1 / 10

Workgroup # 96 Developing An Interface To The AFSM 100 Automatic Induction Process

Workgroup # 96 Developing An Interface To The AFSM 100 Automatic Induction Process. INDUSTRY CO-CHAIR MIKE WINN. POSTAL CO-CHAIR DAVE WILLIAMS. WORKGROUP OBJECTIVES. Develop Innovative Preparation Techniques To Facilitate Transition To New Induction Device Create A Roadmap For The Future

Download Presentation

Workgroup # 96 Developing An Interface To The AFSM 100 Automatic Induction Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Workgroup # 96 Developing An Interface To The AFSM 100 Automatic Induction Process INDUSTRY CO-CHAIR MIKE WINN POSTAL CO-CHAIR DAVE WILLIAMS

  2. WORKGROUP OBJECTIVES • Develop Innovative Preparation Techniques To Facilitate Transition To New Induction Device • Create A Roadmap For The Future • Identify Problems • Offer Solutions • Consider Linkage to Flats Sequencing System (FSS) • Minimize Costs In The End-to-end Process

  3. OVERVIEW

  4. AUTO INDUCTION STATUS • Ai Deployment Schedule • Purchased 206 ai Systems for 59 Sites • Deployment: October 29, 2005 – September 30, 2006 • Install 6 Systems Per Week Starting February 25 • Ai is Operating Within the Following Postal Plants: • Southern Maryland MD St. Louis MO • Pittsburgh PA Birmingham AL • Richmond VA Jacksonville FL • Buffalo NY North Metro GA • Dayton OH Los Angeles CA

  5. MTAC Meeting - February 22, 2006 Bundle Cost Analysis Examined 3 Alternatives to Counter Stacked Bundles • Uncompensated Bundles with Fewer Pieces • Flats Presented Loose in Flat Trays • Flats Presented Loose in Automation Compatible Trays (ACT) Conclusions • Alternatives Provided Insignificant Savings • Need to Align Preparation with Machine Needs

  6. AUTOMATION COMPATIBLE TRAY (ACT) AUTOMATION COMPATIBLE TRAY

  7. Dolly Docks A “Dolly” is a Low Platform on Casters to Move Loads Northrup Grumman Prototype • One Dolly Supports 3 Tiers of 4 ACT (12 ACT Per Dolly) • Clearance Under Dock for Forklift Tines • Top Cap Enables Stacking and Nesting of Dollies • Dolly Conveyor Removes Column of 3 ACTs at AFSM-ai

  8. Dolly Dock Test • Purpose – Identify Container and Mail Flow Issues From Mailer to Postal Service • Plan • Harte Hanks Fills 12 ACT and Loads 10 Dollies (12,000 flat pieces) • Harte Hanks Transports Dollies from Wilkes Barre PA to Southern Maryland for Induction into AFSM 100 • Test Period – 4 Weeks Beginning May 10, 2006

  9. Next Steps • Telecon – March 24, 2006 – 9:00 EST Review Savings from Eliminating Postal Flat Prep and Bypassing APPS • Next MTAC Meeting – May 17, 2006 – 8:00 to10:00 • Field Trip to Southern MD– May 18, 2006 afternoon Observe Induction of ACTs from Dolly Docks

  10. QUESTIONS ?

More Related