330 likes | 404 Views
New Physics Scenarios in B hh. April 20, 2005 2nd SuperB Workshop @ Hawaii. Intro: NP in EWP? PQCDF and A K p but A K p 0 ? Why 4th Generation? Results Summary. Observation of Direct CP Violation. A K p = - 0. 114 0.020. 5.7 s. d. p 0. _ d.
E N D
New Physics Scenarios in B hh April 20, 20052nd SuperB Workshop @ Hawaii SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Intro: NP in EWP? • PQCDF and AKp • but AKp0 ? • Why 4th Generation? • Results • Summary SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Observation of Direct CP Violation AKp = -0.1140.020 5.7 s SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
d p0 _ d b s B- K- u u B0 K+p0 3.6s fromK+p- AKp0 = 0.0490.040 Large EW penguin (Z0) ? New Physics ? SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Buras @ CKM05 SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Buras @ CKM05 Z’ SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Fleischer @ CKM05 Parametrize EWP SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Fleischer @ CKM05 SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Fleischer @ CKM05 Prediction a bit coarse different sign convention SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
PQCDF and AKp SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
B- K0- 0.01 - 0.01 - 0.02 0.03 B0 K00 - 0.04 - 0.02 0.02 0.14 B- K- 0 0.08 - 0.10 0.04 0.04 B0 K- + 0.04 - 0.16 - 0.11 0.02 But SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
PQCDF Factorizable Non Factorizable Annihilation Phase SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Why 4th Generation? Natural for impact on EWP. SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
measured from unitarity Set safe Phase SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
SM 3 SM 4 new unitarity condition new penguin from t’ SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Tree QCD penguin SM4 naturally impact on EWP EW penguin SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Results SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Arhrib and WS Hattori, Hasuike and Wakaizumi Yanir 4th generation not excluded favored allowed Excluded SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
EWP SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
d “adjustable” Cancellation btwn fsb andf1 SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Predictions b b SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Brought down for smaller fsb SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
New Avg. PDG04 Difficult even at SuperB SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Summary • Difference in AKp0 and AKp suggest • Non-standard EWP • 4th Generation Carries Phase • Naturally impact on EWP • With AKp predicted by PQCDF • account for AKp 0 ~ 0 if • Predictions • - b sll on high side • - DmBs close to current bound w/ sin2FBs< 0 • -Rc - Rn OK;AK0p0~ 0.05 – 0.1,SK0p0 ~ 0.4 – 0.5 • - ACP in b sg a fraction of SM value of 0.4% ~ SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Backup SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Factorizable Non Factorizable SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Effective Feynman Rules SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Adjustablility of d SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Less shift forAfK SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
Rc - Rn basically OK SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
The Case of FSI Problem vs SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
FSI + 4TH generation PEW leakage from to and from to have similar behavior No existence of a region of the parameter space where the asymmetries fit the experimental data SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou
SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou