240 likes | 381 Views
Effects of nozzle type on fungicide applications to corn. Scott Bretthauer Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Objective and methods. Objective: compare flat-fan nozzles and rotary atomizers for fungicide application on corn
E N D
Effects of nozzle type on fungicide applications to corn Scott Bretthauer Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Objective and methods • Objective: compare flat-fan nozzles and rotary atomizers for fungicide application on corn • Spray solution for both treatments: Stratego fungicide and Vision Pink dye • Sampling • 4 plots per treatment – 10 plants per plot • 1 Kromekote paper per plant – ear height on sample holder 7 inches from stalk • Kromekote analysis – percent coverage, GPA, DV0.1, DV0.5, and DV0.9 • Mixed models and regression analysis
Aircraft: both treatments with AT-402B at 140 MPH and a height of 12 feet – 2 GPA • Rotary atomizers • Micronair AU5000 • VRU = 13 @ 35 psi • 11 atomizers • 70 ft swath • DV0.5 = 250 µm • % cov = 9.97 • Flat-fan nozzles • CP-11TT w/FF4010 • 35 psi – 15 deg • 38 nozzles • 65 ft swath • DV0.5 = 372 µm • % cov = 4.69
Results – regression significant P < 0.0001; R-square = 0.58
Results – mixed model using nozzle type and DV0.5 as predictor variables
Conclusions • Flat-fan nozzles provided higher mean percent coverage and GPA deposition • Rotary atomizers had more uniform coverage and GPA across all cards • Droplet size had greater effect on coverage than nozzle type – proper setup no matter what nozzle is used • DV0.5 ~ 250 µm provided greatest coverage - better canopy penetration? • Product impacts on droplet size?
QUESTIONS? Scott Bretthauer (217) 333-9418 sbrettha@illinois.edu
BASF Project – Meade, KSJuly 28, 2009 Spray Solution Effects on Fungicide Application to Corn
Materials and Methods: • AT 401(Bringham Flying Service, Craig Stratton - Pilot) • Drop booms • CP-09 (29 - .078 and 9 - .125) w/5° deflection • 36 PSI • 67 foot swath, 120 mph ground speed by GPS • Droplet spectrum - Medium • Aircraft calibrated for 3 GPA
Treatments 1All treatments were applied at 28 L/Ha (3 GPA) using tap water. 2Vision Pink added at 1 quart (16 oz) per 50 gallons of water.
N Headline SC (5.8 oz/ac) + Caramba (6.1 oz/ac) Headline SC (6 oz/ac) + COC (1 pt.ac) Headline EC (6 oz/ac) + COC (1 pt/ac) Quilt (14 oz/ac) + COC (1 pt/ac) Untreated Check Untreated Check Untreated Check 7 1 3 5
Summary • Differences were found in coverage among treatments within the corn canopy. • Treatments had little effect on droplet size • Yield differences were minimal. • Disease control varied by treatment, timing, and field location. • Damage from disease increased over time.