowledge of stakeholders interests • Strategic response – ability to implement & ability to estimate response (effectiveness) • Analytical information – knowledge needed to demonstrate how the policy will work under different conditions

  19. McDonnell article: Reading along • On problem definitions, p 145 • On political opposition, p 148 • On past policy choices, p. 149

  20. Exercise • For assigned instrument (mandates, inducements, capacity building, or system changing) • Choose a policy and discuss • Why the instrument is appropriate/realistic • The expected costs & who would bear them • The expected benefits • Develop a short presentation (max 10 minutes) titled “Considerations in using [instrument] to design effective policies”

  21. Policy Analysts • For many bureaucrats focus on interpreting policies, making sure policies are applied correctly, responding to customer complaints • A few spoke of • Conducting surveys • Economic analysis • Strategic planning • Results-based management

  22. Interviews (Cont’d) • One noted value of knowledge could learn about better concepts, theories, hypotheses • One noted gov’t programs failed b/c of not establishing that there was adequate funding, time, & personnel • Nature of problem should justify resources used • Literature review keeps one from reinventing the wheel

  23. Next week • Download & review “Logic Model Workbook” pp. 5-22 • Think about how one could use a logic model to create a disaster training program for teachers & school children

More Related