220 likes | 561 Views
SIMPLER THAN ABC. New Ideas for Using Microsoft Excel for Allocating Costs Reciprocal Costing. OUTLINE. The purpose of the presentation is to introduce a new method of solving an old problem The old problem is service cost allocation using reciprocal costing.
E N D
SIMPLERTHAN ABC New Ideas for Using Microsoft Excel for Allocating Costs Reciprocal Costing IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
OUTLINE • The purpose of the presentation is to introduce a new method of solving an old problem • The old problem is service cost allocation using reciprocal costing. • The new method uses Excel to determine the reciprocal allocations using matrix algebra and a mathematics technique known as Cramer’s Rule. IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Benefits • By understanding this technique Decision Support Specialists can have at their fingertips what is considered the most accurate method of cost allocation between service departments while overcoming some of the problems which have kept reciprocal costing from being more widely used in practice. IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Benefits • Traceability of costs • Doesn’t require specialized software • Doesn’t require extensive mathematical training to solve systems of equations. • More accurate than earlier methods of reciprocal costing IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Service Departments Maintenance Personnel Production Departments Product A Product B Example IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Maintenance $1,000,000 Allocation Basis Value of Assets Personnel $1.800,000 Allocation Basis Number of Workers Budgeted Costs & Allocation IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Solution Methods • Direct allocation • Sequential Allocation • Reciprocal Allocation IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
DIRECT ALLOCATION Products A B $250,000 $750,000 $1,028,571 $771,429 $1,278.571 $1,521,429 IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Sequential MethodMaintenance First IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Sequential MethodPersonnel First IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Direct & Sequential Methods • Direct method is simple but less accurate • Traceability of costs are easy with sequential method but • Results are dependent on the order of allocation so sequencing needs to be justified. A B Maintenance first 1,288,311 1,511,689 Personnel first 1,170,930 1,629,070 IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Reciprocal AllocationTextbook Algebraic Method IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Reciprocal AllocationTextbook Algebraic Method(2) IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Reciprocal AllocationAlgebraic Method(3) IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Reciprocal MethodFinal Allocations to A & B IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Problems with Textbook Reciprocal Allocation Method In the preceding method the sums attributed to each service department include added amounts which defy easy explanation and leave the reciprocal costs useful only for allocation to final product. These reciprocal costs include only inward flows of resources so cannot be used to provide useful information to service department managers. IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Problems with Textbook Reciprocal Allocation Method • Traceability of cost flows between service departments is limited. • Solution of problems becomes cumbersome when service departments become numerous. IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Alternative Solution: The Math Rewriting the equations for each service department to include both outflows and inflows allows the full specification of a matrix that can be used with a common Excel function to provide reciprocal costs that do not include double counted amounts and provide for traceability of cost flows between service departments. IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Same example: new method. IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Reciprocal Cost New Method (2) IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC
Constructing the Matrix IMA Hands-on: Simpler than ABC