1 / 34

CS 430 / INFO 430: Information Retrieval

CS 430 / INFO 430: Information Retrieval. Lecture 16 Web Search 2. CS 430 / INFO 430: Information Retrieval. Completion of Lecture 16. Mercator/Heritrix: Domain Name Lookup. Resolving domain names to IP addresses is a major bottleneck of web crawlers. Approach:

isabelle-rowen
Download Presentation

CS 430 / INFO 430: Information Retrieval

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CS 430 / INFO 430: Information Retrieval Lecture 16 Web Search 2

  2. CS 430 / INFO 430: Information Retrieval Completion of Lecture 16

  3. Mercator/Heritrix: Domain Name Lookup Resolving domain names to IP addresses is a major bottleneck of web crawlers. Approach: • Separate DNS resolver and cache on each crawling computer. • Create multi-threaded version of DNS code (BIND). In Mercator, these changes reduced DNS loop-up from 70% to 14% of each thread's elapsed time.

  4. Research Topics in Web Crawling • How frequently to crawl and what strategies to use. • Identification of anomalies and crawling traps. • Strategies for crawling based on the content of web pages (focused and selective crawling). • Duplicate detection.

  5. Further Reading Heritrix http://crawler.archive.org/ Allan Heydon and Marc Najork, Mercator: A Scalable, Extensible Web Crawler. World Wide Web 2(4):219-229, December 1999. http://research.microsoft.com/~najork/mercator.pdf

  6. CS 430 / INFO 430: Information Retrieval Lecture 16 Web Search 2

  7. Course Administration

  8. Indexing the Web Goals: Precision Short queries applied to very large numbers of items leads to large numbers of hits. • Goal is that the first 10-100 hits presented should satisfy the user's information need -- requires ranking hits in order that fits user's requirements • Recall is not an important criterion Completeness of index is not an important factor. • Comprehensive crawling is unnecessary

  9. Graphical Methods Document A provides information about document B Document A refers to document B

  10. Anchor Text The source of Document A contains the marked-up text: <a href="http://www.cis.cornell.edu/">The Faculty of Computing and Information Science</a> The anchor text: The Faculty of Computing and Information Science can be considered descriptive metadata about the document: http://www.cis.cornell.edu/

  11. Concept of Relevance and Importance Document measures Relevance, as conventionally defined, is binary (relevant or not relevant). It is usually estimated by the similarity between the terms in the query and each document. Importancemeasures documents by their likelihood of being useful to a variety of users. It is usually estimated by some measure of popularity. Web search engines rank documents by a combination of estimates of relevance and importance.

  12. Ranking Options 1. Paid advertisers 2. Manually created classification 3. Vector space ranking with corrections for document length, and extra weighting for specific fields, e.g., title, anchors, etc. 4. Popularity, e.g., PageRank The details of 3 and the balance between 3 and 4 are not made public.

  13. Citation Graph cites Paper is cited by Note that journal citations always refer to earlier work.

  14. Bibliometrics Techniques that use citation analysis to measure the similarity of journal articles or their importance Bibliographic coupling: two papers that cite many of the same papers Co-citation: two papers that were cited by many of the same papers Impact factor (of a journal): frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year or period

  15. Bibliometrics: Impact Factor Impact Factor (Garfield, 1972) • Set of journals in Journal Citation Reports of the Institute for Scientific Information • Impact factor of a journal j in a given year is the average number of citations received by papers published in the previous two years of journal j. Impact factor counts in-degrees of nodes in the network. Influence Weight (Pinski and Narin, 1976) • A journal is influential if, recursively, it is heavily cited by other influential journals.

  16. Graphical Analysis of Hyperlinks on the Web This page links to many other pages (hub) 2 1 4 Many pages link to this page (authority) 3 6 5

  17. Graphical Methods on Web Links Choices • Graph of full Web or subgraph • In-links to a node or all links Algorithms • Hubs and Authorities -- subgraph, all links (Kleinberg, 1997) • PageRank -- full graph, in-links only (Brin and Page, 1998)

  18. PageRank Algorithm Used to estimate popularity of documents Concept: The rank of a web page is higher if many pages link to it. Links from highly ranked pages are given greater weight than links from less highly ranked pages. PageRank is essentially a modified version of Pinski and Narin's influence weights applied to the Web graph.

  19. Intuitive Model (Basic Concept) Basic (no damping) A user: 1. Starts at a random page on the web 2. Selects a random hyperlink from the current page and jumps to the corresponding page Repeats Step 2 a very large number of times Pages are ranked according to the relative frequency with which they are visited.

  20. Basic Algorithm: Matrix Representation Citing page (from) P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 Number P1 1 1 P2 1 1 2 P3 1 1 1 3 P4 1 1 1 1 4 P5 1 1 P6 1 1 Cited page (to) Number 4 2 1 1 3 1

  21. Basic Algorithm: Normalize by Number of Links from Page Citing page P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P1 0.33 P2 0.25 1 P3 0.25 0.5 1 P40.25 0.5 0.33 1 P50.25 P6 0.33 = B Cited page Normalized link matrix Number 4 2 1 1 3 1

  22. Basic Algorithm: Weighting of Pages Initially all pages have weight 1/n w0 = Recalculate weights w1 = Bw0 = 0.06 0.21 0.29 0.35 0.04 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 If the user starts at a random page, the jth element of w1 is the probability of reaching page j after one step.

  23. Basic Algorithm: Iterate Iterate: wk = Bwk-1 w0 w1 w2 w3 ... converges to ...w -> -> -> -> -> -> 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.32 0.46 0.19 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.47 0.34 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.06 0.21 0.29 0.35 0.04 0.06 At each iteration, the sum of the weights is 1.

  24. Special Cases of Hyperlinks on the Web There is no link out of {2, 3, 4} 2 1 4 3 6 5

  25. Special Cases of Hyperlinks on the Web 2 1 4 3 6 5 Node 6 is a dangling node, with no outlink. Possible solution: set each element of column 6 of B to 1/n, but this ruins the sparsity of matrix B.

  26. Google PageRank with Damping A user: 1. Starts at a random page on the web 2a. With probability 1-d, selects any random page and jumps to it 2b. With probability d, selects a random hyperlink from the current page and jumps to the corresponding page 3. Repeats Step 2a and 2b a very large number of times Pages are ranked according to the relative frequency with which they are visited. [For dangling nodes, always follow 2a.]

  27. The PageRank Iteration The basic method iterates using the normalized link matrix, B. wk = Bwk-1 This w is an eigenvector of B PageRank iterates using a damping factor. The method iterates: wk = (1 - d)w0 + dBwk-1 w0 is a vector with every element equal to 1/n.

  28. The PageRank Iteration The iteration expression with damping can be re-written. Let R be a matrix with every element equal to 1/n Rwk-1= w0 (The sum of the elements of wk-1 equals 1) Let G = dB + (1-d)R (G is called the Google matrix) The iteration formula wk = (1-d)w0 + dBwk-1 is equivalent to wk = Gwk-1 so that w is an eigenvector of G

  29. Iterate with Damping Iterate: wk = Gwk-1 (d = 0.7) w0 w1 w2 w3 ... converges to ...w -> -> -> -> -> -> 0.06 0.28 0.31 0.22 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.24 0.34 0.22 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.21 0.06 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.09 0.20 0.26 0.30 0.08 0.09

  30. Convergence of the Iteration The following results can be proved for the Google matrix, G. (See for example, Langville and Meyer.) • The iteration always converges • The largest eignenvalue 1 = 1 • The value of 2 the second largest eigenvalue, depends on d. • As d approaches 1, 2 also approaches 1 • The rate of convergence depends on (2\1)k, where k is the number of iterations

  31. Computational Efficiency B is a very sparse matrix. Let average number of outlinks per page = p. Each iteration of wk = Bwk-1 requires O(np) = O(n) multiplications. G is a dense matrix. Each iteration of wk = Gwk-1 requires O(n2) multiplications. But each iteration of wk = (1-d)w0 + dBwk-1 requires O(n) multiplications. Therefore this is the form used in practical computations.

  32. Choice of d Conceptually, values of d that are close to 1 are desirable as they emphasize the link structure of the Web graph, but... • The rate of convergence of the iteration decreases as d approaches 1. • The sensitivity of PageRank to small variations in data increases as d approaches 1. It is reported that Google uses a value of d = 0.85 and that the computation converges in about 50 iterations

  33. Suggested Reading See: Jon Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46, 1999, for descriptions of all these methods Book: Amy Langville and Carl Meyer, Google's PageRank and Beyond: the Science of Search Engine Rankings. Princeton University Press, 2006. Or take: CS/Info 685,The Structure of Information Networks

More Related