150 likes | 299 Views
Summary of Cervical Cancer Prevention Options. Current optionsAbstinenceLifelong mutual monogamy Screening (followed by diagnosis and treatment)HPV DNA or Pap testingBoth HPV DNA and Pap testingFuture optionsScreening or triage by more accurate and less costly biomarkers (e.g., p16INK4a pr
E N D
1. HPV Vaccines: What We Know and What We Should Expect Laura Koutsky, PhD
Professor of Epidemiology
University of Washington
Seattle, WA
2. Summary of Cervical Cancer Prevention Options Current options
Abstinence
Lifelong mutual monogamy
Screening (followed by diagnosis and treatment)
HPV DNA or Pap testing
Both HPV DNA and Pap testing
Future options
Screening or triage by more accurate and less costly biomarkers (e.g., p16INK4a protein, DNA methylation markers)
Prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines
3. HPV L1 VLP Vaccine Synthesis
4. HPV L1 Virus-Like Particle (protein from the L1 gene of HPV)
5. Results from Two Randomized Clinical Trials of Young Women (~15 to 25 Years of Age) using HPV 16 or HPV 16 and 18 L1 VLP Vaccines Merck GSK
Vaccine Placebo VE (95% CI) Vaccine Placebo VE (95% CI)
768 765 401 397
Endpoint:
Persistent
HPV 16 0 41 100 (90,100)
HPV 16 or 18 0 10 100 (20,100)
HPV16-CIN 0 9
Merck Vaccine: HPV16 L1 VLP expressed in yeast (NEJM 2002;347:1645-51)
GSK Vaccine: HPV16 & 18 L1 VLP expressed in baculovirus system
(presented at EUROGIN Meeting in Paris April, 2003)
6. Results from Two Randomized Clinical Trials of HPV L1 VLP Vaccines (cont.) Both Merck and GSK trials showed:
High efficacy for preventing HPV infection
High levels of immunogenicity
>99% of vaccinees seroconverted
Antibody titers considerably higher than observed in natural infection
Generally safe and tolerable
8. The tolerability of the vaccine is presented in this slide.
The overall incidence of adverse experience was comparable among HPV 16 vaccine and placebo recipients.
The incidences of injection site AEs and systemic AEs were also similar between treatment groups.
There were few SAEs in the study. None was vaccine related.
In summary, the HPV 16 vaccine was generally well tolerated.
NEXT SLIDE PLEASEThe tolerability of the vaccine is presented in this slide.
The overall incidence of adverse experience was comparable among HPV 16 vaccine and placebo recipients.
The incidences of injection site AEs and systemic AEs were also similar between treatment groups.
There were few SAEs in the study. None was vaccine related.
In summary, the HPV 16 vaccine was generally well tolerated.
NEXT SLIDE PLEASE
9. Other HPV L1 VLP Vaccine Findings Cannot cause HPV infection
Vaccine only contains one protein from the virus (L1 protein)
HPV L1 protein is not a human carcinogen
HPV L1 VLPs appear to elicit both B cell and T cell responses
HPV antibody responses to L1 VLPs appear to be mostly type-specific
10. Detection of HPV Types in Cervix Cancers from Different Regions of the Worldfrom Clifford Br J Cancer 2003;88:63
11. Ongoing HPV L1 Vaccine Trials Phase II trial of Merck tetravalent HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 vaccine near completion
high antibody titers for each HPV type
International phase III trial of Merck tetravalent HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 vaccine has begun
Potential elimination of up to:
70% of invasive cervical cancers
60% of high grade cervical intraepithelial lesions
90% of genital warts and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis
GSK Phase III trial of bivalent HPV 16 and 18 vaccine to begin soon
12. HPV L1 VLP Vaccine Research Prevention of CIN2-3 and anogenital warts
Duration of protection
Gender differences in vaccine efficacy
Therapeutic potential of HPV VLP vaccines for post-infection protection
Increasing number of HPV types prevented
Potential for “replacement” lesions
Cost–effective approaches to screening and vaccinating
increase screening interval
improve accuracy of screening test
Reduction in incidence of cervical and other anogenital cancers, head and neck cancers and RRP
13. Future HPV Immunization Programs Implementation Issues Potential target populations
9 -12 years of age
Adolescents and young adults
Protection in men
Data on HPV vaccine efficacy in men not yet available
Only vaccinating women might be a good option in some communities
Societal acceptance of vaccines to prevent sexually transmitted infections
Awareness of HPV consequences and ubiquity
Anti-cancer vaccine
14. Potential Impact of HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 Vaccine on STD Control Reduce number of genital wart visits
Later or less frequent detection of other STDs
Reduce number of women requiring referral to colposcopy, biopsy and treatment
Increase demand for information on HPV and HPV vaccines
Vaccine is prophylactic not therapeutic
Vaccine does not prevent all HPVs or other STDs/HIV
Pap screening still important
15. Take Home Messages A prophylactic vaccine to prevent HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 infections and related-neoplasms is likely to be available within 4 to 6 years
The promise of such a vaccine will be realized only if immunization programs achieve wide coverage
2nd generation vaccines that prevent infection by additional oncogenic HPV types are under development
Screening to detect and treat lesions in women who were infected prior to vaccination or infected with HPV types not covered by the vaccine will continue
More accurate and less costly screening tests are being developed
Public health experts must begin thinking about the use of prophylactic HPV vaccines in their communities
16. Collaborators University of Washington
Akhila Balasubramanian
Qinghua Feng
Tiffany Harris (Albert Einstein)
King Holmes
James Hughes
Jane Kuypers
Nancy Kiviat
Shu-Kuang Lee
Connie Mao
Leslie Miller
Bethany Weaver
Noel Weiss
Rachel Winer
Long Fu Xi
Duke University
Shalini Kulasingam
Evan Myers
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Denise Galloway
Jody Carter
Merck Research Laboratories
Eliav Barr
Kathrin Jansen
University of New Mexico
Cosette Wheeler