290 likes | 403 Views
Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics. December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014. Total Enrollment. Office of Institutional Research, January 13, 2014. Enrollment – New Entering Freshmen. UO Office of Enrollment Management, January 13, 2014. Enrollment – New Entering Transfers.
E N D
Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014
Total Enrollment Office of Institutional Research, January 13, 2014
Enrollment – New Entering Freshmen UO Office of Enrollment Management, January 13, 2014
Enrollment – New Entering Transfers UO Office of Enrollment Management, January 13, 2014
Average High School GPAEntering Freshmen UO Office of Enrollment Management, October 25, 2013
New Entering FreshmenBy Residency Status International Domestic Nonresident Resident UO Office of Enrollment Management, January 13, 2014
Admitted UndergraduatesBy Residency Status International Domestic Nonresident Resident Office of Institutional Research, January 13, 2014
Growth in Student Credit Hours2006-07 to 2012-13 Office of Institutional Research, December 23, 2013
Ratio of tenure-related faculty to non-tenured Office of Institutional Research, January 9, 2014
Student / Instructional Faculty Ratio Office of Institutional Research, December 9, 2013
Growth in Staff: Faculty, Classified and Unclassified Office of Institutional Research, December 9, 2013
Square Feet of Classroom Space per Student FTE Office of Institutional Research, January 8, 2014
Square Feet of Office Space per Faculty FTE Office of Institutional Research, January 8, 2014
Undergraduate Class Size: SCH Earned in Courseswith Enrollment of <25 and >60 Office of Institutional Research, December 9, 2013
Graduate Student Credit Hours by Course Number Office of Institutional Research, December 9, 2013
UNIVERSITY OF OREGONNRC Ranking of Research Doctorate Programs2010
AAU Comparison Metrics Examples: • Student selectivity measures • Student success measures • Research expenditures • Faculty productivity measures • Student-Faculty Ratios • Numbers of highly ranked programs • Total expenditures per student FTE • Philanthropy
25th percentile and 75th percentile SAT scores for incoming freshman We see that the middle band of UO SAT scores, generally between about 985 and 1224, lags our AAU peers. Moreover, we are slowly falling behind.
4-year and 6-year graduation rates.
Research Expenditures per Faculty Member In absolute dollars, UO spends less on research than any other AAU public. But in terms of dollars per faculty UO looks much better and is making important strides forward. AAU Percentiles for research expenditures per faculty = Oregon
Faculty Research Impact Books: UO faculty, on the average, produce more scholarly books than their average AAU peers. Citations: UO average number of citations per faculty lags the AAU average. Honors and Awards – UO faculty, on the average, receive their fare share of honors and awards Source: Academic Analytics, 2010
Student – Tenure Line Faculty ratios UO faculty are serving 50% more students than their peers at AAU public institutions. Bachelor Degrees awarded per Tenure Line Faculty On the average, UO faculty are producing far more bachelors degrees than their peers at public AAU institutions.
Ph.D. Production Number of PhD’s granted per tenure related faculty (x 1000) Source: IPEDS
Numbers of high-rank PhD programs. As of 2012, UO has 9 Ph.D. programs in the top 20% of all similar Ph.D. programs in high research universities, as determined by faculty research productivity: Source: Academic Analytics
Total Expenditures per Student The UO spends less per student than any of the other 33 public AAU Universities, well less than half of the average, and we are falling behind.
Total Expenditures per Student With 25,000 student FTE, the UO would need to spend an additional $44,500,000 to move to 31st place on this list.
Annual Giving In most years, gifts to UO are close to half the average of our AAU peers. But annual giving should be understood relative to the size of the institution – for example in terms of financial size. Considering annual giving as a percentage of total annual expendituresUO looks much better. Annual giving normalized by total annual expenditures Source: Council for Aid to Education, Voluntary Support of Education Survey
Data Sources • IPEDS – Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System • AAUDE – Association of American Universities Data Exchange • Academic Analytics – a benchmarking platform • Council for Aid to Education • Delaware Study of Costs and Productivity