280 likes | 389 Views
LEASING LAND WORKSHOP. David Armstrong AK Consultants 19 July 2010. Issues to discuss. Leasing options/definitions Objectives, tenant and landowner Risks and rewards The lease agreement The financial value Other issues Golden Rules. Leasing or share farming.
E N D
LEASING LAND WORKSHOP David Armstrong AK Consultants 19 July 2010
Issues to discuss • Leasing options/definitions • Objectives, tenant and landowner • Risks and rewards • The lease agreement • The financial value • Other issues • Golden Rules
Leasing or share farming • Difference – who takes the risks • Production and market risks • Lease – tenant usually carries the risks • Share-farming; risks are shared • Leasing, for a paddock or property; short or long term. General principles apply.
Objectives • Landowner and tenant – may not be “in sync” • Landowner - Income - Resources maintained or improved • Tenant – Profit - Growing his business - Increasing scale
So, why lease land? • In 2008/09 69% of Tasmanian Farms had EVAO < $150,000 • So, lease to gain economies of scale. • Owner of a small operation can not justify modern, efficient and large scale equipment. • Lessee can justify newer and more productive equipment.
Tractor overhead costs Example, 130 HP FWA tractor, 2007 costs Overhead costs include interest, depreciation, insurance, shedding, registration
Other benefits of scale • More efficient, reliable and safer equipment is justified. • Larger businesses - better negotiating power. • More worthwhile investing in training and research. • More attractive to contracting companies. • So, a tenant may bring something of higher value to land that the landowner cannot.
The Lease Agreement • Must have a written agreement. • Define the area & exclusions • What else is included; particularly water • Duration, options or rights for renewal. Is renewal a right for the tenant; what conditions Rolling leases. • Premature departure by the tenant; replacement with another tenant?
The Lease Agreement • Agreed departure date. • Penalty for late departure Delay could preclude future cropping opportunity • Commencement date; Autumn is often a good time. • Payment; amount, timing, procedure. Annual fee adjustment, cpi
The Lease Agreement Repair and maintenance issues • Agreement – maintain present condition record what that is at start • Soil fertility – agreed fertiliser.Tenant to provide evidence, or Owner applies. Apply extra to hay/silage paddocks. Consider sale of hay/silage from the property. • End of lease – same pasture area • Weed control – specify weed species • Fences, yards, buildings, roads etc.
The Lease Agreement • Cropping paddocks.Specify cropping intensity Paddock to be sown down at end of lease • Access to water Who has priority of limited • Capital improvements – clarify ownership • Conflict resolution – establish a procedure • Other payments – rates, licences insurance etc
Valuing the lease • Percentage of land value • Percentage of Gross Margin • Percentage of Gross Income • Check the market; real estate agents.
Valuing the lease • Percentage of land value Historically, 4-6% for grazing 6-8% for cropping • These values now too high • Perhaps double what is realistic
Valuing the lease • Percentage of Gross Margin25-33% of GM. Level depends on risk. • The remainder is required for:Contribution to overhead costs, including R&M Contribution to interest Return for the Tenant’s time and effort Return for taking the risks • Examples:Sheep, GM ~$25/dse, lease 33%, $7-8/dse Potatoes, GM $4,000/ha, lease 25%, $400/ac.
Valuing the lease • Percentage of Gross Income16-22% of Gross More common in US for cropping land, 20%Justifiably lower here because tenant has more maintenance obligations.
Value of water • Should water be valued separately? • I suggest not. • The cost of land and water should not be more than 25-33% of the GM.
Leasing livestock • Sometimes considered. • Value is the interest cost, and for the risk. • Requires continuation of breeding strategy.
Leasing equipment • I generally advise against including equipment in a farming lease:potential for disputes over maintenance. • Who is responsible for maintenance? • Objectives inconsistent.
Leasing a centre pivot • A Pivot is fixture. • Who is responsible for repair and maintenance? I suggest the tenant. • Responsibility for negligence?
Leasing cost for a centre pivot • What are the annual costs?If asset purchase ($6,000/ha capital, 6 years @ 7%), $1,258/ha. Interest & depreciation over 15 years, $925/ha.
Share farming • Shares risks and rewards. • Assume a Joint Venture approach: Owner gets a lease fee for the land. Share farmer engaged as contractor. Share farmer paid for management. The JV shares cash costs. • Proceeds shared equally. • Risks are shared equally.
Share farming Joint Venture Pays Owner for land Profits divided equally Pays for materials Pays SF for managing Pays SF work
Golden Rules • Benefits are not without risks. • The potential for economies of scale. • Tenant may allow land to be used for higher value purposes. • Responsibility and costs borne by beneficiary. • Know and trust each other. • Ensure documentary evidence.