Assessment rubric for etec 590 e-portfolio

1. Assessment rubric for etec 590 e-portfolio Master of Educational Technology (MET)

2. Audience Criteria (Check off) • Is stated and defined • Is relevant and applicable • Is discussed and explained in reasonable detail • Remains implied throughout the project Grade (Check off) • Pass • In progress

3. Purpose Criteria (Check off) • Is stated and explained in reasonable detail • Is relevant and applicable to the target audience • Complements and supports the metaphor • Is reflected in the content throughout the project • Is reflective and introspective in nature Grade (Check off) • Pass • In progress

4. Artifacts Criteria (Check off) • Demonstrate personal, professional, and educational growth • Are varied in selection • Are relevant and applicable to overall theme and metaphor • Are at least ten in number • Are meaningful and purposeful • Complements and supports the purpose Grade (Check off) • Pass • In progress

5. Metaphor Criteria (Check off) • Is personal • Is unique • Is sensible, reasonable, and appropriate • Is intriguing, interesting, and/or compelling • Is meaningful and purposeful Grade (Check off) • Pass • In progress

6. Reflections • Criteria (Check off) • Are meaningful and purposeful • Show personal, professional, and educational growth throughout the MET journey • Are supportive, applicable, and relevant to the artifacts • Demonstrate accumulated knowledge, skill, and learning Grade (Check off) • Pass • In progress

7. Multimedia Criteria (Check off) • Is varied in number and in type • Is relevant and applicable to MET reflections and MET journey • Is embedded correctly for viewing • Is sourced/documented Grade (Check off) • Pass • In progress

8. Tour Guide Criteria (Check off) • Is easy to understand and to follow • Is articulate • Is not too long (i.e. 3-5 minutes) • Is operational • Is in video format • Is of reasonable quality in audio and in video production Grade (Check off) • Pass • In progress

9. Navigation Criteria (Check off) • Is user-friendly (i.e. easy and simple to scroll through portfolio content and to click on hyperlinks and multimedia) • Is not cluttered (i.e. not too multi-layered) • Is organized, using tabs, headings, menu, categories, and/or headers Grade (Check off) • Pass • In progress

10. Content Organization Criteria (Check off) • Is reader-friendly • Is visually appealing • Is relevant and applicable to the MET reflections and the overall MET journey • Uses paragraph formatting • Includes various scholarly references and citations • Is meaningful and purposeful Grade (Check off) • Pass • In progress

11. Visual Presentation Criteria (Check off) • Is aesthetically pleasing • Is creative • Is unique Grade (Check off) • Pass • In progress

12. Design Criteria (Check off) • Is visually appealing • Uses a variety of creative and artistic features that capture attention • Is relevant and applicable to theme and metaphor • Is unique Grade (Check off) • Pass • In progress

13. Style Criteria (Check off) • Is personal • Is unique • Is interesting, intriguing, captivating, and/or compelling • Is visually appealing Grade (Check off) • Pass • In progress

14. Conventions Criteria (Check off) • No multiple spelling or grammatical errors • Use of a variety of sentence structures • No unintended colloquialisms and clichés • No non-standard English • Appropriate use of capitalizations and punctuation • No overall use of wordiness Grade (Check off) • Pass • In progress

15. Documentation Criteria (Check off) • Is cited and referenced according to APA formatting • Is cited and referenced correctly and appropriately throughout the project • Is varied, using at least 10 scholarly materials (e.g. e-articles, e-journals, Web sites) • > Includes a bibliography Grade (Check off) • Pass • In progress