1 / 6

Hans van der Veer

SPAN and TIPHON : Together? Conclusions from a brainstorming session between the (majority) of the SPAN management team and the chairman of TIPHON. Hans van der Veer. NGN-SG Recommendations. ETSI should take a leading role in pushing for global consolidation of NGN Standardisation

ishmael-burks
Download Presentation

Hans van der Veer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SPAN and TIPHON : Together?Conclusions from a brainstorming session between the (majority) of the SPAN management team and the chairman of TIPHON Hans van der Veer

  2. NGN-SG Recommendations • ETSI should take a leading role in pushing for global consolidation of NGN Standardisation • ETSI should make a set of targeted NGN related standardisation initiatives covering the fields of • architectures and protocols • end-to-end QoS • service platforms • network management • lawful interception and security Initial Conclusion: • Since these technical fields all relate to the ToR of TC SPAN and as well as to the ToR of EP TIPHON, it seems appropriate to investigate a possible “going together” of these ETSI TBs

  3. Current WG Organisation Possible New Organisation • Maintenance • E. 164 • (B-)ISDN Service Descriptions • INAP • DSS1 • DSS2 • SS7 (e.g. ISUP) • SPAN 11: • Numbering & Addressing • Routing • Service Descriptions/Req. • WG - Requirements and Architectures • Service requirements • Architectures (IPCableCom) • IP Federated Networks • SPAR • OSA/Parlay (3GPP) • SPAN 12: • OSA/Parlay (3GPP) & Testing • H.248 (IPCableCom) • BICC • INAP Conformance Testing • WG - Protocols • H.248 (IPCableCom) • BICC • SIGTRAN & SIP (IPCAbleCom) • DTM • SPAN 13: • DTM • SIGTRAN • SIP (IPCableCom) • Conformance Testing (e.g. DSS1) • WG - Numbering, Naming & Addressing • Numbering & Addressing & Routing • WG - Testing • Conformance Testing for e.g. INAP, DSS1, SS7 • SPAN 14: • Architectures (IPCableCom) • IP Federated Networks • SPAR • WG - Maintenance • e.g. E.164, (B)ISDN Serv. Descr., INAP, DSS1, DSS2, SS7 ISUP Review of TC SPAN activities

  4. Current Organisation Possible New Organisation • TIPHON 01 • Service Req. (e.g. Firewall), Service Capabilities • Network & Service Management requirements • WG - Requirements and Architectures • Service Req. (e.g. Firewall), Service Capabilities • Mobility Aspects • Network & Service Management Req. • Architecture, Ref.Points, Information Flows • TIPHON 02 • Architecture, Ref.Points, Information Flows • TIPHON 03 • Protocol framework & meta-protocol • Protocol mapping & NM & SM MIBs + protocols • WG - Protocols • Protocol framework & meta-protocol • Protocol mapping (e.g. H.248, BICC, SIP) • NM & SM MIBs + protocols • TIPHON 04 • Numbering & Addressing, Routing • WG - Numbering, Naming & Addressing • Numbering & Addressing, Routing • TIPHON 05 • End to End Quality of Service • WG - Quality of Service • End to End Quality of Service • TIPHON 06 • Conformance Testing & Verification • WG - Security • Security: e.g. Threat analysis, Lawful Intercept • TIPHON 07 (Dormant) • Mobility aspects • WG - Testing • Conformance Testing for “mapped protocols” (e.g. H.323, SIP, H.248, BICC) • TIPHON 08 • Security: e.g. Threat analysis, Lawful Intercept Review of EP TIPHON Activities

  5. Possible New SPAN Organisation Possible New TIPHON Organisation • WG - Requirements and Architectures • Service requirements • Architectures (e.g. IPCableCom) • IP Federated Networks • SPAR • OSA/Parlay (3GPP) • WG - Requirements and Architectures • Service Req. (e.g. Firewall), Service Capabilities • Mobility Aspects • Network & Service Management Req. • Architecture, Ref.Points, Information Flows • WG - Protocols • Protocol framework & meta-protocol • Protocol mapping (e.g. H.248, BICC, SIP) • NM & SM MIBs + protocols • WG - Protocols • H.248 (IPCableCom) • BICC • SIGTRAN & SIP (IPCAbleCom) • DTM • WG - Numbering, Naming & Addressing • Numbering & Addressing, Routing • WG - Numbering, Naming & Addressing • Numbering & Addressing & Routing • WG - Quality of Service • End to End Quality of Service • WG - Testing • Conformance Testing for e.g. INAP, DSS1, SS7 • WG - Security • Security: e.g. Threat analysis, Lawful Intercept • WG - Maintenance • e.g. E.164, (B)ISDN Serv. Descr., INAP, DSS1, DSS2, SS7 ISUP • WG - Testing • Conformance Testing for “mapped protocols” (e.g. H.323, SIP, H.248, BICC) Synergy by Combining?

  6. A Combined TB “NGN”? • Possible Organization, covering all current SPAN & TIPHON work: • WG01: Requirements & Architecture • to be split into several sub-WGs (e.g. OSA/Parlay) • WG02: Protocols • WG03: Numbering, Naming & Addressing • WG04: Quality of Service • WG05: Security • WG06: Testing • WG07: Maintenance (of published NA/SPS/SPAN ENs) • Conclusion:A going together of SPAN and TIPHON offers a lot of advantages (e.g. allows future integration with other TBs)!

More Related