120 likes | 286 Views
Improving the transparency in fuzzy modelling of radiotherapy margins in cancer treatment. Bongile Mzenda, Alexander Gegov, David Brown. Overview. Margins in radiotherapy Fuzzy networks Methodology Results Conclusions. Margins in radiotherapy. Account for presence of organ motion,
E N D
Improving the transparency in fuzzy modelling of radiotherapy margins in cancer treatment Bongile Mzenda, Alexander Gegov, David Brown
Overview • Margins in radiotherapy • Fuzzy networks • Methodology • Results • Conclusions
Margins in radiotherapy • Account for presence of organ motion, • patient setup and delineation errors
Margins methods • Shortcomings of presently used margin • derivations methods: • Do not include delineation errors • Do not consider dose effects on • surrounding critical organs • Cannot be adapted to changing patient • conditions
Fuzzy networks • Offer novel methodology to address above • shortcomings • Consist of networked rule based systems • Deal with process inputs sequentially while • taking into account the interactions and the • structure of the system
Fuzzy networks General structure
Methodology • Treatment study used to deduce variation in tumour and critical organ dose sensitive parameters (V99% & V60) with errors • Fuzzy network model design
Methodology Gaussian membership functions used for inputs and output Linguistic composition of individual rule bases
Results Comparison to fuzzy system & Stroom et al statistical method
Results Comparison to fuzzy system & van Herk et al statistical method
Results Mean absolute error (MAE) analysis Transparency index (TI)
Conclusions • Use of fuzzy network resulted in better • correlation of input and output parameters • Fuzzy network results lie in between currently • used statistical methods • Improved transparency from fuzzy network • User friendly for clinical users to present their • expert knowledge in rule design