1 / 16

Enhancement of Study Programs in Public Health Law, Health Management, Health Economics, and Health Informatics in Monte

Evaluation statutes for the University of Applied Sciences Heilbronn's medical informatics programs. The evaluation process includes assessing course content, lecturer performance, learning objectives, and workload.

iware
Download Presentation

Enhancement of Study Programs in Public Health Law, Health Management, Health Economics, and Health Informatics in Monte

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ERASMUS+ KA2 PROJECT: Enhancement of study programs in Public Health Law, Health Management, Health Economics and Health Informatics in Montenegro ConsortiumMeeting 22-23th November, Athens Project web site: www.ph-elim.net

  2. Evaluation Statutesof University of Applied Sciences Heilbronn(cooperation partner of medical informatics programs) §1 Domain §2 Objective of Evaluations §3 Responsibilities §4 Subjects and Deadlines §5 Standardized Data Collection §6 Additional Data Collection by the Faculty §7 Additional Data Collection by Teachers §8 Implemention of Uniform Data Recording §9 Use of Evaluation Results within the University §10 Use of Evaluation Results outside the Univ. §11 Archiving and Anonymization of Data §12 Commencement

  3. Evaluation Medical Informatics Programmes Evaluation statutes Each course is evaluated every two years Application system: EvaSys TANs provided by teachers for students for each course to access questionaire Evaluation in between lectures to give room for improvement Individual feedback to teacher

  4. 1. Please indicate to what extent the following statements apply to the course 1.1 The learning objective of the course is clearly defined. 1.2 The content of the lecture is structured and easy to follow. 1.3 The lecturer ensures that the course material has been understood. 1.4 The lecturer succeeds in making the subject and subject material both interestingandmotivating. 1.5 The course has encouraged me to go into the subject matter more deeplybymyself.

  5. 1. Please indicate to what extent the following statements apply to the course 1.6 The interrelationship with other subjects is clearly illustrated. 1.7 The relevance to current business practice is clearly illustrated. 1.8 The lecturer summarizes and repeats key points. 1.9 The students are actively involved in the course by means of discussion, groupwork etc. 1.10 The content of the course corresponds to the course description in the modulehandbook. 1.11 Apart from the lecture time, I invested on average, xx hours in this course per week:

  6. 2. General Evaluation 2.1 All in all I am satisfied with the course. 2.2 All in all I am satisfied with the performance of the lecturer. 2.3 The lecturer created a good working atmosphere. 2.4 The seminar room was appropriate for the course. 3. General Information Gender

  7. 4. Additional questions for evaluation of the Heidelberg University 4.1. The learning objectives of the course were clearly defined at the very beginning. 4.2. The courseisclearlystructured. 4.3. The learning material istaught in a comprehensibleway. 4.4. Questionsandconcernsofthestudentsareconsideredandresponded. 4.5. Verygood individual learningprocess.

  8. 5. Additional questions about the workload of the Heidelberg University 5.1. Compared to other courses my individual workload for this course is: 5.2. If credit points (LP) are given: Compared to the credit points obtained my actual workload for this course is: (1 LP = 30 hours)

  9. http://en.evasys.de/main/home.html

  10. EvaSys evaluation software for the higher education sector http://en.evasys.de/main/products/survey-and-evaluation-software/evasys-suite/evasys-education.html “The regular evaluation of courses through the assessment of students is an important component of assuring the quality of teaching and studies. With EvaSys Education you hold all the cards in your hands for all phases of a survey. The survey itself can be conducted as a classic paper-based survey, online survey or combined as a hybrid survey. EvaSys Education supports the conduction of surveys from creating questionnaires to the automated capturing and evaluation. The web-based platform with its role concept is ideal for a straightforward use in spread out organizations and to implement manifold survey projects organization-wide”

  11. EvaSys http://en.evasys.de/main/products/survey-and-evaluation-software/evasys-suite/evasys-education.html “The software, specifically catered to the requirements of universities, is suitable for a wide variety of survey projects and can be utilized for instance for course evaluations, alumni surveys, outcome-based evaluations and campus surveys and integrated optimally into the existing IT and process landscape. With EvaSys Education, you receive an unrivaled level of automation of the entire process. EvaSys can be integrated smoothly into various learning management systems and other applications via our web service or plug-in interfaces. A data import (CSV, XML) from course management systems is also possible.”

  12. Medical Faculty Heidelberg Quality Management Team Report foreachcourse General report after eachterm summary: What was helpful, whattoimprove comparisontoearliercoursesormodules detailedresults: what was helpful detailedresults: whattoimprove Teachershavetoreplytothereport

  13. Teachers Reply to General Report Please summarize those evaluation results which appear most important to you.

  14. Teachers Reply to General Report Which conclusions you draw from the most important evaluation results. Please take the following aspects into account.

More Related