170 likes | 492 Views
Chapter Two. Strategy, Organization Design and Effectiveness. Top Management Role in Organization Direction, Design, and Effectiveness. External Environment. Organization Design. Opportunities Threats Uncertainty Resource Availability. Structural Form – learning vs.
E N D
Chapter Two Strategy, Organization Design and Effectiveness
Top Management Role in Organization Direction, Design, and Effectiveness External Environment Organization Design Opportunities Threats Uncertainty Resource Availability Structural Form – learning vs. efficiency Information and control systems Production technology Human resource policies, incentives Organizational culture Interorganizational linkages Effectiveness Outcomes Strategic Direction Resources Efficiency Goal attainment Competing values Define mission, official goals Select operational goals, competitive strategies CEO, Top Management Team Internal Situation Strengths Weaknesses Distinctive Competence Leadership Style Past Performance Source: Adapted from Arie Y. Lewin and Carroll U. Stephens, “Individual Properties of the CEO as Determinants of Organization Design,” unpublished manuscript, Duke University, 1990; and Arie Y. Lewin and Carroll U. Stephens, “CEO Attributes as Determinants of Organization Design: An integrated Model,” Organization Studies 15, no. 2 (1994): 183-212
Organizational Purpose • Mission • Operative Goals • Overall Performance • Resources • Market • Employee Development • Innovation and Change • Productivity • The Importance of Goals
Goal Type and Purpose Type of Goals Purpose of Goals Official Goals, mission: Legitimacy Operative goals: Employee direction and motivation Decision guidelines Standard of performance
Miles and Snow’sStrategy Typology • Prospector • Learning orientation; flexible, fluid, decentralized structure • Strong capability in research • Values creativity, risk-taking, and innovation • Defender • Efficiency orientation; centralized authority and tight cost control • Emphasis on production efficiency, low overhead • Close supervision; little employee empowerment Source: Based on Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema, “How Market Leaders Keep Their Edge,” Fortune February 6, 1995, 88-98; Michael Hitt, R. Duane Ireland, and Robert E. Hoskisson, Strategic Management (St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1995), 100-113; and Raymond E. Miles, Charles c. Snow, Alan D. Meyer, and Henry L. Coleman, Jr., “Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process,” Academy of Management Review 3 (1978), 546-562
Miles and Snow’sStrategy Typology (cont’d) • Analyzer • Balances efficiency and learning; tight cost control with flexibility and adaptability • Efficient production for stable product lines; emphasis on creativity, research, risk-taking for innovation • Reactor • No clear organizational approach; design characteristics may shift abruptly depending on current needs Source: Based on Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema, “How Market Leaders Keep Their Edge,” Fortune February 6, 1995, 88-98; Michael Hitt, R. Duane Ireland, and Robert E. Hoskisson, Strategic Management (St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1995), 100-113; and Raymond E. Miles, Charles c. Snow, Alan D. Meyer, and Henry L. Coleman, Jr., “Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process,” Academy of Management Review 3 (1978), 546-562
Strategy Culture Size/ Life Cycle Environment Contingency FactorsAffecting Organization Design Technology Organizational Structure and Design The Right Mix of Design Characteristics Fits the Contingency Factors
Contingency Approaches to the Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness External Environment Organization Internal activities and processes Resource Inputs Product and Service Outputs Resource-based approach Internal process approach Goal approach
Reported Goalsof U.S. Corporations Goal% Corporations Profitability 89 Growth 82 Market Share 66 Social Responsibility 65 Employee welfare 62 Product quality and service 60 Research and development 54 Diversification 51 Efficiency 50 Financial stability 49 Resource conservation 39 Management development 35 Source: Adapted from Y. K. Shetty, “New Look at Corporate Goals,” California Management Review 22, no. 2 (1979), pp. 71-19.
Four Models ofEffectiveness Values STRUCTURE Flexibility Human Relations Emphasis Primary Goal: human resource development Subgoals: cohesion, morale, training Open Systems Emphasis Primary Goal: growth, resource acquisition Subgoals: flexibility, readiness, external evaluation F O C U S External Internal Internal Process Emphasis Primary Goal: stability, equilibrium Subgoals: information management, communication Rational Goal Emphasis Primary Goal: productivity, efficiency, profit Subgoals: planning, goal setting Control Adapted from Robert E. Quinn and John Rohrbaugh, “A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Toward a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis,” Management Science 29 (1983): 363-377; and Robert E. Quinn and Kim Cameron, “Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence,” Management Science 29 (1983): 33-51.
Contingency Effectiveness Approaches • Goal Approaches • Indicators • Usefulness • Resource Based Approach • Indicators • Usefulness • Internal Process Approach • Indicators • Usefulness
ORGANIZATION A ORGANIZATION B Effectiveness Valuesfor Two Organizations STRUCTURE FLEXIBILITY Human Relations Emphasis Open Systems Emphasis F O C U S INTERNAL EXTERNAL Internal Process Emphasis RationalGoal Emphasis CONTROL
Workbook Activity Identifying CompanyGoals and Strategies
Competing Values andOrganizational Effectiveness Workshop Activity