1 / 5

Semantic Web Meets E-Government

Semantic Web Meets E-Government. Results from Break-Out Session: Process and Services. Tomas Vitvar tomas.vitvar@deri.org. Semantic Web Meets E-Government (SWEG), AAAI Spring Symposium 27-29 March, Stanford, USA. Participants, Projects, SWS Frameworks. Projects and Participants

ivrit
Download Presentation

Semantic Web Meets E-Government

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Semantic Web Meets E-Government Results from Break-Out Session: Process and Services Tomas Vitvar tomas.vitvar@deri.org Semantic Web Meets E-Government (SWEG), AAAI Spring Symposium 27-29 March, Stanford, USA

  2. Participants, Projects, SWS Frameworks • Projects and Participants • EU Research Projects: DIP, SemanticGov, OntoGov • EU Industrial Activities (BPM) • Canadian Research Activities • Frameworks • SWS: WSMO, OWL-S, WSDL-S • BPM • Many projects just started or ongoing • SWS new approach in e-government

  3. Outcomes (1) • Applicability of SWS to e-Government • Technical point of view: • in principle, e-gov system can be seen as service oriented architecture • Organizational point of view: • People need to understand benefits of WS and SOA in e-gov -> education • WS – need support of companies that government can rely on • In practise, PA not even ready to use WS -> SWS would be challenging • SWS as built on WS is one step forward

  4. Outcomes (2) • Value Added for e-Government, Advantage of using SWS in e-Gov • SWS can help in solving heterogeneity issues • Data Interoperability (domain ontologies, data mediation) • Process Interoperability – not a big issue? • SWS can help in formalizing PA service model • BPM • E.g. PA service model from GEA formalized using WSMO and WSML • Value Added for SWS Technologies? • Verification of SWS frameworks, feedback to SWS development • Revealing missing aspects of SWS from e-government

  5. Outcomes (3) • Community synergies • Use Cases – evaluation of UC, sharing UC, lessons learned • Differences between US and Europe • WSDL-S – not applied to SWS • Canada – survey on possibilities, use of SWS • The most relevant standardisation issues • SWS • W3C standardization efforts in SWS (SWS IG, Semantics for WS) • OASIS standardization efforts in SEE TC • E-Gov • “standardization” process at national levels (common data models for PA) -> domain ontology infrastructure

More Related