281 likes | 1.1k Views
Evolutionary Psychology Lecture 8: Jealousy and Mate Retention . Thoughts for the day. “No woman no cry”. Bob Marley. “He that is not jealous is not in love” St Augustine .
E N D
Evolutionary Psychology Lecture 8: Jealousy and Mate Retention.
Thoughts for the day. • “No woman no cry”. Bob Marley. • “He that is not jealous is not in love” St Augustine. • “Hey Joe. Where you goin’ with that gun in your hand? Goin’ down to shoot my old lady. You know I caught her messin’ around with another man”. (“Hey Joe”Billy Roberts, 1966). • “When you’re in love with a beautiful woman, watch your friends” (Dr Hook).
Learning Outcomes. • At the end of this session you should be able to: • 1. Discuss the evidence for the adaptive significance of romantic jealousy. • 2. Evaluate theoretical predictions concerning sex differences in jealousy.
Jealousy. • Romantic jealousy has been defined as: • "a fear and rage reaction fitted to protect, maintain, and prolong the intimate association of love" (Davis 1948). • Jealousy is generated: • "when there is a threat to, or an actual loss of a valued relationship due to an actual or imagined rival for one's partners attention” (DeSteno & Salovey, 1996).
Evolutionary Explanations For Jealousy. • Mate retention is very important for both sexes, so males and females should show jealousy to the same degree. • However, evolutionary psychologists predict that the sexes may differ in terms of the events that activate jealousy, due to the following: • 1. Paternity Uncertainty: Males can never be certain that an offspring is theirs. E.g. 9-13% of human children are being unknowingly raised by their non-genetic father (Baker, 1996). • 2. Mate Value: Young females are more reproductively valuable, and a few males can monopolise them, so there will always be males seeking to steal mates of other males. Females may also seek extra-pair copulations if they find a superior mate (Buss, 1999).
Costs of Cuckoldry. • Investing resources in another males offspring leads to high costs for an unwitting cuckold: • 1. He has lost the considerable efforts he has put into courting the female - time, energy, risk, resources. • 2. The time spent courting the unfaithful female could have been better spent finding another. • 3. He may unknowingly continue to pour resources into a child who does not carry his genetic material. • We might therefore expect males to be particularly sensitive about their partners possible sexual infidelity.
Psychological Adaptations. • Wilson & Daly (1992) argued that sexual proprietary behaviours such as: • Mate guarding. • Male aggression. • Spousal Violence. • and certain attitudes such as: • Valuing female chastity. • Culture-wide concept of adultery as a property violation. • are evolved male solutions to the adaptive problem of paternity uncertainty.
The Female Dilemma. • Females have faced a slightly different set of adaptive problems. • If their partner commits a sexual infidelity, it has no effect on her parenthood certainty. • However, she and her offspring stand to lose a considerable loss of protection, status, and resources if the male devotes his time to another female and her offspring. • We might therefore expect females to be particularly sensitive to behaviours signalling their partners potential emotional (and of course sexual) infidelity. • The emotion of jealousy is therefore adaptive for both sexes.
But Males Stand To Lose More! • As males stand more to lose than females through sexual infidelity, we would expect the following to be particularly common in males: • 1. Increased sensitivity to circumstances in which their partner may have the chance to be unfaithful. • 2. The increased likelihood of mate guarding behaviours to reduce possible contact between their partner and other males. • 3. Greater willingness to perform actions to keep their partner. • 4. Increase of threatening and hostile behaviour to other males. • Is there any evidence for this?
1.Mate Guarding. • Extreme mate guarding (harems, concubines, multiple wives) arises when the chance for resource acquisition and hoarding exist. • Even males with access to a single female will engage in a variety of guarding behaviours: • Chaperoning. • Veiling. • Purdah (keeping males and females separate). • Chastity belts. • Genital mutilation. • Limiting education and equality. • Such cultural actions only occur with women of reproductive age. They are often conducted by female relatives to increase a girl’s mate value
Real-Life Example. • In an anthropological study of relationships in a Caribbean village, Flinn (1988) found that: • Males whose mates were of reproductive age were more often in their company than males whose mates were at post-reproductive age, or were pregnant. • A woman’s fecundity was proportionally associated with more antagonism in her mate’s interactions with her. • There was greater antagonism amongst mated couples who were not strictly monogamous. • Males who were vying for the attentions of a particular women were more antagonistic than during other male-male interactions.
2.Mate Retention. • Divorce is very common across all human societies and cultures, e.g. between 50-67% of couples will divorce in America (sexual infidelity being cited as a key cause). • This indicates that mate retention is a significant and difficult adaptive problem. • Buss (1988) tried to isolate the kinds of behaviours that individuals employ to retain a mate. • Sex differences emerged as males were more likely to monopolise her time, display or provide resources and threaten other males. • Women were more likely to use appearance enhancement, and the inducement of jealousy as tactics of mate retention.
Mate Poaching. • Schmitt & Buss (2001) found that around 50% reported attempting mate poaching, while around 85% had been the target of poaching attempts. • Nearly a quarter of males and females admitted that their current relationship was the result of a successful poaching attempt. • What makes a good mate poacher? • Schmitt & Buss (2001) found that successful female poachers are assumed to use enhancement of their appearance, and suggestions of sexual access. • Successful male poachers are assumed to be socially dominant and have access to plentiful resources. • Successful poachers of both sexes are assumed to denigrate the same sex partner by questioning their commitment and attractiveness.
Retention Behaviour in Context. • Buss & Shackelford (1997) argued that the psychological adaptations underlying mate retention behaviours may be sensitive to 3 contexts: • 1. Mate value: Reproductive or parental potential is a key factor. Age and attractiveness (for males), resource acquisition or potential (for females). • 2. Perceived mate value discrepancies: In some pair bonds there will be differences in the couples respective mate values. • 3. Perceived probability of infidelity: An important cue signalling a failure of mate retention is that of the suspicion of infidelity.
Predictions. • Buss & Shackelford (1997) assessed mate retention behaviours. They predicted that individuals fulfilling the following criteria would devote more time to mate retention: • Men married to younger and more attractive women. • Women married to men with many resources, or excellent prospects. • Individuals who suspected that their partner may be unfaithful. • They also predicted that: • Males would attempt to retain their mates by providing resources. • Females would attempt to retain their mates by enhancing their physical appearance.
Results. • 1. Men married to younger women and to women they perceived as being more very attractive devoted great efforts to mate retention. • 2. Women married to males with plentiful resources also showed more mate retention behaviours. • 3. Men (but not women) whose partners they suspected may become unfaithful significantly increased certain retention behaviours. • 4. Men were more likely to use resource-based tactics (and aggression) to retain a mate, while women were much more likely to use physical enhancement.
3. Adultery and Culture. • All human societies have some form of ritualised ‘marriage’ arrangement, and all have strict laws dealing with adultery. • In most societies, adultery is defined only as a married woman having an affair with another man. • Adultery is often explicitly treated as a property violation, with the victim being entitled to violent or economic revenge (return of the dowry). • In many countries, and in several states of the USA (up to the 1970’s), murder on the discovery of a wife’s infidelity is not considered a crime. • Until recently, husbands were legally entitled to confine their wives against their will and use force to obtain their conjugal rights.
Psychological Studies of Jealousy. • Buss et al., (1992) predicted that males and females would be differentially concerned about potential sexual and emotional infidelity. • Males >distress to sexual infidelity. • Females >distress to emotional infidelity. • Participants presented with 2 dilemmas, each concerning hypothetical sexual or emotional infidelity of their partner. • 60% of males reported greater distress to sexual infidelity compared to 17% of females. 83% of females showed greater distress to emotional infidelity. • The findings were confirmed using electrophysiology. • Males with experience of a sexual relationship showed more distress to sexual infidelity than those lacking such experiences.
Cross-Cultural Studies. • Buunk et al., (1996) presented the jealousy-invoking scenarios to participants from the USA, Germany and the Netherlands. • In each sample (containing more than 200 participants) males were much more likely to choose the sexual infidelity scenario as the most upsetting. • The largest effect was for the American group - the Germans and Dutch have long histories of sexual freedom and equality. • Culture can influence the strength of the adaptive response but the response is still significant.
Buunk et al., (1996) Results. From Buunk et al., 1996, p361
Comparison of the Techniques. • Pietrzak et al., (2002) compared the various techniques. • Participants selected a scenario which would distress them more and provided continuous ratings while physiological variables were being monitored. • 73% of males reported greater distress to the sexual infidelity scenario. • 96% of females opted for the emotional distress scenario. • Males reported stronger feelings of anger, rage and betrayal whilst imagining sexual infidelity. • Females reported stronger feelings of anger, anxiety and fear while imagining emotional infidelity. • Males showed greater physiological responses to the sexual infidelity scenario while females showed greater physiological responses to emotional infidelity
Experience of Infidelity. • Sagarin et al., (2003) also used both forced-choice and continuous rating scales and found the predicted sex differences using both measures. • In addition they assessed prior experience of infidelity, hypothesising that such experiences would make the individual particularly sensitive to the possibility of future infidelity. • As predicted the experience of being the victim of a previous infidelity led to males reporting greater distress in response to sexual infidelity, but this did not occur for women. • However, women that had perpetrated an infidelity showed greater distress while men who had perpetrated an infidelity did not.
Responses to Infidelity. • Shackelford et al., (2002) focused upon sex differences in response to a partner's infidelity. • They reasoned that a single instance of female infidelity would have a large impact on male paternity certainty. • A single instance of male infidelity would have no impact on female reproductive success. However, continued male infidelity resulting in a shift in his emotional commitment could have long-term consequences for the female in question. • They thus predicted: • Men would find it more difficult to forgive and be more likely to break up with a partner who committed a sexual infidelity. • Women would be less likely to forgive and more likely to break up with a male who committed emotional infidelity.
Shackelford et al (2002) Findings. • In their study 256 students were presented with several forced-choice dilemmas covering their responses to a sexual and emotional infidelity. • Which would they find more difficult to forgive? • Which would they consider more likely to lead to a break-up of the relationship? • As predicted, the majority of males (65%) found it more difficult to forgive a sexual infidelity and felt that such an infidelity (55%) would be more likely to break up the relationship. • The comparable figures for females were 52% and 42% of women respectively.
Characteristics of a Rival. • The status of a jealousy-inducing rival is of course important. • Dijkstra & Buunk (2001) presented men and women with scenarios of rivals flirting with their partners at a party. • After reading the scenario participants turned the page and saw a photograph of the rival (attractive or unattractive) and a personality description (dominant or passive). • The physical attractiveness of a rival did not affect men's feelings of jealousy but their dominance status did. • The reverse was true for females as physical attraction made a big impact but status did not. • The sexes are thus primarily threatened by rivals who embody what their partners may seek.