220 likes | 311 Views
Finite Buffer Fluid Networks with Overflows. Yoni Nazarathy , Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne. Stijn Fleuren and Erjen Lefeber , Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands. The University of Sydney, Operations Management and Econometrics Seminar, July 29, 2011.
E N D
Finite Buffer Fluid Networks with Overflows Yoni Nazarathy, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne. StijnFleuren and ErjenLefeber, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands. The University of Sydney, Operations Management and Econometrics Seminar, July 29, 2011.
“Almost Discrete” Sojourn Time Phenomena Taken from seminar of AviMandelbaum, MSOM 2010 (slide 82).
Outline • Background: Open Jackson networks • Introducing overflows • Fluid networks as limiting approximations • Traffic equations and their solution • Discrete sojourn times
Open Jackson NetworksJackson 1957, Goodman & Massey 1984, Chen & Mandelbaum 1991 Problem Data: Assume: open, no “dead” nodes Traffic Equations (Stable Case): Traffic Equations (General Case):
Open Jackson NetworksJackson 1957, Goodman & Massey 1984, Chen & Mandelbaum 1991 Problem Data: Assume: open, no “dead” nodes Traffic Equations (Stable Case): Product Form “Miracle”:
Modification: Finite Buffers and Overflows Problem Data: Assume: open, no “dead” nodes, no “jam” (open overflows) Explicit Solutions: Generally No Exact Traffic Equations: Generally No A practical (important) model: We say Yes
Scaling Yields a Fluid System A sequence of systems: Make the jobs fast and the buffers big by taking The proposed limiting model is a deterministic fluid system:
Fluid Trajectories as an Approximation Not proved in this current work, yet similar statement appears in a different model (and rigorously proved). Come to 14:00 Stats Seminar, Carslaw 173.
Traffic Equations or or
LCP (Linear Complementarity Problem)
Existence, Uniqueness and Solution Immediate naive algorithm with 2Msteps We essentially assume that our matrix ( ) is a “P”-Matrix We have an algorithm (for our G) taking M2steps
Back To Sojourn Times…. Taken from seminar of AviMandelbaum, MSOM 2010 (slide 82).
The “Fast” Chain and “Slow” Chain start 1’ 1 0 “Fast” chain on {0, 1, 2, 1’, 2’, 3’, 4’}: 2’ 2 3’ “Slow” chain on {0, 1, 2} DPH distribution (hitting time of 0) transitions based on “Fast” chain 4’ E.g: Moshe Haviv (soon) book: Queues, Section on “Shortcutting states”
The DPH Parameters (Details) “Fast” chain “Slow” chain
Summary • Trend in queueing networks in past 20 years: “When don’t have product-form…. don’t give up: try asymptotics” • Limiting traffic equations and trajectories • Molecule sojourn times (asymptotic) – Discrete!!! • Future work on the limits: • More standard: E.g. convergence of trajectories (2:00 talk) • Hi-tech (I don’t know how to approach): Weak convergence of sojourn times (we will leave it as a conjecture for now)
“Molecule” Sojourn Times Observe, For job at entrance of buffer : A job at entrance of buffer : routed almost immediately according to A “fast” chain and “slow” chain…