390 likes | 529 Views
Planners Forum Melbourne 2011. Nicole Cameron. Current Situation. Department of Health New CE formation of Department of Families Health Reform – opportunity for change Structural changes underway – staged approach Only at the beginning (11 April 2011) Service Planning
E N D
Planners ForumMelbourne 2011 Nicole Cameron
Current Situation • Department of Health • New CE • formation of Department of Families • Health Reform – opportunity for change • Structural changes underway – staged approach • Only at the beginning (11 April 2011) • Service Planning • Historically more of a ‘silo’ approach • Need for integrated planning (continuum/ clinical/ infrastructure) • Likely an official Departmental Planning Unit will be established • Meanwhile work is underway…
Northern Territory – it IS special! • Population Context • Large geographical mass sparsely populated • Small resident population with historically younger profile • 30% Indigenous people (2.4% Nationally) • 70% Indigenous people live in remote/ very remote areas • Greater proportion of Low SEIFA values than any other jurisdiction • Population Health (BOD) • Lower life expectancy than any other jurisdiction • Highest BOD amongst all jurisdictions • NT indigenous BOD 3.57 times higher than national average • NT non-indigenous BOD 1.22 times greater • Activity • Small proportion of population account for high usage of services • ASH - Over 66% inpatient Indigenous & over 80% ED presentations
From today… • Political Context • Close political environment • Territory 2030 – strategic direction for major services • Health services will be easier to access for all • Access to services will be at a similar level as other states • New Hospital in Darwin • Multiple stakeholders (AMSANT/ GPNNT/ Remote) • Have commenced integrated planning (noting last point) • Challenge for the NT: • ‘Purist’ influence - service planning technical tools • Pragmatic approach – in the NT context • Creative implementation – multiple challenges (often conflicting) but necessary to think differently and apply national and international learnings to meet these ‘special’ needs
Creativity in implementation An example for today: Renal Services in the NT
The Problem • High Chronic Disease and increasing ESKD • Majority from remote community (85% all dialysis patient are Indigenous people) • Centralised service provision • Poor access to health services • Limited access to specialists • Poor management of CKD • Prior to CTG/ intervention • Poor psychosocial preparation for treatment • We needed to think creatively in the context of the Territory, the patient and also of best practice
Focus of NT Renal Services • New Strategy and Service Plan Development • Coordination with Remote Health DCI, AMSANTS, AG and NGO • Improved Care Coordination - identification and case management • Public Health RN and IT integration • Case Conferencing and Outreach CKD clinics • Resources • All options available (palliative care/ renal project) • Decentralise and decrease demand for satellite services • Supported PD – hostel accommodation (Mid 2011) • Home and community based HD (self care – relocatables/ RRR) • Smaller regional facilities • Finding viable solutions • Supporting people to be independent in their care • Opportunities for treatment closer to home (reverse respite/ renal bus)
Building in Program Flexibility Infrastructure • Client’s home • Renal Ready Rooms • Aged Care Centres • Relocatables Simple systems • Safely contained • Easily maintained by client • Minimal need for intervention (promote independence) #3x3 area #1 chair up to 4 people #Capacity for 1 or 2 chairs
Training Program Training Agreement • Client responsible for treatment • Client agrees to attend all training sessions • Client trains partner • Competency Checklists Interpreters Community Consultation (up to 3 visits) • Community Health Centre Staff • Local Shire Staff and store managers if required Community Partnership Agreements Client and Staff Support • Hot Line • Regular site visits
Community-based Home HD Services TIWI ISLANDS Home Training Unit Darwin and Alice Springs – 2 stations WDNWPT Reverse respite - 2 stations –A/Springs, Yuendemu, Ntaria and Kintore GROOTE EYLANDT Home situation – Darwin x 3 Wadeye x 1 station Renal Ready Room – 1 station Nguiu, Ramingining, Yirrkala, Kalkarindji, Mt Liebig, Santa Teresa Renal Ready Room – 2 station, Gove Relocatable - 2 station, Galiwinku, Maningrida, Milingimbi, Angurugu, Borroloola, Amoonguna, Ti Tree, Ali Curung ,Oenpelli, Ngukurr, Barunga, Lake Nash Proposed new sites – Milingimbi, Wadeye, Maningrida,
Peritoneal Dialysis Patients TIWI ISLANDS GROOTE EYLANDT CAPD APD Patients in TE = 28 Urban and rural Darwin, Katherine, Jabiru, Timber Creek, Kalkarindji, Pigeon Hole, Palumpa, Jilkminggan, Beswick, Ngukurr, Gapuwiyak, Gove, Yirrkala, Milingimbi and Maningrida Patients in CA =10 Alice Springs x 6, Tennant Creek x 2, Kiwirrkurra x 1, Santa Teresa x 1
Waste Management in Remote Areas • Remote community waste directed to land fill • Each HHD patient generates 1 bin every 4-6 weeks. • Removal of biohazard waste • Tracking and management resource intense • Biohazard waste management legislation • Need a new management strategy
Turbo Burner Requirements • 200L drum in reasonable condition to ensure a snug fit of the turbo burner lid. • Weatherproof storage facility due to electrical components • Wood/cardboard/old oil or substitute combustible to achieve the best burn • Requires the management (loading, lighting, storing) to be allocated
Outcomes • Complete burn of medical waste with minimal accelerants (waste oil or diesel) • Produced a smoke free and odourless burn • No hazardous gas emissions • A preferable option of disposing of dialysate waste to landfill • A more cost effective option than removing waste from communities
Turbo burner Locations TIWI ISLANDS Yuendumu, Ntaria Kintore , Mt Leibig GROOTE EYLANDT Nguiu, Wadeye Santa Teresa Galiwinku, Maningrida, Milingimbi, Angurugu, Borroloola, Amoonguna, Ali Curung , Ngukurr, Barunga, Lake Nash
Western Desert NganampaWalytjaPalyantjakuTjutaku (WNDWPT) • Reverse Respite Program – non-gov service delivery model • Supported through funding from sales of art and mining royalties • Supported by a board of elders from the Kintore region and a separate board from Yuendumu (providing own funds, under the guidance of WDNWPT) • Alice Springs location at the Purple house providing Social support, advocacy, PHC services, self care training and respite dialysis • Nurse assisted dialysis and Return to Country trips provided: • Kintore • Yuendumu • Hermannsburg • Nurses employed under a private contract arrangement
Requirements for Community Dialysis NT Renal Services has a SLA with WDNWPT to support with machines and chairs to provide reverse respite. WDNWPT ensure clients: • have clearance from the Nephrologist to be dialysed away from the Renal unit • trip is planned (ie you can’t turn up at your community dialysis facility and expect to be dialysed) • have family support for your visit • have been going regularly to dialysis, taking meds to be considered for a trip home • Who miss scheduled dialysis out bush are returned to town • WDNWPT is responsible for the dialysis care of the patient.
Mobile Bus Feasibility - Service Gap • Limited rural satellite units and limited placements • Tiwi Dialysis Centre – fly in fly out basis, difficult to expand • Katherine Dialysis Unit – most from surrounding regions, issues of relocation • Tennant Creek Dialysis Unit – at capacity • Self-care Therapies • Home HD - growing but long training periods, self-reliance important, infrastructure rollout slow and costly • Peritoneal Dialysis – uptake improving but ‘churn’ high • Resistance from community relating to poor perceptions of RRT • Disincentive of staffed facilities • Patient Personal Capacity • Many patients will never attain self-care status • Reliance on ‘partners’ – spectacularly unsuccessful
Opportunity for Improvement • Psychosocial • maintenance of relationships with kin and country, • Enable important events to be attended safely – community business, funerals, festivals • Improved morbidity and mortality • Reduce acute care costs • medical evacuation events, decrease hospitalisations • Increase opportunities for education around renal disease • Opportunity to change community perceptions • Increase opportunities to attract and retain staff
Pros and Cons of Mobile Service • Benefits • Can provide respite dialysis to a broad range of communities • Infrastructure and recurrent costs are lower • Can be utilised to provide education and undertake clinics • Is self-contained with minimal impact on community • Only requires access to water • High interest in service implementation (recruitment) • Risks • Robustness of dialysis machinery over un-graded roads untested • Continuous access to water maybe an issue • Will need time to work out teething problems • Space configuration for dialysis, sleeping and living yet to be tested