170 likes | 283 Views
Monitoring the 2002 Code of Practice for Commercial Leases Research Team Neil Crosby, Sandi Murdoch, Cathy Hughes The University of Reading (http://www.rdg.ac.uk/crer/leasefinal.pdf). Government interest. Property recession of 1989/90 long leases and upward only rent reviews
E N D
Monitoring the 2002 Code of Practice for Commercial Leases Research Team Neil Crosby, Sandi Murdoch, Cathy Hughes The University of Reading (http://www.rdg.ac.uk/crer/leasefinal.pdf)
Government interest • Property recession of 1989/90 long leases and upward only rent reviews • Complaints, Report and Consultation • 1st Code of practice Market changes but ineffectual code • 2nd Code of practice
What did Government want new Code to achieve? • Flexibility • Choice • Awareness
Reading University monitoring 2002 to 2004 • Analysis of IPD and VOA lease data • Interview survey of lawyers and agents • Questionnaire survey of lenders, property agents, solicitors, landlords and tenants • 11 case studies of lease negotiations
Flexibility Positive • Reducing lease lengths • More and earlier breaks • Easier operation of breaks • More schedules of condition
IPD All Property Average lease length 1997 - 2003 Continuing downward trend
VOA All Property Average lease length 1998 to 2003 Renewed downward trend
VOA Frequency of Lease Lengths - 2003 Note incidence of 15 yrs retail and 10 yrs office and industrial
Breaks • Variation in incidence • Local authority landlords have a different view on prevalence of breaks • Pre-conditions on operation rare
Flexibility Negative • Assignment and subletting still subject to conditions • Rent reviews still upward only
Rent reviews • Most are to market rent and on 3 or 5 year patterns • Almost all are upwards only • But 50% of 2003 leases in IPD have no reviews at all • Breaks often timed at review – but not escape route
Choice • No menus, little explicit pricing, few technical aids applied • Choice has to be sought by tenants rather than offered by landlords • Negotiation of terms - lease length, repairs and breaks most commonly negotiated issues
Choice – rent review type • Virtually no offers of alternatives made by landlords • Virtually no seeking of up/down by tenants or their agents • Review type bottom of ranking of negotiated major lease issues.
Small business tenants • More likely to occupy at lower rents and shorter leases • Less likely to take professional advice, especially commercial agents • Less likely to have had a business lease before • More likely to take lease on first terms offered • Less likely to know what is in the lease • Less able to negotiate best terms available
Impact of the Code of Practice • More awareness of its existence • LA landlords less aware of contents and less likely to inform tenants • Virtually no direct impact on specific negotiations • But played an important part in application of pressure for change in leasing practices
Conclusions – half full or half empty • Increased flexibility – lease length, breaks, repairs • No increased flexibility – review type and alienation • But fewer leases with rent reviews • Tenants not prepared to pay for up/down • Lease pricing “intuitive” not technical
Government decisions • Government Consultation - Deterring upwards only rent review clauses. 6 options offered • Decision not to legislate but keeping options open • Accepted our conclusion that assignment and subletting a major issue and have undertaken to review the law • Also accept our conclusion that SBTs an issue • Review of Code over the next 3 years