1 / 21

Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) – Better than a Bunnings Brochure?

Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) – Better than a Bunnings Brochure?. John Tobin Melbourne Law School j.tobin@unimelb.edu.au 8344 7679. The Advertising Pitch. Hulls Second Reading Speech

jaegar
Download Presentation

Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) – Better than a Bunnings Brochure?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) – Better than a Bunnings Brochure? John Tobin Melbourne Law School j.tobin@unimelb.edu.au 8344 7679

  2. The Advertising Pitch • Hulls Second Reading Speech • Today the Govt fulfils its commitment to provide better protection for HR for all people in Vic • The Bill will benefit all Victorians by recording in one place the basic … rights we all hold and expect govt to observe

  3. But wait there’s more… • The Bill will promote better Govt … [and] … will make sure there is proper debate about whether the proposed measures strike the right balance between rights… • …this bill brings human rights to the Victorian community in a relevant and practical way

  4. Is this a case of false and misleading advertising? • Let’s take it for a road test: • When can we buy it? (commencement date) • What features does it have? • which rights are included? • who must comply? • How does it operate? • what are the mechanisms for implementation? • Is it expensive to run?

  5. 1. Commencement • Section 2 • (1) 1 Jan 2007 except Div 3 and 4 of Part 3 • (2) Div 3 and 4 of Part 3 on 1 Jan 2008 • Be aware of transitional provisions (s.49) • (1) applies all Act b/4 or after commencement Part 2 (means all Acts) • (2) does not apply proceedings b/4 commencement Part 2

  6. 2. Special features I: The Rights protected • Part 2 – c and p rights only [FRED] • Based ICCPR but differences • eg: s 10 treatment w/out consent; s 17 best interests of child; s 20 property rights • Are esc rights irrelevant? • Consider section 5 and 4 year review

  7. But make sure you read the fine print • Section 7(2) • Rights may be subject to limitations that are: • Under law • Reasonable as demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society; and • Take into account all relevant factors • Nature of right (status under int’l law) • Purpose of limitation (legitimate aim) • Nature and extent of limitation (proportionality) • Relationship between limitation and purpose (rational connection) • Any less restrictive means reasonably available (minimal impairment)

  8. And the performance to date… • Consider: • Graffiti legislation • Superannuation and same sex entitlements

  9. 2. Who must comply? • Public Authorities • What is a ‘public authority’? (s 4) • ‘Core’ public authorities (s 4(1)) • Consider courts and tribunals 4(1)(j) • ‘Functional’ public authorities (s 4(2)): see YL v Birmingham City Council & Ors [2007] UKHL 27 • Function conferred by statutory provision • Function connected to or identified with functions of Govt etc

  10. Obligations of public authorities • Obligations of public authorities (s 38) • Must give ‘proper consideration’ to human rights in decision-making processes • Real, genuine and proportionate consideration • Must act compatibly with human rights • act includes failure to act

  11. So what about the private sector? • Consider: • Direct • may be functional public authorities • public authorities may impose HR conditions in contracts • Indirect • legislation regulating private sector subject to section 32 interpretative obligation

  12. 3. Implementation Mechanisms • No direct cause of action and no right to damages: s 39(3) • Cf: Bongiorno J in Gray v DPP [2008] VSC 4 • ‘The only remedy the Court can provide … is to release him on bail…’ • So….unless he’s right we need to think laterally

  13. Consider the opportunities for litigation • Exercise of administrative capacity by court or tribunal: s 4(1)(j) and s 38 • Element of a right to a fair hearing re criminal or civil matter under s 24 and s 6(2)(b) • Interpretation of legislative provision: s 32 • Declaration of inconsistent interpretation: s36 • Violation HR provides additional ground of unlawfulness to pre-existing remedy: s 39

  14. Consider the opportunities for advocacy • Statement of Compatibility: s 28 and 29 • SARC: s 30 (compatibility assessment) • s.t override declarations: s 31 • Obligations of public service: s 38 • Also: s 7(1)(f) Public Admin Act (active implementation) • VEOHRC: s 40 (intervention) and s 41 (monitoring) • Ombudsman: • consequential amendments: investigate compatibility of admin action with HR

  15. Special focus: The Interpretative Obligation • All legislation, so far as possible consistent with statutory purpose, must be interpreted compatibly with human rights (s 32(1)) • New, overarching principle of statutory interpretation: see, Ghaidan v Goden-Mendoza [2004] AC 557 • May displace previous case law and interpretations • No requirement of ambiguity or presumptive incompatibility • Ordinary meaning of words may be displaced • May permit ‘reading in’ or ‘reading down’ provision • Does not affect validity of legislation (s 32(3)(a)) but may affect validity of subordinate legislation where incompatibility is not ‘empowered’ by principal Act (s 32(3)(b))

  16. Consider examples: • Vic Charter s. 24 right to a fair hearing in criminal and civil matters • Vic Charter s 23(3) child convicted of offence to be treated appropriate to age • CYFAct s 360(5) and mandatory penalties under RSAct

  17. 4. Is it expensive to run? • … batteries are not included so… • Onus on claimant to est on bal of Pr that right subject to limitation/interference • Requires submissions • If yes, onus shifts to respondent to est that limitation justified in accordance s 7(2)

  18. So it is worth buying • UK experience: • No discernable increase in volume, costs or length of litigation • Considered in 35% of House of Lords Cases and ‘substantially affected result’ in about 10% • Cases reached a ‘peak’ in 2001-02 and are now about ½ that

  19. Litigation: Lessons from the UK • HRA appears to have focused and stimulated NGO and CLC litigation activity • Reference to HRA by practitioners and judges often cursory and unsophisticated, reflecting need for more extensive and effective legal professional and judicial education • Enhanced dialogue between UK and other human rights courts

  20. Beyond litigation: Policy and Service Delivery • Improved legislative and executive transparency and accountability • Improved framework for design and delivery of public services. Awareness-raising, education and capacity building around human rights can empower people and result in: • Better public service outcomes • Improved levels of consumer satisfaction • More flexible, individualised and responsive policies and practices • Core principles of FREDA can trigger new thinking and help decision-makers ‘see seemingly intractable problems in a new light’

  21. Key Resources • www.hrlrc.org.au • Guide to the Charter • Searchable Database of Charter Case Law • Articles, Materials and Commentary • Monthly E-Bulletin • www.justice.vic.gov.au • Evans & Evans, Australian Bills of Rights: The Law of the Victorian Charter and the ACT HRA (LexisNexis, 2008) • Pound & Evans, An Annotated Guide to the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities (Thomson, 2008)

More Related