140 likes | 159 Views
Market Institutions and the future course of the SA Property Market. ( Prof) Francois Viruly School of construction Economics and Management – Johannesburg ERES CONFERENCE 2009 STOCKHOLM. The research focus;.
E N D
Market Institutions and the future course of the SA Property Market ( Prof) Francois Viruly School of construction Economics and Management – Johannesburg ERES CONFERENCE 2009 STOCKHOLM
The research focus; • The application of the principles of institutional economics to explain the course transformation in the South African property sector. • An analysis of how public sector interventions have attempted to influence the path of institutional change. • The success and failure of the policy approach adopted in South Africa.
The Theoretical background; • The institutional approach ( North 1990) • That market transaction occur within an institutional framework; • Institutions ( or the rules of the game ) are of a formal and informal nature; • Economic institutions result in certain market outcomes and behaviour; • The Path of institutional change has been explained in numerous ways ( Mahoney 2000); • Utility/ Increasing Returns explanations ( North 1990) • The functional Approach – system approach • The Power centered approach
The theoretical background – the policy perspective • Policy makers need to understand that the path to institutional change is influenced by • Path Dependence • Institutional “ Lock in” • The interest to retain a particular institutional arrangement ( that may be inefficient) can have economic as well as political dimensions • Changing the path of institutional change can be difficult and requires interventions at different levels of the institutional hierarchy. • It is equally important to understand the linkages that exist between institutions.
Institutional Explanation of Property Development( Keoch and D’arcy 1999) • The Institutional Environment • - political institutions - social institutions • - legal institutions - economic institutions • The Property Market as Institution • market (and non-market aspects) - decentralised and informal • legal and conventional aspects of - legal and conventional property rights aspects of land use and development • Property Market Organisations • users - investors • specialist developers constructors - property service providers • - financial services providers - professional bodies • - governmental and non-governmental agencies
The Historical Back ground to Black economic Empowerment and Institutions in the SA Property Market • Apartheid Years and Institutions • Volkskapitalism • Legislation was used to provide opportunities for whites and the exclusion of blacks ( 1913 land Act , Group areas Act 1958) • By the 1980 , A breaking point is reached and the utility , functional and power centered basis for the existing institutional arrangements is weakened. • The Post Apartheid Period; • By 1994 the ANC initiates its transformation policies with GEAR / RDP policies • This is followed in 2001 with the BEE commission and the 2003 BBBEE Act - this sets for the mandate of sectoral transformation charters • More recently the shift has moved to a procurement policy and supporting of organisations in the property sector.
BEE Institutional Hierarchy Path Dependence / Sequencing
BBBEE and the Property transformation charter ( PTC) • The PTC was primarily influenced by the BBBEE act , which encouraged voluntary sectoral transformation initiatives • It emphasizes that - “Despite legislative interventions , the transformation of the sector has generally been slow; • It included broad consultation within the sector; • It includes; • A charter council ( of a supervisory nature) • A scorecard incorporating certain benchmarks • These appropriate code of good practice has now been adopted by the department of trade and Industry and are being proposed as a norm for future charters and the benchmark that government departments should use in their procurement activities
Property Sector Score Card Source: Property Sector Transformation charter (2007)
The more recent developments… • Dissatisfaction with the pace of process; • There is a growing sentiment that the sector is not transforming at an acceptable rate • Government is starting to become more aggressive with its procurement ( length of leases , property management and facility management) • The creation of the property transformation coalition. • The creation of a South African National Property empowerment Company.
The policy Dimension of the Hierachy of institutions The Institutional Framework / Legislation The Sectoral Institutional Framework The Organisational Institutional Framework
Concluding remarks • The SA property market provides an interesting case study of the difficulties that arise when attempting to shift the path of institutional change. • Policies need to understand and apply policies that can address the issues that cause path dependence and institutional lack in. • Interventions primarily based on a top down approach ( starting with legislation) , may not necessary result in significant change at the institutional and organizational institutional levels. • Yet institutional change at the higher echelons of the institutional Hierarchy may be required to promote changes at different levels. • The paper illustrates that when instruments are undertaken consideration should be given to; • Sequencing • Timing • and the type of interventions. • Failure in achieving results with a top down approach; means that a bottom-up approach driven by organizations and not the state becomes significant