Chapter 8 Attitude Change and Interactive Communications

1. Chapter 8Attitude Change and Interactive Communications

2. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-2

3. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-3 Chapter Objectives (cont.) The way a marketer structures his message determines how persuasive it will be. Audience characteristics help to determine whether the nature of the source or the message itself will be relatively more effective.

4. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-4 Changing Attitudes Through Communication Persuasion: effectiveness of marketing communications to change attitudes What influences people to change their minds or comply:

5. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-5 Tactical Communications Options Who will be source of message? How should message be constructed? What media will transmit message? What target market characteristics will influence ad�s acceptance?

6. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-6 Traditional Communication Model Communications model: a number of elements are necessary for communication to be achieved

7. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-7 Interactive Communications Consumers have many more choices available and greater control to process messages Permission marketing: marketer will be much more successful in persuading consumers who have agreed to let him try

8. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-8 Updated Communications Model Consumers are now proactive in communications process: VCRs, DVRs, video-on-demand, pay-per-view TV, Caller ID, Internet

9. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-9 New Message Formats M-commerce (mobile commerce): marketers promote goods and services via wireless devices Blogging: people post messages to the Web in diary form New forms of blogging: Moblogging Video blogging (vlogging) Podcasting RSS (Really Simple Syndication) Flogs (fake blogs) Twittering

10. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-10 The Source Source effects: the same words by different people can have very different meanings A �source�often a spokesperson in an ad�may be chosen because s/he is expert, famous, attractive, or a �typical� consumer What makes a good source? Source credibility: a source�s perceived expertise, objectivity, or trustworthiness Source attractiveness: movie star, super model

11. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-11 Sleeper Effect Sometimes sources become irritating or disliked Sleeper effect: over time, disliked sources can still get a message across effectively We �forget� about negative source while changing our attitudes

12. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-12 Source Biases Consumer beliefs about product can be weakened by a source perceived to be biased Knowledge bias: source�s knowledge about a topic is not accurate Reporting bias: source has required knowledge but source�s willingness to convey it is compromised

13. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-13 Hype versus Buzz Buzz: authentic message generated by customers Hype: inauthentic message generated by corporate propaganda

14. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-14 Hype versus Buzz (cont.) �Stealth� buzz building: marketers create buzz by implying that they had nothing to do with the buzz Example: Blair Witch Project

15. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-15 Source Attractiveness Source attractiveness: perceived social value of source Physical appearance Personality Social status Similarity

16. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-16 �What Is Beautiful Is Good� Halo effect: people who rank high on one dimension are assumed to excel at other dimensions Example: good-looking people are thought to be smarter, cooler, happier Physically attractive source leads to attitude change Directs attention to marketing stimuli Beauty = source of information

17. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-17 Star Power Celebrities as communications sources Tiger Woods�$62 million/year in endorsements! Famous faces capture attention and are processed more efficiently by the brain Enhance company image and brand attitudes Celebrities embody cultural and product meanings Q-Score for celebrity endorsers Match-up hypothesis: celebrity�s image and that of product are similar

18. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-18 Discussion Many marketers use celebrity endorsers to persuade. These spokespeople often are �cool� musicians, athletes, or stars. Who would overall be the most effective celebrity endorser today, and why? Who would be the least effective, and why?

19. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-19 Nonhuman Endorsers Often, celebrities� motives are suspect as endorsers of mismatched products Thus, marketers seek alternative endorsers: Cartoon characters Mascots/animals Avatar: cyberspace character that can be moved around in a virtual world

20. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-20 The Message Positive and negative effects of elements in TV commercials Most important feature: stressing unique product attribute/benefit

21. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-21 The Message (cont.) Message: is it conveyed in words or pictures? Message issues facing a marketer How often should message be repeated? Should it draw an explicit conclusion? Should it show both sides of argument? Should it explicitly compare product to competitors?

22. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-22 Sending the Message Visual versus verbal communication of message Visual images: big emotional impact Verbal message: high-involvement situations Factual information More effective when reinforced by a framed picture Require more frequent exposures (due to decay)

23. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-23 Dual Component of Brand Attitudes

24. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-24 Vividness Powerful description/graphics command attention and are strongly embedded in memory Concrete discussion of product attribute

25. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-25 Repetition and the Two-Factor Theory Two-factor theory: fine line between familiarity and boredom

26. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-26 One- versus Two-Sided Arguments One-sided: supportive arguments Two-sided: both positive and negative information Refutational argument: negative issue is raised, then dismissed Positive attributes should refute presented negative attributes Effective with well-educated and not-yet-loyal audiences

27. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-27 Comparative Advertising Comparative advertising: message compares two+ recognizable brands on specific attributes �Unlike McDonalds, all of Arby's chicken sandwiches are made with 100% all-natural chicken� But, confrontational approach can result in source derogation An ad for a new product should not: Merely, say it is better than leading brand Compare itself to an obviously superior competitor

28. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-28 Emotional versus Rational Appeals Appeal to the head or to the heart? Many companies use an emotional strategy when consumers do not find differences among brands Especially brands in well-established, mature categories (e.g., cars and greeting cards) Recall of ad contents tends to be better for �thinking� ads Although conventional ad effectiveness measures may not be entirely valid to assess emotional ads

29. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-29 Sex Appeals Sexual appeals vary by country Nude models generate negative feelings/tension among same-sex consumers Erotic ads draw attention, but strong sexual imagery may make consumers less likely to: Buy a product (unless product is related to sex) Process and recall ad�s content

30. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-30 Discussion Name ads that rely on sex appeal to sell products What benefits are communicated in the ad? Is the message implicit or explicit? How?

31. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-31 Humorous Appeals Different cultures have different senses of humor Humorous ads get attention They�re a source of distraction They inhibit counterarguing, thus increasing message acceptance

32. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-32 Humorous Appeals (cont.) Humor is more effective when it: Doesn�t �swamp� message of clearly defined brand Doesn�t make fun of potential consumer Is appropriate to product�s image

33. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-33 Fear Appeals Emphasize negative consequences that can occur unless consumer changes behavior/attitude Fear is common in social marketing Most effective when: Threat is moderate Solution to problem is presented Source is highly credible The strongest threats are not always the most persuasive

34. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-34 Message As Art Form Advertisers use literary elements to communicate benefits and meaning Allegory: story about an abstract concept personified in a fictional character Metaphor: two dissimilar objects in a close relationship (�A is B�) Simile: compares two objects (�A is like B�) Resonance: play on words with pictures

35. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-35 Examples of Advertising Resonance

36. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-36 Forms of Story Presentation Lecture: speech in which the source speaks directly to the audience Attempts to persuade Cognitive responses may occur Drama: story that draws viewers into the action Characters indirectly address the audience Interact with each other in an imaginary setting

37. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-37 Discussion Sell the steak or the sizzle? What�s more important in an advertisement: What is said? or Who says it? Give examples of ads that use one strategy versus the other. What types of ads are more effective for each strategy?

38. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-38 Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) of Persuasion ELM: assumes that once consumers receive message, they begin to process it

39. Prentice Hall, cr 2009 8-39 Support for the ELM Variables crucial to the ELM: Message-processing involvement Argument strength Source characteristics High-involvement consumers are swayed by powerful arguments Low-involvement consumers are swayed by source attractiveness